Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:40:57.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade, institutions, and the ancient economy - T. T. Terpstra 2019. Trade in the Ancient Mediterranean: Private Order and Public Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pp. x + 274, 6 maps, 9 black-and-white figs. ISBN 978-0-691-17208-8.

Review products

T. T. Terpstra 2019. Trade in the Ancient Mediterranean: Private Order and Public Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pp. x + 274, 6 maps, 9 black-and-white figs. ISBN 978-0-691-17208-8.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Peter Candy
Peter Candy*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of Roman Archaeology , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , June 2022 , pp. 450 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernard, S. 2020. “Integration, institutions, and the economy of Republican Italy.” Review of Italy's Economic Revolution: Integration and Economy in Republican Italy, by S. T. Roselaar. JRA 33: 563–67.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1995a. “Introduction.” In The Quantity Theory of Money: From Locke to Keynes and Friedman, ed. Blaug, M., Eltis, W., O'Brien, D., Patinkin, D., Skidelsky, R., and Wood, G. E., 1–3. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1995b. “Why is the quantity theory of money the oldest surviving theory in economics?” In The Quantity Theory of Money: From Locke to Keynes and Friedman, ed. Blaug, M., Eltis, W., O'Brien, D., Patinkin, D., Skidelsky, R., and Wood, G. E., 27–49. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bowes, K. 2021. “When Kuznets went to Rome: Roman economic well-being and the reframing of Roman history.” Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics 2: 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1946. The Idea of History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
de Cecco, M. 1985. “Monetary theory and Roman history.” The Journal of Economic History 45, no. 4: 809–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, I. 1911. The Purchasing Power of Money: Its Determination and Relation to Credit, Interest, and Crises. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. 1956. “Ligninger vs. identiteter i økonomisk makroteori.” In 25 Economic Essays in Honour of Erik Lindahl, 68–78. Stockholm: Ekonomisk Tidskrift.Google Scholar
Handa, J. 2014. Monetary Economics. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1967. Critical Essays in Monetary Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1989. A Market Theory of Money. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, D. B. 2007. Money in the Late Roman Republic. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horden, P., and Purcell, N.. 2000. The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean History. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Howgego, C. J. 1995. Ancient History from Coins. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, P. 2014. Rome's Economic Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Transl. K. Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. K., and Mizen, P. D.. 2000. Monetary Economics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moss, L. S., and Ryan, C. K., eds. 1993. Economic Thought in Spain: Selected Essays of Marjorie Grice-Hutchinson. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Nicholas, J. K. B. M. 2008. An Introduction to Roman Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., and Weingast, B. R.. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, R. 1988. “The new institutional economics applied to monetary economics.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 144, no. 1: 208–24.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2009. “In search of Roman economic growth.” JRA 22: 46–70.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2011. “A comparative perspective on the determinants of scale and productivity of Roman maritime trade in the Mediterranean.” In Maritime Technology in the Ancient Economy: Ship-Design and Navigation, ed. Harris, W. V. and Iara, K., 21–38. Portsmouth, RI: JRA.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W., ed. 2012. The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 2006 [1954]. History of Economic Analysis. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchernia, A. 2016. The Romans and Trade. Transl. Grieve, J. and Minchin, E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verboven, K. 2015. “The knights who say NIE. Can neo-institutional economics live up to its expectation in ancient history research?” In Structure and Performance in the Roman Economy: Models, Methods and Case Studies, ed. Erdkamp, P. and Verboven, K., 33–58. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
von Reden, S. 2002. “Money in the ancient economy: A survey of recent research.” Klio 84, no. 1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 2013 [1908]. The Agrarian Sociology of Ancient Civilizations. Transl. Frank, R. I.. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, B. V., and Yarbrough, R. M.. 1997. “Dispute settlement in international trade: Regionalism and procedural coordination.” In The Political Economy of Regionalism, ed. Mansfield, E. D. and Milner, H. V., 134–63. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar