^{page 1090 note 1} Gött. Nach. 1901, pp. 460–84.Google Scholar

^{page 1090 note 2} JAOS. xxxi, 1 seqq.Google Scholar

^{page 1091 note 1} Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient, iv, 53 seqq.Google Scholar

^{page 1091 note 2} Op. cit. xi, 355–61. See Franke, , JRAS. 1914, pp. 398–401Google Scholar; Thomas, , pp. 748, 749.Google Scholar

^{page 1091 note 3} JRAS. 1914, pp. 603–7.Google Scholar

^{page 1092 note 1} Cf. Thomas, , JRAS. 1913, p. 1033.Google Scholar

^{page 1092 note 2} JAOS. xxxi, 2, n. 1.Google Scholar

^{page 1092 note 3} Published in JASB. 1898.Google Scholar

^{page 1092 note 4} See Bhattacharya, Vidhushekhara, JRAS. 1914, pp. 747–8.Google Scholar

^{page 1092 note 5} JAOS. xxxi, 3.Google Scholar

^{page 1092 note 6} See Thomas, , JRAS. 1913, p. 1032Google Scholar; Kavīndravacanasamuccaya, pp. 25–9.Google Scholar

^{page 1092 note 7} I accept for the purpose of this argument the date now generally accepted for the Arthaśāstra on insufficient evidence.

^{page 1092 note 8} JAOS. xxxi, 6, 29.Google Scholar

^{page 1093 note 1} Suali, , p. 27.Google Scholar

^{page 1093 note 2} Tarkasaṁgraha, Introd. p. 21Google Scholar. His theory of two recensions of Kaṇāda is improbable and may be disregarded.

^{page 1093 note 3} p. 416, n. 5, following Jacobi, , Ind. Log. p. 479.Google Scholar

^{page 1093 note 4} ix, 2. 1; cf. iii, 1. 9, where the last differs.

^{page 1093 note 5} See references in Kennedy, , JRAS. 1913, p. 371Google Scholar; Jolly, , Medizin, p. 10Google Scholar; cf. Keith, , ZDMG. lxii, 136.Google Scholar

^{page 1094 note 1} Ind. Log. pp. 482–4.Google Scholar

^{page 1095 note 1} Muséon, 1904, pp. 129–71.Google Scholar

^{page 1096 note 1} Suali, , pp. 423, 424.Google Scholar

^{page 1096 note 2} Suali, , pp. 364–76.Google Scholar

^{page 1097 note 1} Cf. Suali, , pp. 268–70Google Scholar, who gives a valuable discussion of buddhi, not “intelligence”, but “thoughts”.

^{page 1097 note 2} Cf. Vidyābhūṣaṇa's remark, op. cit. p. 96, n. 1.

^{page 1097 note 3} Suali, , pp. 126–35.Google Scholar

^{page 1097 note 4} Suali, , p. 178Google Scholar, n. 2, seems to waver in his view on this point.

^{page 1098 note 1} 1908, pp. 522–6.

^{page 1098 note 2} Encyc. of Religion and Ethics, i, 202.Google Scholar

^{page 1098 note 3} Suali, , pp. 57–62.Google Scholar

^{page 1099 note 1} Suali, , pp. 80–4Google Scholar. Cf. for the dates, Keith, , Bodleian Catalogue, Appendix, pp. 73–4Google Scholar. The date of Jagadīśa's pupil (Suali, , p. 94Google Scholar) given by Aufrecht is not quite correct; see Keith, , p. 74.Google Scholar