Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:09:13.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Red Wines of Médoc: What is Wine Tasting Worth?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Victor Ginsburgh*
Affiliation:
ECARES, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50, Av. F.D. Roosevelt, CP 114/04, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Muriel Monzak
Affiliation:
ECARES, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50, Av. F.D. Roosevelt, CP 114/04, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Andras Monzak
Affiliation:
ECARES, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50, Av. F.D. Roosevelt, CP 114/04, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.

Abstract

Winemaking is a highly complex technology. It needs inputs over which there is no control (good weather conditions), initial endowments which can hardly be modified (soil, exposure of the slopes), inputs which take 20 to 30 years before producing good quality outputs (vines), manual operations (picking), mechanical operations (crushing, racking) and chemical processes (during fermentation). In the paper, we disentangle the production technology, and try to quantify the impact on prices (qualities) of each of the many inputs (including weather conditions) and steps used in producing wine in Médoc. We show that technology and weather conditions are able to explain two thirds of the variance of prices; when reputation effects (based on the wine classification made in 1855) are included, this proportion rises to almost 85%. This suggests either that “classified” producers are able to charge higher prices, or that the classification is a measure of quality reflected by prices. We also show that two of the more recent attempts at classifying wines are not as good at explaining prices than the official (and old) 1855 classification. (JEL Classification: L66, Z19, C5, D4)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This is a printed version of a paper that was presented at the Vineyard Data Quantification Society in Verona in 1992. We are grateful to the owners, managers and régisseurs of 102 out of the 104 châteaux visited for their kindness and the time they spent in answering the questions included in our survey; their names appear in Appendix 1. The Institut de Météorologie Française in Mérignac-Cissac was kind enough to provide the data on weather conditions. We are largely indebted to Luc Bauwens and Jean Waelbroeck for excellent comments and recommendations on the testing procedures of Section VI. We also thank Albert di Vittorio, Marjorie Gassner, Cécile Guasch and Moncef Hadhri for many helpful discussions.

References

Ashenfelter, O. (1989). How auctions work for wine and art. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 2336.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O. and Storchmann, K. (2010). Using a hedonic model of solar radiation to assess the economic effect of climate change: the case of Mosel valley vineyards. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 333349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R., Plantiga, A. and Stavins, R. (2011). The value of terroir: hedonic estimation of vineyard sales prices. The Journal of Wine Economics, 6, 114.Google Scholar
Dussert-Gerber, P. (1988). Guide des Vins de France 1989. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Gergaud, O. and Ginsburgh, V. (2010). Endowments, production technologies and the quality of wines in Bordeaux. Does terroir matter? Journal of Wine Economics, 5, 321.Google Scholar
Gourieroux, C. and Monfort, A. (1989). Statistique et Modèles Econométriques. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Kugler, P. and Kugler, C. (2010). Parker, Wine Spectator and Retail Prices of Bordeaux Wines in Switzerland: Results from Panel Data 1995–2000. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Zentrum der Universität Basel, WWZ Working Paper, Vol 10. Online available at http://wwz.unibas.ch/uploads/tx_x4epublication/Parker__Wine_Spectaor_and_Retail_Prices_August_2010_1.pdf (November 2012).Google Scholar
Landon, S. and Smith, C. (1998). Quality expectations, reputation, and price. Southern Economic Journal, 64(3): 628647.Google Scholar
Lichine, A. (1963). Wines of France. 6th ed.London: Cassel and Company.Google Scholar
Liv-Ex Fine Wine Market Blog (2011). 2011 Liv-ex Bordeaux Classification. Online at http://www.blog.liv-ex.com/2011/05/2011-liv-ex-bordeaux-classification.html (November 2012).Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. (1985). Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malter, D. (2012). Essays on high-status fallacies. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Management and Organization, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland. Available online at http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/12623/1/Malter_umd_0117E_13003.pdf (November 2012).Google Scholar
Markham, D. (1998). 1855: A History of the Bordeaux Classification. New York, University of Pennsylvania, Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Nerlove, M. (1992). Do more expensive wines taste better? A hedonic analysis of Swedish data. Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania, March.Google Scholar
Parker, R.M. (1985). Bordeaux, The Definitive Guide for the Wines Produced since 1961. New-York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Parker, R.M. (1990). Les Vins de Bordeaux. Paris: Solar.Google Scholar
Steinberger, M. (2005). Making the list. How the most important rankings in wine became irrelevant. Slate Magazine, June 17. Online available at http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/wines_world/2005/06/making_the_list.html (November 2012).Google Scholar
Thompson, G. and Mutkoski, S.A. (2011). Reconsidering the 1855 Bordeaux classification of the Medoc and Graves using wine ratings from 1970–2005. Journal of Wine Economics, 6, 1536.Google Scholar