Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:21:01.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identifying hotspots of chimpanzee group activity from transect surveys in Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2011

Célestin Yao Kouakou ,
Christophe Boesch  and
Hjalmar S. Kuehl
Célestin Yao Kouakou*
Affiliation:
Unité de Formation et Recherches des Sciences de la Nature, Université d'Abobo-Adjamé, Abidjan Côte-d'Ivoire Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte-d'Ivoire, Abidjan Côte-d'Ivoire Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, LeipzigGermany Wild Chimpanzee Foundation, Abidjan Côte-d'Ivoire
Christophe Boesch
Affiliation:
Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, LeipzigGermany Wild Chimpanzee Foundation, Abidjan Côte-d'Ivoire
Hjalmar S. Kuehl
Affiliation:
Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, LeipzigGermany
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Locating activity hotspots – areas of higher density, more intense use, or distinct social units – is a prerequisite for answering many questions in animal ecology. However, for many species, carrying out such research from direct observations in tropical habitat is time-consuming and unrealistic for non-habituated animals. This study aimed to locate chimpanzee home ranges from transect nest counts. For validation purposes, 233 line transects were sampled within the home ranges of four habituated social groups of chimpanzees in Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire. In total, 373 km of transects were surveyed over 188 days and 683 nests of chimpanzee were recorded. First, we characterized heterogeneity of nest distribution patterns, including variation in density and group size within the area. Second, we used scan statistics, a likelihood-based cluster technique to locate chimpanzee social groups and compared them with the known home range boundaries. Chimpanzee nest distribution was characterized by a positive density and group-size gradient away from the range periphery. Furthermore, nest distribution clusters corresponding to the four groups could be successfully identified, although additional clusters for, for example, low-density areas between social groups seem to be an unavoidable by-product. The approach taken can be extended to a wide spectrum of data stemming from direct observations, camera traps, acoustic or genetic sampling to derive information about structure and patchiness of wild animal populations.

Keywords

binomial modelclusterline transectsnest surveysPan troglodytesPoisson modelrange boundariesscan statisticsspatial gradient
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , November 2011 , pp. 621 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

AZPURUA, M. & DOS RAMOS, K. 2010. A comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimation of average electromagnetic field magnitude. Progress in Electromagnetics Research M 14:135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BENADI, G., FICHTEL, C. & KAPPELER, P. 2008. Intergroup relations and home range use in Verreaux's Sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi). American Journal of Primatology 70:1–10.Google Scholar
BOESCH, C. 2008. Why do chimpanzees die in the forest? The challenges of understanding and controlling for wild ape health. American Journal of Primatology 70:722–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BOESCH, C. & BOESCH-ACHERMANN, H. 2000. The chimpanzees of the Taï Forest: behavioural ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 316 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOESCH, C., KOHOU, G., NENE, H. & VIGILANT, L. 2006. Male competition and paternity in wild chimpanzees of the Tai forest. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 130:103–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BOESCH, C., CROCKFORD, C., HERBINGER, I., WITTIG, R., MOEBIUS, Y. & NORMAND, E. 2008. Intergroup conflicts among chimpanzees in Tai National Park: lethal violence and the female perspective. American Journal of Primatology 70:519–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BOUSQUET, B. 1978. Un parc de forêt dense en Afrique. Le parc national de Taï (Côte d'Ivoire). Bois et forêts des tropiques 179:27–46.Google Scholar
BROWN, J. H., MEHLMAN, D. W. & STEVENS, G. C. 1995. Spatial variation in abundance. Ecology 76:2028–2043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUCKLAND, S. T., ANDERSON, D. R., BURNHAM, K. P., LAAKE, J. L., BORCHERS, D. L. & THOMAS, L. 2001. Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford. 432 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURT, W. H. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 24:346–352.Google Scholar
CHAPMAN, C. A., CHAPMAN, L. J. & MCLAUGHLIN, R. L. 1989. Multiple central place foraging by spider monkeys: travel consequences of using many sleeping sites. Oecologia 79:506–511.Google Scholar
DEMATTEÏ, C., MOLINARI, N. & DAURÈS, J.-P. 2007. Arbitrarily shaped multiple spatial cluster detection for case event data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51:3931–3945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEVOS, C., SANZ, C., MORGAN, D., ONONONGA, J. R., LAPORTE, N. & HUYNEN, M. C. 2008. Comparing ape densities and habitats in northern Congo: surveys of sympatric gorillas and chimpanzees in the Odzala and Ndoki regions. American Journal of Primatology 70:439–451.Google Scholar
DOBSON, A. J. 2002. An introduction to generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. 225 pp.Google Scholar
FARAWAY, J. 2006. Extending the linear model with R. Generalized mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. 301 pp.Google Scholar
GORDON, D. M. 1997. The population consequences of territorial behaviour. Tree 12:63–67.Google ScholarPubMed
HASHIMOTO, C. 1995. Population census of the chimpanzees in the Kalinzu forest, Uganda – comparison between methods with nest counts. Primates 36:477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HERBINGER, I., BOESCH, C. & ROTHE, H. 2001. Territory characteristics among three neighboring chimpanzee communities in the Tai National Park, Cote d'Ivoire. International Journal of Primatology 22:143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLT, R. D. 1984. Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions and the coexistence of prey species. American Naturalist 124:337–406.Google Scholar
JAMES, R. N. I. 2009. The origin of spaces: understanding residential satisfaction from ape nests, human cultures and the hierarchy of natural housing functions. Housing Theory and Society 26:295–297.Google Scholar
KOUAKOU, Y. C., BOESCH, C. & KUEHL, H. 2009. Estimating chimpanzee population size with nest counts: validating methods in Taï national park. American Journal of Primatology 71:447–457.Google Scholar
KULLDORF, M. 1997. A spatial scan statistic. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 26:1481–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KULLDORF, M. & NAGARWALLA, N. 1995. Spatial disease clusters: detection and inference. Statistics in Medicine 14:799–810.Google Scholar
LEENDERTZ, F. H., PAULI, G., MAETZ-RENSING, K., BOARDMANE, W., NUNN, C., ELLERBROK, H., JENSEN, S. A., JUNGLEN, S. & BOESCH, C. 2006. Pathogens as drivers of population declines: the importance of systematic monitoring in great apes and other threatened mammals. Biological Conservation 131:325–337.Google Scholar
LEHMANN, J. & BOESCH, C. 2003. Social influences on ranging patterns among chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in the Tai National Park, Cote d'Ivoire. Behavioral Ecology 14:642–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LI, J. & HEAP, A. D. 2008. A review of spatial interpolation methods for environmental scientists. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. 137 pp.Google Scholar
LOPEZ-SEPULCRE, A. & KOKKO, H. 2005. Territorial defense, territory size, and population regulation. American Naturalist 166:317–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LORTIE, C. J., ELLIS, E., NOVOPLANSKY, A. & TURKINGTON, R. 2005. Implications of spatial pattern and local density on community-level interactions. Oikos 109:495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAESTRE, F. T., ESCUDERO, A., MARTINEZ, I., GUERRERO, C. & RUBIO, A. 2005. Does spatial pattern matter to ecosystem functioning? Insights from biological soil crusts. Functional Ecology 19:566–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MITANI, J. C. 2006. Demographic influences on the behavior of chimpanzees. Primates 47:6–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MOHR, C. O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. American Midland Naturalist 37:223–249.Google Scholar
NAVEAU, P. & ALLARD, D. 2005. Modeling skewness in spatial data analyis without data transformation. Pp. 929–937 in Leuangthong, O. & Deutsch, C. V. (ed.). Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
NUNN, C. L., THRALLD, P. H., BARTZE, K., DASGUPTAE, T. & BOESCH, C. 2009. Do transmission mechanisms or social systems drive cultural dynamics in socially structured populations? Animal Behaviour 77:1515–1524.Google Scholar
PLUMPTRE, A. J. & REYNOLDS, V. 1996. Censusing chimpanzees in the Budongo Forest, Uganda. International Journal of Primatology 17:85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QUIATT, D. & HUFFMANN, M. A. 1993. On home bases, nesting sites, activity centers and new analytic perspectives. Current Anthropology 34:68–70.Google Scholar
RIEZEBOS, E. P., VOOREN, A. P. & GUILLAUMET, J. L. (eds.) 1994. Le Parc National de Taï, Côte d'Ivoire. I: Synthèse des connaissances. II: Bibliographie. Tropenbos Série 8, Wageningen. 322 pp.Google Scholar
SEAMAN, D. E. & POWELL, R. A. 1996. An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77:2075–2085.Google Scholar
SMITH, G. C. 2006. Persistence of disease in territorial animals: insights from spatial models of bovine tuberculosis. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 30:35–41.Google Scholar
TELEKI, G., HUNT, E. E. & PFIFFERLING, J. H. 1976. Demographic observations (1963–1973) on chimpanzees of Gombe-National-Park, Tanzania. Journal of Human Evolution 5:559–598.Google Scholar
THOMAS, L., BUCKLAND, S. T., BURNHAM, K. P., ANDERSON, D. R., LAAKE, J. L., BORCHERS, D. L. & STRINDBERG, S. 2002. Distance sampling. Pp. 544–552 in El-Shaarawi, A. H. & Piegorsch, W. W. (ed.). Encyclopedia of environmetrics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
TOBLER, M. W. S., CARRILLO-PERCASTEGUI, E., LEITE PITMAN, R., MARES, R. & POWELL, G. 2008. An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11:169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TUTIN, C. E. G. & FERNANDEZ, M. 1984. Nationwide census of Gorilla (Gorilla g. gorilla) and chimpanzee (Pan t. troglodytes) populations in Gabon. American Journal of Primatology 6:313–336.Google Scholar
WARDEN, C. R. 2008. Comparison of Poisson and Bernoulli spatial cluster analyses of pediatric injuries in a fire district. International Journal of Health Geographics 7:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WATTS, D. P., MULLER, M., AMSLER, S. J., MBABAZI, J. & MITANI, J. 2006. Lethal intergroup aggression by chimpanzees in Kibale national park, Uganda. American Journal of Primatology 68:161–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WILSON, M. L., HAUSER, M. D. & WRANGHAM, R. W. 2007. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) modify grouping and vocal behaviour in response to location-specific risk. Behaviour 144:1621–1653.Google Scholar