Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:48:53.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Social Policy Analysis and Active Labour Market Policy: Putting Quality before Quantity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2015

JOCHEN CLASEN ,
DANIEL CLEGG  and
ALEXANDER GOERNE
JOCHEN CLASEN
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 15A George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LD email: [email protected]
DANIEL CLEGG
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 15A George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LD
ALEXANDER GOERNE
Affiliation:
German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the past decade, active labour market policy (ALMP) has become a major topic in comparative social policy analysis, with scholars exploiting cross-national variation to seek to identify the determinants of policy development in this central area of the ‘new welfare state’. In this paper, we argue that better integration of this policy field into social policy scholarship requires rather more critical engagement with considerable methodological, conceptual and theoretical challenges in order to analyse these policies comparatively. Most fundamentally, rather more reflection is needed on what the substantially relevant dimensions of variation in ALMP from a social policy perspective actually are, as well as enhanced efforts to ensure that it is those that are being analysed and compared.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 21 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, A., Johansson, H., Koch, M. and Panican, A. (2013), National Report: Sweden, Research report for the project Combating Poverty in Europe (COPE), http://cope-research.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/COPE_WP4_National_Report_Sweden.pdf.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K. (2007), ‘Active labour market policy, international organizations and domestic politics’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14: 6, 905–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, J.-C. (2001), Welfare to Work Policies in Europe: The Current Challenge of Activation Policies, Paris: Centre d’Etudes de l’Emploi.Google Scholar
Berry, C. (2014), ‘Quantity over quality: a political economy of “active labour market policy” in the UK’, Policy Studies, 35: 6, 592–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. (1998), Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2006), The Political Economy of Activation, IDHEAP Working Paper 2008–1, Lausanne: IDHEAP.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2010), ‘The political economy of active labour market policy’, Politics and Society, 38: 4, 435–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2011), ‘Active labour market policies in a changing economic context’, in Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (eds.), Regulating the Risk of Unemployment: National Adaptations to Post-industrial Labour Markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 318–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2012), ‘Blame avoidance and credit claiming revisited’, in Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (eds.), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2013), The Origins of Active Social Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (eds.) (2012), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredgaard, T. and Jørgensen, H. (2000), ‘Was the problem solved? Danish youth unemployment policies in the 1990s’, CARMA Working Paper, Aalborg, CARMA.Google Scholar
Breunig, C. and Busemeyer, M. (2012), ‘Fiscal austerity and the trade-off between public investment and social spending’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19: 6, 921–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. (1978), ‘The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis’, American Political Science Review, 72: 4, 1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, D., Kluve, J. and Weber, A. (2010), ‘Active labour market policy evaluations: a meta-analysis’, The Economic Journal, 120: 548, 452–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasen, J. (2005), Reforming European Welfare States: Germany and the United Kingdom Compared, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2006), ‘Beyond activation: reforming European unemployment protection systems in post-industrial labour markets’, European Societies, 8: 4, 555–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2007), ‘Levels and levers of conditionality – measuring change in mature welfare states’, in Clasen, J. and Siegel, N. A. (eds.), Investigating Welfare State Change: The Dependent Variable Problem in Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 166–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasen, J. and Goerne, A. (2011), ‘Exit Bismarck, enter dualism? Assessing contemporary German labour market policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 40: 4, 795–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daguerre, A. (2007), Active Labour Market Policies and Welfare Reform: Europe and the US in Comparative Perspective, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danforth, B. and Stephens, J. (2013), ‘Measuring social citizenship: achievements and future challenges’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20: 9, 1285–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Deken, J. and Clasen, J. (2013), ‘Benefit dependency: the pros and cons of using “caseload” data for national and international comparisons’, International Social Security Review, 66: 2, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlinghagen, M. and Knuth, M. (2010), ‘Unemployment as an institutional construct? Structural differences in non-employment between selected European countries and the United States’, Journal of Social Policy, 39: 1, 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1989), ‘The three political economies of the welfare state’, Canadian Review of Sociology, 26: 1, 10–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat (2011), Labour Market Policy: Qualitative Report UK, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2012), Labour Market Policy – Expenditure and Participants: Data 2010, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2013), Labour Market Policy Statistics: Methodology, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2014), Labour Market Policy: Qualitative Reports, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2005), The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, D. (2012), Subcontracting in Public Employment Services: The Design and Delivery of ‘Outcome Based’ and ‘Black Box’ Contracts, Analytical Paper for the Mutual Learning Programme for Public Employment Services, Brussels: The European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.Google Scholar
Gaston, N. and Rajaguru, G. (2008), ‘The rise (and fall) of labour market programmes: domestic vs. global factors’, Oxford Economic Papers, 60: 4, 619–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goerne, A. and Clegg, D. (2013), National Report: UK, Research Report for the Project Combating Poverty in Europe (COPE), http://cope-research.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/National_Report_UK.pdf.Google Scholar
Huo, J. (2009), Third Way Reforms: Social Democracy after the Golden Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huo, J., Nelson, M. and Stephens, J. (2008), ‘Decommodification and activation in social democratic policy: resolving the paradox’, Journal of European Social Policy, 18: 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
Janoski, T. (1990), The Political Economy of Unemployment: Active Labor Market Policy in West Germany and the United States, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, C. (2011), ‘Less bad than its reputation: social spending as a proxy for welfare effort in cross-national studies’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13: 3, 327–40.Google Scholar
Kaps, P. (2012), ‘Die Rolle der Kommunen in der Arbeitsmarkt- und Beschäftigungspolitik’, in Bothfeld, S., Sesselmeier, W., Bogedan, C. (eds.), Arbeitsmarktpolitik in der sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Vom Arbeitsförderungsgesetz zum Sozialgesetzbuch II und III, 2nd edn, Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Lødemel, I. and Moreira, A. (2014), Activation or Workfare: Governance and the Neo-Liberal Convergence, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lødemel, I. and Trickey, H. (2001), An Offer You Can't Refuse, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (2014), ‘Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: stylized facts and evidence on their effectiveness’, IZA Policy Paper, no. 84.Google Scholar
Moon, J. and Richardson, J. (1984), ‘The unemployment industry’, Policy and Politics, 12: 4, 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, M. (2013), ‘Making markets with active labour market policies: the influence of political parties, welfare state regimes and economic change on different types of policies’, European Political Science Review, 5: 2, 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldervoll, J. (2014), ‘Active labour market policies – measuring a central building block in post-industrial employment policy’, paper presented at ESPAnet conference, Oslo, 4–6 September.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. and Henning, R. (1984), ‘Public responses to unemployment: symbolic or placebo policies’, in Richardson, J. and Henning, R. (eds.), Unemployment: Policy Responses of Western Democracies, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 308–22.Google Scholar
Rueda, D. (2005), ‘Insider–outsider politics in industrialized democracies: the challenge to social democratic parties’, American Political Science Review, 99: 1, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, D. (2006), ‘Social democracy and active labour-market policies: insiders, outsiders and the politics of employment promotion’, British Journal of Political Science, 36: 3, 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, G., Reissert, B. and Bruche, G. (1992), Unemployment Insurance and Active Labor Market Policy: An International Comparison of Financing Systems, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. (1983), ‘The welfare state and economy in periods of economic crisis: a comparative study of 23 OECD-nations’, European Journal of Political Research, 11: 1, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengenberger, W. (2011), ‘Beyond the measurement of unemployment and underemployment’, ILO Working Paper, Geneva, International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Sol, E. and Westerveld, M. (2005), Contractualism in Employment Services: A New Form of Welfare State Governance, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. (1979), The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, D. (2011), ‘Activating workers? The political economy of active social policy in postindustrial democracies’, Research in the Sociology of Work, 22: 9–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepe, M. and Vanhuysse, P. (2013), ‘Parties, unions, and activation strategies: the context-dependent politics of active labor market policy spending’, Political Studies, 61: 3, 480–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therborn, G. (1986), Why Some People are More Unemployed than Others, London: Verso.Google Scholar
van Berkel, R., de Graaf, W. and Sirovátka, T. (2011), The Governance of Active Welfare States in Europe, Work and Welfare in Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oorschot, W. and Abrahamson, P. (2003), ‘The Dutch and Danish miracles revisited: a critical discussion of activation policies in two small welfare states’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 3, 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vliet, O. and Koster, F. (2011), ‘Europeanization and the political economy of active labour market policies’, European Union Politics, 12: 2, 217–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vis, B. (2007), ‘States of welfare or states of workfare? Welfare state restructuring in 16 capitalist democracies, 1985–2002’, Policy and Politics, 35: 1, 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vis, B. (2011), ‘Under which conditions does spending on active labor market policies increase? An fsQCA analysis of 53 governments between 1985 and 2003’, European Political Science Review, 3: 2, 229–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlandas, T. (2013), ‘Mixing apples with oranges? Partisanship and active labour market policies in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23: 1, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, M. and Skocpol, T. (1985), ‘State structures and the possibilities for Keynesian responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain and the United States’, in Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D. and Skocpol, T. (eds.), Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weishaupt, J. T. (2011), From the Manpower Revolution to the Activation Paradigm, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. (1975), The Welfare State and Equality, Berkeley, CA: Berkeley University Press.Google Scholar