Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:49:32.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collectivism, Regionalism and Feminism: Health Visiting and British Social Policy 1850–1975*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Robert W. J. Dingwall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper takes up three particular themes in the historical development of the present pattern of social service provision in the United Kingdom and argues that existing accounts are somewhat misleading in their treatment of these issues. The three themes are the relationship between collectivism and individualism in social policy legislation and practice, the influence of centre and periphery in British political life and, to a lesser extent, the occupational roles available to women in the social services. These questions are examined through a study of the history of health visiting. It is argued that the fluctuating fortunes of the health visiting service allow us to see more clearly the changing influence of collectivist and individualist philosophies on government policy and the degrees to which definitions of problems and possible solutions have either been imported from the national periphery to the national centre or vice versa. Insufficient attention has been given to the defeat of metropolitan individualist philosophies by the peripherally-based public health movement at the beginning of the twentieth century and to the conditions which have led to their subsequent re-emergence and the waning influence of collectivist approaches.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , July 1977 , pp. 291 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For example, Fraser, Derek, The Evolution of the British Welfare State, Macmillan, London, 1973, pp. 121–3Google Scholar; Mowat, C. L., The Charity Organisation Society, Methuen, London, 1961Google Scholar, and Woodroofe, Kathleen, From Charity to Social Work, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1962.Google Scholar

2 Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration, vol. I, Cd 2175, HMSO, London, 1904, p. 90Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Report).

3 Longmate, Norman, King Cholera, Hamish Hamilton, London, 1966.Google Scholar

4 Langton, B. M., ‘Early Health Visiting’, Nursing Times, 1963, vol. 59, pp. 1247–8.Google ScholarPubMed

5 Report, I, p. 58.Google Scholar

6 This scheme is often given great importance by official historians of health visiting, because of Florence Nightingale's involvement through her nephew Sir Frederick Verney, Chairman of the County Technical Education Committee (Margaret McEwan, Health Visiting, Faber and Faber, London, 1957, pp. 20–1).Google Scholar After the first training course, it dis appears without trace ( Hale, Rosemary et al. , The Principles and Practices of Health Visiting, Pergamon, London, 1968, p. 9Google Scholar) and is not mentioned to the Inter-Departmental Committee. The emphasis on this scheme in official versions probably has more to do with an attempt to fabricate an authentic line of descent from nursing to health visiting than with any practical effect on national policy.

7 Report, vol. II, Cd 2210, HMSO, London, Qs. 8089–418.

8 Quoted in SirNewman, George, Infant Mortality: A Social Problem, Methuen, London, 1906, pp. 263–4.Google Scholar

9 Quoted in Kincaid, J. C., Poverty and Equality in Britain, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1973, p. 239.Google Scholar

10 Gilbert, Bentley B., The Evolution of National Insurance in Great Britain: The Origins of the Welfare State, Michael Joseph, London, 1966.Google Scholar

11 Report, II, Q. 2439.

12 Ibid., Qs. 10299–304.

13 Ibid., Qs. 12259–64.

14 Ibid., Qs. 2912–7.

15 Ibid., Q. 1589.

16 Ibid., Qs. 1836–8.

17 Ibid., Q. 3336.

18 Ibid., Q. 11790.

19 Ibid., Q. 2396.

20 Ibid., Q. 3371.

21 Report, I, p. 59.Google Scholar

22 Gilbert, op. cit, p. 146.

23 Ibid., passim.

24 McCleary, G. F., Early History of the Infant Welfare Movement, H. K. Lewis, London, 1933, p. 89.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., pp. 151–68.

26 Ibid., pp. 87–8; Simon, Shena D., A Century of City Government: Manchester 1838–1938, Allen and Unwin, London, 1938, p. 210.Google Scholar

27 (Hay, Matthew), Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Aberdeen 1916–1021, Aberdeen, 1921.Google Scholar

28 Quoted by McCleary, op. cit., pp. 140–4.

29 McCleary, G. F., The Maternity and Child Welfare Movement, P. S. King, London, 1935, p. 32Google Scholar; McEwan, op. cit., p. 24.

30 McQueen, I. A. G., ‘From Carbolic Powder to Social Counsel: Centenary Address to Battersea College of Technology’, Nursing Times, 1962, vol. 58, pp. 866–8Google Scholar; Hale et al, op. cit., p. 12.

31 Hutt, C. W., Hygiene for Health Visitors, School Nurses and Social Workers, Methuen, London, 1921, p. 372.Google Scholar

32 McEwan, op. cit., p. 24.

33 Hutt, op. cit., pp. 310–11.

34 Kincaid, op. cit, pp. 239–40.

35 McQueen, op. cit.

36 McCleary, 1935, op. cit., p. 35.

37 (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Population Investigation Committee) Maternity in Great Britain: A Survey of Social and Economic Aspects of Pregnancy and Childbirth, Oxford University Press, London, 1948, pp. 101–3.Google Scholar

38 McCleary, 1935, op. cit, p. 36.

39 (Jameson, Report) An Inquiry into Health Visiting: Report of a Working Party of the Field of Work, Training and Recruitment of Health Visitors, HMSO, London, 1956, p. 147.Google Scholar

40 Ferguson, S. M. and Fitzgerald, H., History of the Second World War: Studies in the Social Services, HMSO, London, 1954, p. 145.Google Scholar

41 Titmuss, Richard M., Essays on the ‘Welfare State’, Allen and Unwin, London, 1958, pp. 75–87.Google Scholar

42 Calder, Angus, The People's War, Panther, London, 1971, pp. 40–5Google Scholar; Isaacs, Susan, The Cambridge Evacuation Survey, Methuen, London, 1941.Google Scholar

43 Report of the Care of Children Committee, Cmd 6922, HMSO, London, 1946.Google Scholar

44 Ferguson and Fitzgerald, op. cit., p. 145n.

45 Jameson Report, op. cit., p. 8.

46 Children and Young Persons, Scotland, Crand 2306, HMSO, Edinburgh, 1964Google Scholar; Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services, Cmnd 3703, HMSO, London, 1968.Google Scholar

47 (Child Poverty Action Group) Poverty and the labour Government, CPAG, London, 1970Google Scholar; Townsend, P. et al. , Social Services for All?, Fabian Society, London, 1968.Google Scholar

48 Lambert, R., Sir John Simon 1816–1904, MacGibbon and Kee, London, 1963.Google Scholar

49 Millett, K., Sexual Politics, Abacus, London, 1972.Google Scholar