Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:17:22.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language, power and identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Ruth Wodak
Ruth Wodak*
Affiliation:
University of Lancaster, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How are identities constructed in discourse? How are national and European identities tied to language and communication? And what role does power have – power in discourse, over discourse and of discourse? This paper seeks to identify and analyse processes of identity construction within Europe and at its boundaries, particularly the diversity of sources and forms of expression in several genres and contexts. It draws on media debates on Austrian versus Standard High German, on focus group discussions with migrants in eight European countries and on public and political debates on citizenship in the European Union which screen newly installed language tests. The analysis of different genres and publics all illustrate the complexity of national and transnational identity constructions in a globalised world. What is experienced as European or as outside of Europe is the result of multiple activities, some of them consciously planned in the sense of political, economic or cultural intervention, others more hidden, indirect, in the background. Such developments are contradictory rather than harmonious, proceeding in ‘loops’ and partial regressions (rather than in a linear, uni-directional or teleological way). Thus, an interdisciplinary approach suggests itself which accounts for diverse context-dependent discursive and social practices.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 215 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. W. (1966). Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T. & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press. Discourse & Society 19.3, 273–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauböck, R., Ersboll, E., Groenendijk, K. & Waldrauch, H. (eds.) (2006). Acquisition and loss of nationality: Policies and trends in 15 European states. Project report, Institute for European Integration Research. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauböck, R. & Wallace Goodman, S. (2010). Naturalisation. EUDO CITIZENSHIP Policy Brief No. 2. Florence: European University Institute (http://eudo-citizenship.eu/docs/policy-brief-naturalisation_revised.pdf).Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (1999). The debate is open. In Blommaert, J. (ed.), Language ideological debates. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cap, P. & Okulska, U. (eds.) (2010). Perspectives in politics and discourse Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carrera, S. (2006). A comparison of integration programmes in the EU: trends and weaknesses. Challenge Papers No.1. Centre for European Policy Studies: Brussels.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse. Theory and practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, H. (1991). Fremdsprachenunterricht für das Jahr 2000. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Christ, H. (1995). Sprachenpolitische Perspektiven. In Bausch, K-R., Christ, H. & Krumm, H.-J. (eds.), Handbuch Fremdsprachenunterricht (3rd edn). Tübingen: Niemeyer, 75–81.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (2003). Towards inter-cultural communication in Europe without linguistic homogenization. In de Cillia, R., Krumm, H.-J. & Wodak, R. (eds.), 39–48.Google Scholar
De Cillia, R. (1998). Burenwurscht bleibt Burenwurscht: Sprachenpolitik und gesellschaftliche Mehrsprachigkeit in Österreich. Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
De Cillia, R. (2006). „Sieg im Marmeladekrieg” – Das Protokoll Nr. 10 zehn Jahre danach. In Fill, A., Marko, G., Newby, D. & Penz, H. (eds.), Linguists (don't) only talk about it. Essays in Honour of Bernhard Kettemann. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 123–139.Google Scholar
De Cillia, R., Krumm, H.-J. & Wodak, R. (eds.) (2003). The costs of multilingualism: Globalisation and linguistic diversity. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
De Cillia, R. & Wodak, R. (2006). Ist Osterreich ein ‘deutsches’ Land? Sprachenpolitik und Identität in der zweiten Republik. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.Google Scholar
De Cillia, R. & Wodak, R. (eds.) (2009). Gedenken im ‘Gedankenjahr’. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.Google Scholar
Delanty, G., Wodak, R. & Jones, P. (eds.) (2008). Migration, identity, and belonging. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EUDO – The European Union Democracy Observatory on Citizenship. European University Institute: Florence (http://eudo-citizenship.eu/)Google Scholar
European Commission (1995). White Paper on Education and Training COM (1995) 590, Brussels 3/11/1995.Google Scholar
European Commission (2005). A new framework strategy for multilingualism. COM (2005) 596, Brussels 22/11/2005.Google Scholar
European Commission (2007). Framework for the European survey on language competences. COM (2007) 184, Brussels 13/04/2007.Google Scholar
European Commission (2008). Multilingualism: An asset for Europe and a shared commitment. COM (2008) 566, Brussels 18/09/2008.Google Scholar
Extramiana, C. & Van Avermaet, P. (2010). Enquête, PowerPoint Presentation, Intergovernmental Conference in Strasbourg, 24–25 June, 2010. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Programme2010_Texts-MigrantsConf_EN.asp.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M. & Leiber, S. (2005). Complying with Europe. EU harmonisation and soft law in the member states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farfán, J. A. & Holzscheiter, A. (2010). The power of discourse and the discourse of power. In Wodak, R., Johnstone, B. & Kerswill, P. (eds.), 139–152.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1982 [1930]). Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. In Freud, S. (ed.), Fragen der Gesellschaft: Ursprünge der Religion. Studienausgabe, Vol. 9, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 191–270.Google Scholar
Gal, S. (2006). Migration, minorities and multilingualism. In Mar-Molinero, C. & Stevenson, P. (eds.), 13–28.Google Scholar
Gal, S. (2010). Linguistic regimes and European diversity. Keynote Lecture, Conference ‘New Challenges for Multilingualism in Europe’, Dubrovnik, 12 April, 2010.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1978). Selections from political writings (1921–1926); with additional texts by other Italian communist leaders. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Holzscheiter, A. (2005). Power of discourse and power in discourse. An investigation of transformation and exclusion in the global discourse of childhood. Ph.D. Thesis, FU, Berlin.Google Scholar
Jenkins, B. (ed.) (1996). Nation and identity in contemporary Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, P. & Krzyżanowski, M. (2008). Migrant belongings. In Delanty, G. et al. (eds.), 84–109.Google Scholar
Klemperer, V. (2005). The language of the Third Reich: LTI. Lingua Tertii Imperii. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. (2010). The discursive construction of European identities: A multi-level approach to discourse and identity in the transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. & Wodak, R. (2007). Multiple identities, migration, and belonging: Voices of migrants. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. & Iedema, R. (eds.), Identity troubles. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 95–119.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. & Wodak, R. (2009). The politics of exclusion: Debating migration in Austria. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. & Wodak, R. (2011). Political strategies and language policies: The European Union Lisbon Strategy and its implications for the EU Language and Multilingualism Policy. Language Policy (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, C. (2010). Language teaching and language assessment. In Wodak, R., Johnstone, B. & Kerswill, P. (eds.), 545–564.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (2005 [1974]). Power: A radical view. (2nd edn) Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L. & Grad, H. (2008). Identities in discourse: An integrative view. In Dolón, R. & Todolí, J. (eds.), Analysing identities in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–28.Google Scholar
Mar-Molinero, C. & Stevenson, P. (eds.) (2006). Language, ideologies, policies and practices: Language and the future of Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modood, T., Triandafyllidou, A. & Zapata-Barrero, R. (eds.) (2006). Multiculturalism, Muslims and citizenship: A European approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, R. (2003). English-only Europe? Challenging language policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piller, I. & Takahashi, K. (2010). Language, migration, and human rights. In Wodak, R., Johnstone, B. & Kerswill, P. (eds.), 583–598.Google Scholar
Ricento, T. (ed.) (2005). An introduction to language policy. Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Triandafyllidou, A. & Wodak, R. (2003). Conceptual and methodological questions in the study of collective identity: An introduction. Journal of Language and Politics 2.2, 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandafyllidou, A., Wodak, R. & Krzyżanowski, M. (eds.) (2009). European media and the European public sphere. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, J. W. (2009). The discursive construction of Scots. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Linguistics and English Language: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Van Avermaet, P. (2010). Language requirements for adult migrants – Results of a survey. Observations and challenges. PowerPoint presentation, Intergovernmental conference, Strasbourg, 24–25 June, 2010. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Programme2010_Texts-MigrantsConf_EN.aspGoogle Scholar
Weil, P. (2001). Access to citizenship: A comparison of twenty-five nationality laws. In Aleinikoff, T. A. & Klusmeyer, D. (eds.), Citizenship today: global perspectives and practices. MPI Publications, 17–35.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2003). Multiple identities: The roles of female parliamentarians in the EU parliament. In Holmes, J. & Meyerhoff, M. (eds.), Handbook of discourse and gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 671–698.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2004). National and transnational identities: European and other identities constructed in interviews with EU officials. In Hermann, R. K., Risse, T. & Brewer, M. B. (eds.), Transnational identities. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 97–128.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2007). Discourses in European Union organizations: Aspects of access, participation, and exclusion. TEXT and TALK 27.5–6, 655–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2009a). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2009b). Language and Politics. In Culpeper, J., Katamba, F., Kerswill, P., Wodak, R. & McEnery, T. (eds.), English language: Description, variation and context. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 576–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. & Liebhart, K. (2009 [1999]). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies 7.1, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., Johnstone, B. & Kerswill, P. (eds.) (2010). The SAGE handbook of sociolinguistics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. & Köhler, K. (2010). Wer oder was ist „fremd’? Diskurshistorische Analyse fremdenfeindlicher Rhetorik in Österreich. Sozialwissenschaftliche Studien-Rundschau 1, 33–55.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. & Krzyżanowski, M. (2011). Language in political institutions of multilingual states and the European Union. In Auwera, P. & Kortmann, J. (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. & Weiss, G. (2005). European identities. Theories and applications. In Wodak, R. & Chilton, P. (eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis. Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (2004). Language policy and language planning: From nationalism to globalisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (2010). The elephant in the room: Language issues in the European Union. European Journal of Language Policy 1.2, 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wodak Supplementary Figure 1

Wodak Supplementary Figure 1

Download Wodak Supplementary Figure 1(PDF)
PDF 89.3 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Wodak Supplementary Figure 2

Wodak Supplementary Figure 2

Download Wodak Supplementary Figure 2(PDF)
PDF 333.4 KB