Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:47:09.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Socioeconomic Impacts on Agricultural Land use in the Northeast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Douglas E. Morris
Affiliation:
Statistics and Cooperative Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Raleigh, N.C.
Albert E. Luloff
Affiliation:
Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources, University of New Hampshire
Get access

Extract

Joad said, “You're bound to get idears if you go thinkin’ about stuff.”

John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath

Past agricultural programs encouraged the withdrawal of cropland from agricultural production. With the removal of crop acreage restrictions and despite the favorable relationships of the 1972–1974 period, all of this land has not been immediately activated into crop production. Some programs encouraged shifts of cropland to pasture, timber production, or to soil improvement uses. Land converted to these alternatives is potentially available for crop production, but whether or at what rate it will be reemployed remains problematic.

Type
Land Use
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Published with the approval of the Director of the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station as Scientific Contribution Nc. 920.

References

1. Baldwin, Stephen E.Regional and Temporal Dimensions of Metropolitan Area Wage Structures.” Annals of Regional Science, 12(1978): 113.Google Scholar
2. Beale, Calvin L.A Further Look at Nonmetropolitan Growth Since 1970.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976): 954958.Google Scholar
3. Dill, Henry W. Jr. and Otte, Robert C. Urbanization of Land in the Northeastern United States. USDA, ERS-485, August 1971.Google Scholar
4. Frisbie, W. Parker and Posten, Dudley L. Jr.Components of Sustenance Organization and Nonmetropolitan Population Change: A Human Ecological Investigation.” Am. Soc. Rev., 40(1975): 773–84.Google Scholar
5. Frisbie, W. Parker. “The Structure of Sustenance Organization and Population Change in Nonmetropolitan America.” Rur. Soc. 41 (1976): 354–70.Google Scholar
6. Otte, Robert C. Farming in the City's Shadow. Agricultural Economics Report No. 250, ERS, USDA, February 1974.Google Scholar
7. Raup, Philip M.Urban Threats to Rural Lands: Background and Beginnings.” AIP Journal. pp. 371378, November 1975.Google Scholar
8. Rummel, R. J.Understanding Factor Analysis.” J. Conflict Resolution, 11(1967): 444–79.Google Scholar
9. Sullivan, John L.Multiple Indicators: Some Criteria of Selection.” pp. 243249 in Blalock, (ed.), Measurement in the Social Sciences: Theories and Strategies. Chicago: Aldine Press. 1974.Google Scholar
10. U. S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Agriculture: 1974. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1972.Google Scholar
11. U. S. Bureau of the Census. County and City Data Book, 1972. (A Statistical Abstract Supplement). U. S. Government Printing Office, 1973.Google Scholar
12. Wallace, T. Dudley. “Pretest Estimation in Regression: A Survey.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 59(1977): 431443.Google Scholar
13. Zeimetz, Kathryn A., et. al. Dynamics of Land Use in Fast Growth Areas. Agricultural Economics Report No. 325, ERS, USDA, April 1976.Google Scholar