Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:56:42.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Educational Phonetics in JIPA?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Bryan Jenner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From Winter 1987 JIPA will incorporate, in the second edition of each year, a section devoted to Educational Phonetics. Contributions, in the form of articles, notes, statements of problems, and correspondence, are therefore invited from colleagues whose professional activity lies within this broad area: that is to say, language teachers, speech therapists, clinical audiologists, language pathologists and teachers of acting and singing.

Type
Educational Phonetics
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , July 1987 , pp. 35 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1961). Parameters and phonemes. In Jones, W.E. and Laver, J. (editors), Phonetics in Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brazil, D. (1985). The Communicative Value of Intonation in English, Discourse Analysis Monographs No. 8. ELR: Birmingham.Google Scholar
Brown, G., Currie, K. and Kenworthy, J. (1980). Questions of Intonation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1964). Phonation types. In Abercrombie, D., et al. (editors), In Honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Honikman, B. (1964). Articulatory settings. In Abercrombie, D., et al. (editors), In Honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman.Google Scholar
James, A. (1976). Dialektale Transfer in der Prosodie. Linguistik und Didaktik 28, 261–272.Google Scholar
Jenner, B. R. A. (1976). Interlanguage and foreign accent. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, Utrecht 1/2–3, 166–195..Google Scholar
Jenner, B. R. A. (1984). Dutch-English: The Phonological and Prosodie Systems of a Non-native Variety of English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Knowles, G. O. (1974). Scouse: the Urban Dialect of Liverpool. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Knowles, G. O. (1978). The nature of phonological variables in Scouse. In Trudgill, P. (editor), Sociolinguistics Patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1980). What are linguistic sounds made of? Language 56:5, 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, J. (1972). Voice quality and indexical information. In Laver, J. and Hutcheson, S. (editors), Communication in Face-to-Face Interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. D. and Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. (1978). Prosody errors in English spoken by Danes. Nordic Prosody Symposium, Institute of Linguistics, Lund, 271–277.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English, (3 vols.). Volume 1: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar