Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:28:03.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Contribution to Our Knowledge of the Life History of Arenicola Marina L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. E. Newell
G. E. Newell
Affiliation:
From the Department of Zoology, Queen Mary College, University of London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The breeding season of the lugworms of the Whitstable area is a sharply defined one, extending for 14 days between the new moon and full moon spring tides in the second half of October. Spawning begins slowly and reaches a maximum at the intervening neap tides and then declines in intensity.

Both eggs and sperms are discharged from the burrows at extreme low water to lie on the surface of the sand. Here fertilization occurs.

No germ cells were detected in the body cavity from November to June, but from August onwards to the end of October 98% of the adult worms are ripe.

At the end of the spawning period about 40% of the adults die.

A brief description of gametogenesis and of the mature gametes is given.

Germ cells are discharged through the nephridia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , November 1948 , pp. 554 - 580
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashworth, J. H., 1904. Arenicola. L.M.B.C. Memoir, No. XI. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Benham, W. B., 1893. Post-larval stage of Arenicola marina. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. III, pp. 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blegvad, H., 1923. Preliminary note on the eggs and larvae of Arenicola marina L. Vidensk. Medd. Dansk. Nat. For. København, Bd. 76, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Bohn, G., 1903. Observations biologiques sur les Arénicoles. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris, Vol. IX, pp. 62–73.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. & Newell, G. E., 1947. The rôle of the body fluid in relation to movement in soft-bodied invertebrates. I. The burrowing of Arenicola. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, Vol. 134, No. 877, pp. 431–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Child, C. M., 1897. A preliminary account of the cleavage of Arenicola cristata, with remarks on the mosaic theory. Zool. Bull., Vol. 1, pp. 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. M. 1898. The maturation and fertilisation of the egg of Arenicola marina. Trans. New York Acad. Sci., Vol. XVI, pp. 387–94.Google Scholar
Child, C. M. 1900. The early development of Arenicola and Sternaspis. Arch. Entwick., Bd. 9, Heft 5, pp. 587–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J. T. & Ramage, G. A., 1888. The Polychaeta Sedentaria of the Firth of Forth. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. XXXIII, pp. 635–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fage, L. & Legendre, R., 1927. Pêches planctoniques à la lumière effectuées à Banyuls-sur-Mer et à Concarneau. I. Annélides polychètes. Arch. Zool. Exp. et Gén., T. 67, pp. 23–222.Google Scholar
Gamble, F. W. & Ashworth, J. H., 1900. The anatomy and classification of the Arenicolidae, with some observations on their post-larval stages. Quart. J. Micr. Sci., Vol. 43, pp. 419–569.Google Scholar
Hentschel, C. C., 1930. On the correlation of the life-history of the acephaline gregarine, Gonospora, with the sexual cycle of its host. II. Gonospora (Kalpidorhyncus) arenicolae. Parasitology, Vol. XXII, pp. 505–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, H. M., 1896. On the nephridia, reproductive organs, and post-larval stages of Arenicola. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Vol. XVIII, pp. 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillie, R. S., 1905. The structure and development of the nephridia of Arenicola cristata Stimpson. Mitt. Zool. Stat. Neapel, Bd. 17, pp. 41–405.Google Scholar
Meek, A. & Storrow, B., 1924. On a pelagic phase of Arenicola marina and of Eteone arctica. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Vol. XIV, pp. 453–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, K., 1941. Gametogenesis, breeding habits and early development of Arenicola cristata Stimpson, a tubicolous Polychaete. Sci. Rep. Tôhoku Imperial Univ., 4th ser. Biol., Vol. XVI, No. 2.Google Scholar
Pirlot, J. M., 1933. La ponte de l'Arenicola marina Linné à la côte Belge. Bull. Mus. Roy. Hist. Nat. Belg., T. IX, No. 49, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Storrow, B., 1925. Faunistic notes. Rep. Dove Marine Lab. Cullercoats for 1925, Vol. 14, p. 57.Google Scholar
Thamdrup, H. M., 1935. Beiträge zur Ökologie der Wattenfauna auf experimenteller Grundlage. Medd. Komm. Danmarks Fisk. Havund., Kobenhavn, Ser. Fisk., Bd. X, No. 2, 125 pp.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the Sound . Medd. Komm. Danmarks Fisk. Havund., København, Ser. Plankton, Bd. 4, No. 1, 523 pp.Google Scholar
Wells, G. P., 1945. The mode of life of Arenicola marina L. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVI, pp. 170–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, H. C., 1916. The spawning and exuviation of Arenicola. Journ. Zool. Res., London, Vol. 1, pp. 102–11.Google Scholar