Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:11:12.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compression in the California Vowel Shift: Tracking generational sound change in California's Central Valley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2019

Annette D'Onofrio ,
Teresa Pratt  and
Janneke Van Hofwegen
Annette D'Onofrio
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Teresa Pratt
Affiliation:
University of Duisburg-Essen
Janneke Van Hofwegen
Affiliation:
Google
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the California Vowel Shift, previously characterized as a chain shift, in communities across California's Central Valley. An incremental apparent time analysis of 72 Californians’ vowel spaces provides no clear evidence of a gradual chain shift; that is, changes have not unfolded in an order that reflects an implicational chain in chronological time. Instead, we see contemporaneous movements of vowels that work against the phonological tendency of maximal dispersion typically invoked in describing chain shifts. By analyzing change in the size and dispersion of the entire vowel space, we find that ongoing sound change is instead characterized by a holistic compression of the vowel space. This suggests that, in these California communities, the shift's unfolding was driven by articulatory and social, rather than purely phonological, factors. We propose that the analysis of the size and spread of holistic vowel space can help characterize the nature and motivations for vocalic changes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , July 2019 , pp. 193 - 217
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adank, Patti, Smits, Roel, & van Hout, Roeland. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116:3099–3107.10.1121/1.1795335Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. (2005). The Canadian Shift in Montreal. Language Variation and Change 17.2: 133–154.10.1017/S0954394505050064Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David. (2012). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer, version 5.3.07. Retrieved 4 March 2012 from www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Bond, Zinny S., & Moore, Thomas J. (1994). A note on the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speech. Speech Communication 14.4:325–337.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16: 645–668.Google Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R., Torretta, Gina M., & Pisoni, David B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication 20:255–272.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Amanda, Hall-Lew, Lauren, Kementchedjhieva, Yova & Purse, Ruaridh. (2016). Between California and the Pacific Northwest: The Front Lax Vowels in San Francisco English. Publication of the American Dialect Society (Speech in the western states, vol. 1: The coastal states) 101:33–54.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra, Elms, Ford, & Youssef, Amani. (1995). The Third Dialect of English: Some Canadian Evidence. Language Variation and Change 7.2:209–228.10.1017/S0954394500000995Google Scholar
Dinkin, Aaron. (2012). Toward a unified theory of chain shifting. In Nevalainen, T. & Traugott, E. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin & Kohn, Mary. (2012). The urban rejection of the vernacular: The SVS undone. Language Variation and Change 24:221–245.Google Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette. (2015). Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19:241–256.Google Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette, Eckert, Penelope, Podesva, Robert J., Pratt, Teresa, & Van Hofwegen, Janneke. (2016). The low vowels in California. Publication of the American Dialect Society (Speech in the western states, vol. 1: The coastal states) 101:11–32.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2008). Where Do Ethnolects Stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12:25–42.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2016). Variation, meaning, and social change. In Coupland, N. (Ed.) Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Labov, William. (2017). Phonetics, phonology and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21:467–496.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward. (1996.) Evidence for constraints on contrast: The dispersion theory of contrast. UCLA Working Papers in Phonology 1:86–106.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. (1999). A Majority Sound Change in a Minority Community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3.1:5–23.Google Scholar
Fox, Robert Allen, & Jacewicz, Ewa. (2017). Reconceptualizing the vowel space in analyzing regional dialect variation and sound change in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142:444–459.Google Scholar
Geenberg, Katherine. (2014). What it Means to be Norcal Country: Variation and Marginalization in Rural California. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Gick, Brian, Wilson, Ian, Koch, Karsten, & Cook, Clare. (2004). Language-Specific Articulatory Settings: Evidence from Inter-Utterance Rest Position. Phonetica 61:220–233.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. (2005). The Midwest and West. In Kortmann, B. & Schneider, E. (Eds.) Handbook of Varieties of English: The Americas and Caribbean, Vol I: Phonology, 338–350. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J.. (2011). Methodological and theoretical issues in the study of chain shifting. Language and Linguistics Compass 5:784–794.Google Scholar
Habick, Timothy. 1993. Farmer City, Illinois: sound systems shifting south. In Frazer, T. C. (Ed.) Heartland English: Variation and Transition in the American Middle West. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. 97–124.Google Scholar
Hagiwara, Robert. (1997). “Dialect Variation and Formant Frequency: The American English Vowels Revisited.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102:655–658.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. (2009). Ethnicity and Phonetic Variation in San Francisco English. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. (2010). Improved representation of variance in measures of vowel merger. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 9:060002.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan. (2006). An acoustic analysis of ‘happy-tensing’ in the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics 34:439–457.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Palethorpe, Sallyanne & Watson, Catherine. (2000). Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30:63–78.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Warren, Paul, & Drager, Katie. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34:458–484.Google Scholar
Heffernan, Kevin. (2010). Mumbling is macho: Phonetic distinctiveness in the speech of American radio DJs. American Speech 85:67–90.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Moonwomon, Birch, Bremner, Sue, Luthin, Herb, Van Clay, Mary, Lerner, Jean & Corcoran, Hazel. (1987). It's Not Just the Valley Girls: A study of California English. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 117–128.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert A., & Salmons, Joseph. (2007). Vowel space areas across dialects and gender. In Trouvain, J. & Barry, W. J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Saarbrueken: University of Saarland. 1465–1468.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler, & Fridland, Valerie. (2017). Regional relationships among the low vowels of U.S. English: Evidence from production and perception. Language Variation and Change 29:245–271.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler & Thomas, Erik R. (2012). Vowels: Vowel Manipulation, Normalization and Plotting. R package version 1.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vowels. Last accessed June 7, 2018.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Robert, & Grama, James. (2012). Chain Shifting and Centralization in California Vowels: An Acoustic Analysis. American Speech 87.1:39–56.Google Scholar
King, Sharese. (2015). On the negotiation of racial and regional identities: Vocalic Variation in African Americans from Bakersfield, California. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 44. Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
King, Sharese, & Calder, Jeremy. (2016). The Negotiation of Linguistic Blackness in a Non-Urban California Community. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 21. Murcia, Spain.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1963). The Social Motivation of a Sound Change. Word 18:1–42.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language 83:344–387.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2010). Principles of linguistic change, cognitive and cultural factors, Vol. 3. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon & Boberg, Charles. (2006). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Liljencrants, Johan, & Lindblom, Björn. (1972). Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast. Language 48:839–862.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. Speech production and speech modelling: 403–439. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. (1952). Function, Structure, and Sound Change. Word: 8:1–32.Google Scholar
McLarty, Jason, Kendall, Tyler, & Farrington, Charlie. (2016). Investigating the development of the contemporary Oregonian English vowel system. Publication of the American Dialect Society (Speech in the western states, vol. 1: The coastal states 101:135–157.Google Scholar
Nearey, Terrance. (1977). Phonetic feature system for vowels. Unpublished dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Nycz, Jennifer, & Hall-Lew, Lauren. (2013). Best practices in measuring vowel merger. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 20:060008.Google Scholar
Picheny, Michael A., Durlach, Nathaniel I., & Braida, Louis D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of speech and hearing research 29.4:434–446.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Bent, Tessa, Munson, Benjamin, Bradlow, Ann R., & Bailey, J. Michael. (2004). The influence of sexual orientation on vowel production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116:1905–1908.Google Scholar
Podesva., Robert J. (2011). The California Vowel Shift and Gay Identity. American Speech 86:32–51.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., D'Onofrio, Annette, Van Hofwegen, Janneke & Kim, Seung Kyung. (2015). “The California Vowel Shift and Fractal Recursivity in an Inland, Non-urban Community.” Language Variation and Change 27:157–186.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa & D'Onofrio, Annette. (2017). Jaw setting and the California Vowel Shift in parodic performance. Language in Society 46:283–312.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Last accessed 17 June 2018.Google Scholar
Ramanarayanan, Vikram, Goldstein, Louis, Byrd, Dani, & Narayanan, Shrikanth S. (2013). An investigation of articulatory setting using real-time magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 134:510–519.Google Scholar
Roeder, Rebecca V. & Gardner, Matt Hunt. (2013). The Phonology of the Canadian Shift Revisited: Thunder Bay and Cape Breton. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected papers from NWAV 41 19.2:161–170.Google Scholar
Roeder, Rebecca V., & Jarmasz, Lidia-Gabriela. (2010). The Canadian Shift in Toronto. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 55:387–404.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Fruehwald, Joe, Evanini, Keelan, & Yuan, Jiahong. (2011). FAVE Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction Program Suite. http://fave.ling.upenn.edu. Last accessed June 17, 2018.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Blondeau, Hélène. (2007). Language Change across the Lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83:560–588.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Wagner, Suzanne. (2011). Age grading in the Montréal inflected future. Language Variation and Change 23:275–313.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P., & Minkova, Donka. (1988). The English Vowel Shift: problems of coherence and explanation. Luick revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 355–394.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke. (2017). The systematicity of style: Investigating the full range of variation in everyday speech. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Wilson, Ian, & Gick, Brian. (2006). Articulatory Settings of French & English Monolinguals & Bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(5):3295.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo, & Wedel, Andrew. (2016). The Co-evolution of Speech and the Lexicon: The Interaction of Functional Pressures, Redundancy, and Category Variation. Topics in cognitive science 8:503–513.Google Scholar