Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:56:43.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential Impact of Industrial Deconcentration and Some Related Questions About Current Antitrust Activity in the Milk Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

H. M. Harris Jr.
H. M. Harris Jr.*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Clemson University
Get access

Extract

Industrial deconcentration or restructuring refers to the break up or diffusion of large firms in markets with high concentration. The idea of carving up large companies into two or more separate entities is not new. A number of prominent economists, including Stigler, Kaysen and Turner, and Mueller, have argued persuasively for just such an action. Since passage of the Sherman Act, the courts, while generally reluctant to perform surgery on large firms, have ordered corporate split-ups in at least 26 cases. Some of the early orders were quite drastic, including the division of Standard Oil of New Jersey into 33 parts, the break up of American Tobacco into 16 pieces, the splitting of DuPont into three separate powder manufacturing firms. With the exception of the Pullman and Paramount cases in the 1940's, both of which are of interest because they involved vertical as well as horizontal dimensions of market power, more recent divestitures have been mild.

Type
Marketing Alternatives for Agriculture – Is There a Better Way?
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , October 1977 , pp. 215 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Boehm, William T. and Conner, M. C. “Technically Efficient Movement Patterns and Manufacturing Plant Locations Under Regionally Coordinated Milk Assembly,” AJAE, Vol. 59, No. 3, August 1977.Google Scholar
2. Cummins, David and Frank, Gary. “Cost of Producing Milk,” Proceedings of Second Southern Dairy Conference, February 1977.Google Scholar
3. Federal Trade Commission, Report of the Commission. FTC Complaint Orders, Stipulations; Beatrice Foods Co., Order to Cease and Desist. Docket 6653, 1965.Google Scholar
4. Forbes, Vol. 119, No. 10, May 1977.Google Scholar
5. Garoyan, Leon and Harris, H. M. Jr. “Industrial Restructuring: A Policy for Industrial Competition,” Marketing Alternatives for Agriculture—Is There a Better Way? Leaflet 7–11, National Public Policy Education Committee Pub. No. 7, Cornell University, 1976.Google Scholar
6. Harris, H. M. Jr., Knutson, R. D. and French, C. E. “An Economic Analysis of Policies Protecting Small Business in the Milk Industry,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, December 1973.Google Scholar
7. Ippolito, Richard A. and Masson, Robert T. The Social Cost of Federal Regulation of Milk, U. S. Department of Justice, (Draft) 1976.Google Scholar
8. Kaysen, Carl and Turner, Donald F. Antitrust Policy: An Economic and Legal Analysis, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
9. Manchester, Alden C. Market Structure, Institutions and Performance in the Fluid Milk Industry, USDA-ERS, Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 248, 1974.Google Scholar
10. Marion, Bruce W. and Sporleder, Thomas L. “An Evaluation of the Economic Basis for Antitrust Policy in the Food Industry,” AJAE, Vol. 58, No. 5, December 1976.Google Scholar
11. Mueller, Willard F. “Industrial Concentration and Market Power: Sources, Consequences, and Social Control,” Economic Issues, Dept. of Agric. Econ., University of Wisconsin, No. 10, June 1977.Google Scholar
12. Mueller, Willard F., Hamm, Larry G. and Cook, Hugh L. Public Policy Toward Mergers in the Dairy Processing Industry, North Central Project 117, Monograph 3, 1976.Google Scholar
13. National Commission on Food Marketing, Organization and Competition in the Dairy Industry. Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office, Tech. Study No. 3, 1966.Google Scholar
14. Parker, Russell C. Economic Report on the Dairy Industry, Staff Report to the FTC, 1973.Google Scholar
15. Scherer, F. M. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago: Rand McNally Co., 1970.Google Scholar
16. Stigler, George J. “The Case Against Big Business,” Fortune, May 1952, Reprinted in Mansfield, ed., Monopoly Power and Economic Performance, New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1964.Google Scholar
17. Tobias, Andrew. “Merging of the ‘Fortune 500’,” New York, December Reprinted in Eastern Review, Vol. 2, No. 5, May 1977.Google Scholar
18. U. S. Department of Agriculture. Comments on the United States Department of Justice Report on Milk Marketing, 1977.Google Scholar
19. U. S. Department of Justice. Report on Milk Marketing, Washington, 1977.Google Scholar
20. Williams, Sheldon W., et al. Organization and Competition in the Midwest Dairy Industries, Ames: Iowa State Press, 1970.Google Scholar