Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T12:03:13.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reviews on Indian Subjects - 4. Āryavidyāsudhākara, or a Compendium of Hindu Philosophy and Ritual by Yajñneśvara Cimaṇa Bhaṭṭa. Edited, with notes, by Mahāmahopādhyāya Paṇḍita Śivadatta D. Kudāla. 9¾ × 6½, 4 + 139 pp. (The Punjab Sanskrit Series, No. 3.) Lahore: The Punjab Sanskrit Book Depot, 1923. - 5. Arthaśāstra of Kauṭilya. A New Edition by J. Jolly and R. Schmidt. Vol. i, 8½ × 5½, 47 + vi + 272 pp. (The Punjab Sanskrit Series, No. 4.) Lahore: The Punjab Sanskrit Book Depot, 1923.

Review products

4. Āryavidyāsudhākara, or a Compendium of Hindu Philosophy and Ritual by Yajñneśvara Cimaṇa Bhaṭṭa. Edited, with notes, by Mahāmahopādhyāya Paṇḍita Śivadatta D. Kudāla. 9¾ × 6½, 4 + 139 pp. (The Punjab Sanskrit Series, No. 3.) Lahore: The Punjab Sanskrit Book Depot, 1923.
5. Arthaśāstra of Kauṭilya. A New Edition by J. Jolly and R. Schmidt. Vol. i, 8½ × 5½, 47 + vi + 272 pp. (The Punjab Sanskrit Series, No. 4.) Lahore: The Punjab Sanskrit Book Depot, 1923.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

J. Charpentier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , April 1925 , pp. 366 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Geschichte der indischen Literatur, iii.

2 The arguments on which Professor Keith has lately tried to advocate a far later date for Viśākhadatta are purely negative and seem to me wholly inconclusive.

3 The latest discussion on this subject by Professor Edgerton (The. Pancatantra Reconstructed, ii, p. 182) brings no new arguments for deciding the question.