^{page 1100 note 1} p. 27.

^{page 1101 note 1} pp. 33, 34.

^{page 1101 note 2} Compare the antitheses of Gorgias in the Helen and his fondness for verbal jingles.

^{page 1102 note 1} pp. 8–11.

^{page 1102 note 2} This date he accepts from Kern, Manual of Indian Buddhism, p. 129Google Scholar; Müller, Max, Six Systems, p. 477Google Scholar. But the date is probably too late. Cf. p. 1091.

^{page 1102 note 3} p. 78, n. 7, agreeing with Krishnamachariar in his Introd. pp. 36–8.

^{page 1102 note 4} JRAS. 1909, pp. 138 seq.Google Scholar

^{page 1103 note 1} Accepted by Jacobi, , JAOS. xxxi, 2 seq.Google Scholar

^{page 1103 note 2} JRAS. 1914, pp. 603–7.Google Scholar

^{page 1103 note 3} Medieval School of Indian Logic, p. 105.Google Scholar

^{page 1103 note 4} Kādambarī ², pp. 101–4Google Scholar; so Weber, , SBA. xxxvii, 917.Google Scholar

^{page 1104 note 1} The cases of homoioteleuta, alliteration, parisosis, and strained compounds referred to by Gray, , p. 36Google Scholar, are wholly incomparable with the Sanskrit uses; the Greek authors have a few instances as special ornaments; the Sanskrit essentially depends on them.

^{page 1104 note 2} Rohde, , Griechischer Roman ², p. 593Google Scholar; see Gray, , p. 96, n. 14.Google Scholar

^{page 1104 note 3} JAOS. xvi, pp. clxxii–iii.Google Scholar

^{page 1104 note 4} KZ. xlv, 134–5.Google Scholar