No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The ASCAP-BMI Feud, Status Panic, and the Struggle for Cold War Consensus
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2021
Abstract
By the 1950s, ASCAP and its associated songwriters and composers seemed out of touch with contemporary musical tastes and industry trends. With the introduction of competition in the form of BMI in 1939, many members of ASCAP were experiencing a sense of status anxiety, an anxiety exacerbated by the many cultural, social, political, and economic changes that swept across postwar US society. Rather than adapt to the changing musical landscape of the 1950s, some members argued that ASCAP's fading cultural prestige and diminished influence within the music industry were the result of a conspiracy perpetrated by the broadcast networks and BMI. This article examines how, in an attempt to reassert the status and prestige they had enjoyed before the war, ASCAP and its supporters exploited contemporary Cold War anxieties as part of their ongoing feud with BMI. In congressional hearings from 1956 and 1958, individuals and organizations sympathetic to ASCAP portrayed BMI as part of a coordinated conspiracy that not only threatened free market practices through the establishment of an alleged “electronic curtain,” but also sought to foist an inferior product on audiences who were being manipulated by “hidden persuaders.” I suggest that the rhetoric that dominated both of these hearings reflects ideological debates that were being fought at the height of the Cold War, debates involving the culture of consensus and the image of the “American Way.”
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Music
References
Acland, Charles R. Swift Viewing: The Popular Life of Subliminal Influence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Amendment to Communications Act of 1934 (Prohibiting Radio and Television Stations from Engaging in Music Publishing or Recording Business). Hearings before the Subcommittee on Communications of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, United States Senate, Eighty-Fifth Congress, Second Session, on S. 2834. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1958.Google Scholar
“Anchored VOA ‘Courier’ Programs Begin.” Broadcasting Telecasting, September 15, 1952, 76.Google Scholar
Ansari, Emily Abrams. “Musical Americanism, Cold War Consensus Culture, and the U.S.-USSR Composers’ Exchange, 1958–60.” Musical Quarterly 97, no. 3 (Fall 2014): 360–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“ASCAP May Boost Revenue by $1 Million This Year.” Broadcasting Telecasting, October 12, 1953, 44.Google Scholar
“ASCAP's War on BMI.” Broadcasting Telecasting, September 9, 1957, 60–62, 64–66, 68.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, and Lipset, Seymour Martin, eds. Class, Status, and Power: A Reader in Social Stratification. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Bill S. 2834. Senate of the States, United. 85th Congress, 1st Session, 21 August, 1957.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Susan L. Cold War Captives, Imprisonment, Escape, and Brainwashing. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, William H., ed. The Achievement of American Liberalism: The New Deal and Its Legacies. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Congressional Record. Senate of the United States. 85th Congress, 1st Session, August 21, 1957.Google Scholar
DeCurtis, Anthony, ed. Present Tense: Rock & Roll and Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul. Review of The Production of Culture in the Music Industry: The ASCAP-BMI Controversy, by John Ryan. Administrative Science Quarterly 32, no. 4 (December 1987): 607–9.Google Scholar
Dunne, Matthew W. A Cold War State of Mind: Brainwashing and Postwar American Society. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2009.Google Scholar
“Editorial: Lame, Halt & Blind.” Billboard, November 30, 1959, 2.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Reappraisal of American National Security Policy During the Cold War. Rev. and expanded ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hajduk, John C. Music Wars: Money, Politics, and Race in the Construction of Rock and Roll Culture, 1940–1960. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2018.Google Scholar
Hall, Mildred. “SPA Cleffers Chant ‘Conspiracy’ Charge.” Billboard, March 9, 1957, 22.Google Scholar
Higham, John. “The Cult of the ‘American Consensus’: Homogenizing Our History.” Commentary 27, no. 2 (February 1959): 93–100.Google Scholar
Hill, Trent. “The Enemy Within: Censorship in Rock Music in the 1950s.” In Present Tense: Rock & Roll and Culture, edited by DeCurtis, Anthony, 39–71. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Godfrey. America in Our Time: From WWII to Nixon, What Happened and Why. New York: Vintage Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. “The Pseudo-Conservative Revolt.” In The New American Right, edited by Bell, Daniel, 33–55. New York: Criterion Books, 1955.Google Scholar
Horowitz, IS. “$150,000,000 Suit Asks Broadcaster-BMI Divorce.” Billboard, November 14, 1953, 1, 17, 45.Google Scholar
Hugunin, Marc. “ASCAP, BMI and the Democratization of American Popular Music.” Popular Music and Society 7, no. 1 (1979): 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Edward. Brain-Washing in Red China: The Calculated Destruction of Men's Minds. New York: Vanguard Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Kohler, Foy D. “This Is the Voice of America … .” Cathode Press 9, no. 3 (1952): 8–13, 28–29.Google Scholar
Lawson, Steven F. “Race, Rock and Roll, and the Rigged Society: The Payola Scandal and the Political Culture of the 1950s.” In The Achievement of American Liberalism: The New Deal and Its Legacies, edited by Chafe, William H., 205–42. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. “The Sources of the ‘Radical Right.’” In The New American Right, edited by Bell, Daniel, 166–233. New York: Criterion Books, 1955.Google Scholar
May, Elaine Tyler. Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. Revised edition. New York: Basic Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Melley, Timothy. Empire of Conspiracy: The Culture of Paranoia in Postwar America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. White Collar: The American Middle Classes. New York: Oxford University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Monopoly Problems in Regulated Industries. Hearings Before the Antitrust Subcommittee (Subcommittee No. 5) of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Eighty-Fourth Congress, Second Session, Serial 22. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1957.Google Scholar
Nadel, Alan. Containment Culture: American Narratives, Postmodernism, and the Atomic Age. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasley, Virginia. 21 Stayed: The Story of the American GI's Who Chose Communist China—Who They Were and Why They Stayed. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Cudahy, 1955.Google Scholar
Reisman, David, Glazer, Nathan, and Denney, Reuel. The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Ryan, John. The Production of Culture in the Music Industry: The ASCAP-BMI Controversy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1985.Google Scholar
Sanjek, Russell. Pennies From Heaven: The American Popular Music Business in the Twentieth Century. Updated by David Sanjek. New York: Da Capo Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Seed, David. Brainwashing: The Fictions of Mind Control. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Segrave, Kerry. Payola in the Music Industry: A History, 1880–1991. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1994.Google Scholar
“Songsmiths Do Solo on $150,000,000 Suit; Touch Off Music-Radio Discord.” Variety, November 11, 1953, 1, 50.Google Scholar
“Songwriters’ Suit Seeks End to NARTB, $150 Million.” Broadcasting Telecasting, November 16, 1953, 34, 38.Google Scholar
Wall, Wendy L. Inventing the “American Way”: The Politics of Consensus from the New Deal to the Civil Rights Movement. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar