Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:03:59.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living Standards and the Distribution of Income in Colonial Indonesia: A Review of the Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Anne Booth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most widely held views about Indonesia, and especially Java, in the nineteenth century was that such economic growth as occurred did not benefit the mass of the indigenous population, whose living standards almost certainly declined. Many scholars have drawn attention to the evidence that per capita rice production fell after 1880 as proof that living standards were definitely falling in the last two decades of the century, while others have not hesitated to draw the bolder conclusion that living standards declined almost continually after 1800:

One theme stands out most prominently in Javanese society during this time: the theme of involution and reaction…. Despite the promises of the changing colonial policies to further the individual welfare of the Javanese, conspicuously little was done in this regard. Instead the Javanese farmer became gradually more impoverished throughout the whole of the nineteenth century, with a particularly severe drop in living standards in the second half of the liberal period (1885–1900).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , September 1988 , pp. 310 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Carey, P.B.R., “Aspects of Javanese History in the 19th Century”, in The Development of Indonesian Society, ed. Aveling, Harry (St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1979), p. 10Google Scholar.

2 As cited by van der Heide, J. Homan in ChrPenders, L.M., Indonesia: Selected Documents on Colonialism and Nationalism 1830–1942 (St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1977), p. 60Google Scholar.

3 van Doom, J., The Engineers and the Colonial System: Technocratic Tendencies in the Dutch East Indies, Comparative Asian Studies Programme, Monograph 6 (Rotterdam: Erasmus University, 1982), p. 2Google Scholar.

4 For further discussion see Van Doom, op. cit., and also Boomgaard, P., “The Welfare Services in Indonesia, 1900–42”, Itinerario X (1) (1986): 57–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Boeke, J., “Objective and Personal Elements in Colonial Welfare Policy”, in Indonesia: The Concept of Dualism in Theory and Policy (The Hague: Van Hoeve, 1966)Google Scholar.

6 See in particular Breman, Jan, The Village on Java and the Early Colonial State, Comparative Asian Studies Programme, Monograph 1 (Rotterdam: Erasmus University, 1980)Google Scholar and Kumar, Ann, “The Peasantry and the State on Java: Changes of Relationship, Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries”, in Indonesia: The Making of a Nation, ed. Mackie, J.A.C. (Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, 1980)Google Scholar. A further contribution to the debate, which takes issue with Breman's argument is given by Elson, R., “Aspects of Peasant Life in Early Nineteenth Java”, in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Indonesia: Essays in Honour of Professor J.D. Legge, ed. Chandler, David P. and Ricklefs, M.C. (Monash University: Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, 1986)Google Scholar.

7 Carey, Peter, “The Origins of the Java War (1825–30)”, English Historical Review 91: 52–78Google Scholar.

8 van Ark, Bart, Indonesian Export Growth and Economic Development: 117 Years of Empirical Evidence, 1823 to 1940, Research Memorandum 189, Faculty of Economics, University of Groningen, 05 1986Google Scholar.

9 Boomgaard, Peter, “Java's Agricultural Production: 1775–1875”, Paper presented to the conference on Economic Growth and Social Change in Indonesia, 1820–1940,Groningen,State University,1984,Google Scholar Table 2, and “Children of the Colonial State: Population Growth and Economic Development in Java, 1795–1880” (Ph.D. dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam, 1987)Google Scholar, Table 6.4. See also Elson, R.E., “Peasant Poverty and Prosperity under the Cultivation System in Java”, Paper presented to the conference on Indonesian Economic History in the Dutch Colonial Era,Canberra,ANU,1983.Google Scholar This paper is forthcoming in Indonesian Economic History in the Dutch Colonial Era, ed. Booth, Anne, O'Malley, W.J. and Weidemann, Anna (Yale University Southeast Asia Studies Monograph)Google Scholar.

10 Fernando, Radin, Famine in Java 1844–50: A New Perspective on the Cultivation System, Centre of Southeast Asian Studies Working Paper No. 41 (Melbourne: Monash University, 1980)Google Scholar and Elson, R.E., “The Famine in Demak and Grobogan in 1849–50: Its Causes and Circumstances”, Review of Indonesian and Malay Affairs 19 (1): 39–85Google Scholar.

11 Sen, Amartya, Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

12 Elson, op. cit., “The Famine in Demak”, p. 10. Much the same argument is made by Hugenholtz, who claims that “the Semarang famine was thus not so much a deficiency famine as in essence a price famine. It was not the result of a shortage of food but of total absence of money.” See Hugenholtz, W.R., “Famine and Food Supply in Java, 1830–1914”, in Two Colonial Empires: Comparative Essays on the History of India and Indonesia in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Bayley, C.A. and Kolff, D.H.A. (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), p. 165Google Scholar.

13 Fasseur, Cees, “Some Remarks on the Cultivation System in Java”, Acta Historiae Nederlandicae 10 (1978): 160Google Scholar. See also the same author's essay “The Cultivation System and its Impact on the Dutch Colonial Economy and the Indigenous Society in Nineteenth Century Java”, in ed. C.A. Bayley and D.H.A. Kolff, op. cit., pp. 143ff.

14 This argument was made by Reinsma in his 1955 thesis, and quoted approvingly by Fasseur in the 1986 paper referred to above.

15 For details of the Sauerbeck price index see Sauerbeck, A., “Prices of Commodities and the Precious Metals”, Journal of the Statistical Society XLIX (1986): 581–648Google Scholar.

16 Boomgaard, op. cit., “Children of the Conolial State”, pp. 179–80.

17 Boomgaard, op. cit., “Java's Agricultural Production”, Table 2 and p. 28.

18 Scheltema, A.M.P.A., The Food Consumption of the Native Inhabitants of Java and Madura (Batavia: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1936), p. 12Google Scholar. The implicit annual average population growth rate for the years 1850 to 1865 in Scheltema's figures is 2.7 per cent which is far higher than most modern scholars allow. Boomgaard, op. cit., “Children of the Colonial State”, p. 293, suggests that population was growing at about 1.6 per cent per annum after 1850.

19 See in particular White, Ben, “Demand for Labour and Population Growth in Colonial Java”, Human Ecology 1 (3): 217–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Boomgaard, Peter, “Morbidity and Mortality in Java, 1820–1880: Changing Patterns of Disease and Death”, in Death and Disease in Southeast Asia, ed. Owen, Norman G. (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar and “Children of the Colonial State”, pp. 280–81. In the latter work, Boomgaard argues that there might also have been some increase in fertility due to changes in the age of marriage.

21 Carey, op. cit., 1979, pp. 83–86. See also van Niel, R., “The Effect of Export Cultivations in 19th Century Java”, Modern Asian Studies XV (1981): 43Google Scholar. For a more extended discussion of the impact of export growth on the domestic economy in the last century of the colonial period see Booth, Anne, “Foreign Trade and Domestic Development in the Colonial Economy”, Paper presented to the conference on Indonesian Economic History in the Dutch Colonial Era,Canberra,ANU,1983Google Scholar; forthcoming in Booth O'Malley and Weidemann (editors), op. cit. Detailed information on the Indonesian balance of payments from 1820 onwards is given in Altes, W. Korthals, Changing Economy in Indonesia, Vol. 7, Table 1Google Scholar.

22 Furnivall, J., Netherlands India (Cambridge University Press, 1944), p. 215Google Scholar and A.M.P.A. Scheltema, op. cit., p. 12.

23 Homan van der Heide, as cited in Penders, op. cit., pp. 56–58; Van Deventer, as cited in Furnivall, op. cit., p. 214; P. Creutzberg, , Het Ekonomisch Beleid in Nederlandsch-Indie, Eerste Stuk (Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff NV, 1972), pp. xxxi, 734–35Google Scholar.

24 Furnivall, op. cit., p. 214.

25 Hasselman, C.J., Algemeen Overzicht van de Uitkomsten van het Welvaart Onderzoek gehouden op Java an Madoera in 1904–5 (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1914)Google Scholar as cited in Penders, op. cit., p. 90.

26 See e.g. Carey, op. cit., 1979, p. 95.

27 Hasselman, op. cit., Appendix R.

28 This point is dealt with in my forthcoming monograph, Agricultural Development in Indonesia, Table 3.10. In a residency such as Surabaya, where 66 per cent of all operators were cultivating land under rotating communal shares, and usually operating quite small holdings, the effect of including their holdings with those under individual titles was to reduce the Gini coefficient of holdings from 0.537 to 0.411.

29 Elson, R.E., Javanese Peasants and the Colonial Sugar Industry (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 176–77Google Scholar.

30 These data are taken from the tabulations in the Koloniaal Verslag, 1907, Appendix AGoogle Scholar.

31 Furnivall, op. cit., p. 213.

32 There is no general cost-of-living index for this period, but the rice index reported in Changing Economy of Indonesia, Vol. 4, Table 1 (1913 = 100) rose from 72.7 to 86.1 between 1905 and 1910.

33 Polak, J.J., The National Income of the Netherlands Indies, 1921–39 (New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1943)Google Scholar, as reprinted in Changing Economy of Indonesia, Vol. 5, Table 16.4.

34 Kahin, George M., Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1952), p. 25Google Scholar.

35 Scheltema, op. cit., p. 12.

36 van de Koppel, C., “Eenige Statistische Gegevens”, in De Landbouw in den Indischen Archipel, Vol. 1, ed. van Hall, C.J.J. and van de Koppel, C. (The Hague: Van Hoeve, 1946), p. 369Google Scholar.

37 Huender, op. cit., as cited in Penders, op. cit., p. 93.

38 See Booth, Anne, “The Burden of Taxation in Colonial Indonesia in the Twentieth Century”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. XI (1), 03 1980, Table 6Google Scholar.

39 Wertheim, W.F., Indonesian Society in Transition (The Hague: Van Hoeve, 1956), p. 87Google Scholar.

40 Ranneft, J.W. Meijer and Huender, W., Belastingdruk op de Inlandsche Bevolking (Weltevreden: Landsdrukkerij, 1926)Google Scholar.

41 Kahin, op. cit., pp. 29–30.

42 Gotzen, L., “Volksinkomen en Belasting”, Koloniale Studien 17 (1933): 473Google Scholar.

43 Anne Booth, op. cit., 1980, Figure 1.

44 The data assembled by Polak (op. cit., Table 16.4) show that the real income accruing to indigenous Indonesians in Java grew by about seven per cent between 1929 and 1935, while over the same years population grew by 9.3 per cent.

45 In his study of the impact of the depression on the indigenous economy, van Laanen argues that “the gap between rich and poor, between purchasing agents/money lenders and debtors became irrefutably wider. There is no doubt that in many areas in the archipelago the income distribution became more uneven.” To support this argument, Van Laanen points out that the falling price level meant that those who kept their employment usually experienced an increase in real incomes. See van Laanen, J.T.M., The World Depression (1929–35) and the Indigenous Economy in Netherlands India, Occasional Paper 13 (Townsville: James Cook University, Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, 1982), p. 13Google Scholar.

46 van Oorschot, H.J., De Ontwikkeling van de Nijverheid in Indonesia (The Hague: Van Hoeve 1956) p. 102Google Scholar.

47 Wertheim, op. cit., p. 95.

48 “The Living Conditions of Municipally Employed Coolies in Batavia in 1937”, in The Indonesian Town: Studies in Urban Sociology (The Hague: Van Hoeve, 1958)Google Scholar; van Niel, R. (translator), Living Conditions of Plantation Workers and Peasants on Java in 1939–40 (Ithaca: Cornell University Modern Indonesia Project Translation Series, 1956)Google Scholar.

49 J.J. Polak, op. cit., p. 75.

50 Kahin, op. cit., p. 29.

51 Sitsen, Peter H.W., Industrial Development of the Netherlands Indies, Bulletin 2 (Batavia: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1943), p. 58Google Scholar.

52 Kahin, op. cit., p. 36.

53 For a more detailed discussion of the distribution of income in late colonial India and Indonesia, see Booth, Anne, “The Colonial Legacy and its Impact on Post-Independence Planning in India and Indonesia”, Itinerario, Vol. X (1), p. 9Google Scholar.