Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:04:44.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Standards: Research into practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

Eileen W. Glisan
Eileen W. Glisan*
Affiliation:
Indiana University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century (SFLL) (National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project [NSFLEP]), originally published in 1996, were envisioned by many as the panacea for providing a new and exciting direction for foreign language education in the United States. The perceived impact of these National K-16 Student Standards has been witnessed throughout more than a decade by scholarly works that have acknowledged their role as ‘a veritable change agent’ (Sharpley-Whiting 1999: 84), ‘a vision for foreign language education in the new century’ (Allen 2002: 518), and, more recently, as ‘a blueprint and framework for change’ (Terry 2009: 17). The research that has been done on the Standards since their inception has attempted to provide concrete ways for the field to embrace this new framework and thereby realize a Standards-based curriculum and perhaps even revolutionize language education. This work has consisted largely of (1) implementational research (both with and without experimental design) that proposes specific strategies for addressing the Standards in planning, teaching, and assessment (Schwartz & Kavanaugh 1997; Abbott & Lear 2010); (2) survey research that analyzes self-reported information regarding teachers' pedagogical beliefs about the Standards and ways in which they claim to be addressing Standards in their classrooms (Allen 2002; ACTFL 2011), and (3) White papers that disseminate opinions and insights by leaders in the field regarding the impact that the Standards are having in areas such as language instruction, curriculum and course design, and educational policy (Sharpley-Whiting 1999; Donato 2009; Glisan 2010).

Type
Thinking Allowed
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 515 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A. & Lear, D. (2010). The Connections Goal Area in Spanish community service-learning: Possibilities and limitations. Foreign Language Annals 43, 231–245.Google Scholar
Abrate, J. (1999). Using authentic documents: Making connections to the wider world. In Nerenz, A. G. (ed.), Standards for a new century. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company, 75–88.Google Scholar
Adair-Hauck, B., Glisan, E. W., Koda, K, Swender, E. B. & Sandrock, P. (2006). The Integrated Performance Assessment (IPA): Connecting assessment to instruction and learning. Foreign Language Annals 39, 359–382.Google Scholar
Allen, L. Q. (2002). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and the Standards for Foreign Language Learning. Foreign Language Annals 35, 518–529.Google Scholar
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) (2010). Foreign language enrollments in K-12 public school: Are students prepared for a global society? Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) (2011). Decade of standards: Influence, impact. Survey report. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
Amores, M. & Medley, F. Jr. (1998). From rhetoric to reality: Applying AATSP to the Spanish classroom. In Terry, R. M. (ed.), Communications, Cultures, Connections, Comparisons, Communities: Dimension 98. Valdosta, GA: Southern Conference on Language Teaching, 1–18.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning 56, 9–49.Google Scholar
Curtain, H. & Dahlberg, C. A. (2010). Languages and children – Making the match: New languages for young learners, Grades K-8 (4th edn). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Darhower, M. (2006). Where's the community?: Bilingual internet chat and the ‘Fifth C’ of the national standards. Hispania 89, 84–98.Google Scholar
Donato, R. (2009). Teacher education in the age of standards of professional practice. The Modern Language Journal 93, 267–270.Google Scholar
Donato, R. & Brooks, F. B. (2004). Literary discussions and advanced speaking functions: Researching the (dis)connection. Foreign Language Annals 37, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R. & Tucker, G. R. (2007). K-12 language learning and foreign language educational policy: A school-based perspective. The Modern Language Journal 91, 256–258.Google Scholar
Donato, R. & Tucker, G. R. (2010). A tale of two schools: Developing sustainable early foreign language programs. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Donato, R., Tucker, G. R., Wudthayagorn, J. & Igarashi, K. (2000). Converging evidence: Attitudes, achievements, and instruction in the later years of FLES. Foreign Language Annals 33, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furman, N., Goldberg, D. & Lusin, N. (2009). Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education. New York: Modern Language Association (MLA).Google Scholar
Galloway, V. (1998). Constructing cultural realities: ‘Facts’ and frameworks of association. In Harper, J., Lively, M. & Williams, M. (eds.), The coming of age of the profession. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, 129–140.Google Scholar
Glisan, E. (2010). Using standards to prompt big ideas for language instruction. The Language Educator 5, 7.Google Scholar
Glisan, E., Phillips, J., Allen, H., Abbott, A. & Sauer, T. (2010). The lost C: The Communities goal area. Paper presented at the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages Conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Glisan, E. W., Uribe, D. & Adair-Hauck, B. (2007). Research on Integrated Performance Assessment at the post-secondary level: Student performance across the modes of communication. The Canadian Modern Language Review 64, 39–68.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. (1995). ‘Aw, man, where we goin’?’: Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics 6, 37–62.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. (1999). The communication standards. In Phillips, J. K. & Terry, R. M. (eds.). Foreign language standards: Linking research, theories, and practices. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC/Contemporary Publishing Group, 15–56.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. (2004). Language learning as an interactional achievement. The Modern Language Journal 88, 607–612.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. (2010). Interaction as method and result of language learning. Language Teaching 43, 202–215.Google Scholar
Hellermann, J. (2006). Classroom interactive practices for literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics 27, 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellermann, J. (2007). The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: Focus on task openings. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 83–96.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. M., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O. & Trong, K. L. (eds.) (2007). PIRLS 2006 encyclopedia: A guide to reading education in the forty PIRLS countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, School of Education, Boston College.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Academic Press, 413–468.Google Scholar
Magnan, S. S. (2007). Reconsidering communicative language teaching for national goals. The Modern Language Journal 91, 249–252.Google Scholar
Magnan, S. S. (2008). Reexamining the priorities of the National Standards for Foreign Language Education. Language Teaching 41, 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnan, S. S., Murphy, D. & Harris, S. (2011). Postsecondary student goals, expectations, and the U.S. Standards for Foreign Language Learning. Conference presentation at the American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Conference, 26 March 2011. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Mantero, M. (2006). Applied literacy in second language education: (Re)Framing discourse in literature-based classrooms. Foreign Language Annals 39, 99–114.Google Scholar
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (NSFLEP). (1996). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century (SFLL). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.Google Scholar
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (NSFLEP). (1999). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century (SFLL). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.Google Scholar
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (NSFLEP). (2006). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century (SFLL). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.Google Scholar
Pellettieri, J. (2011). Measuring language-related outcomes of community-based learning in intermediate Spanish courses. Hispania 94, 285–302.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. M. & Kavanaugh, M. S. (1997). Addressing the Culture goal with authentic video. In Phillips, J. K. (ed.), Collaborations: Meeting new goals, new realities. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company, 97–139.Google Scholar
Sharpley-Whiting, T. D. (1999). Postsecondary education and implications and uses of Standards for Foreign Language Learning. ADFL Bulletin 31, 84–85.Google Scholar
Shrum, J. L. & Glisan, E. W. (2010). Teacher's handbook: Contextualized language instruction (4th edn). Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
ter Horst, E. E. & Pearce, J. M (2010). Foreign languages and sustainability: Addressing the Connections, Communities, and Comparisons standards in higher education. Foreign Language Annals 43, 365–383.Google Scholar
Terry, R. M. (2009). The national Standards at the postsecondary level: A blueprint and framework for change. In Scott, V. M. (ed.), AAUSC 2009 Volume: Principles and practices of the Standards in college foreign language education. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning, 17–28.Google Scholar
Toth, P. D. (2004). When grammar instruction undermines cohesion in L2 Spanish classroom discourse. The Modern Language Journal 88, 14–30.Google Scholar
Toth, P. D. (2010). Social and cognitive factors in making teacher-led classroom discourse relevant for second language development. The Modern Language Journal 95, 1–25.Google Scholar
US Department of Education (2009). The race to the top begins – Remarks by Secretary Arne Duncan. www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/07/07242009.html.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G. & McTigh, J., (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Zyzik, E. & Polio, C. (2008). Incidental focus on form in university Spanish literature courses. The Modern Language Journal 92, 53–70.Google Scholar