Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:01:16.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The scholarly radiation therapist. Part two: developing an academic practice—the Princess Margaret Hospital experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Amanda Bolderston
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario,Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Nicole Harnett
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario,Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Cathryne Palmer
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario,Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Julie Wenz
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario,Canada
Pamela Catton
Affiliation:
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario,Canada Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Part two of this two-part series presents the results of a departmental initiative implemented in 2003 at a large urban cancer centre, Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. This new model for radiation therapists was called Advanced Integrated Practice (AIP) and was developed, in part, to encourage and promote scholarship within radiation therapy. The AIP model incorporated integrated clinical specialty roles designed to blend exemplary clinical practice with focused academic activities. This paper discusses an evaluation of the AIP model undertaken to obtain a formal measure of how the model had evolved, how the radiation therapists and other stakeholders were responding to the new model, whether the initial outcomes were realized and to create plans for further development of the design. The evaluation utilized a mixture of traditional qualitative research methodologies such as focus groups, quantitative surveys and a variety of other available measurable outcomes. Outcomes from the model included increased opportunities for diverse roles that incorporated an element of academic practice and augmented career choice and scope for radiation therapists. In addition, academic output and research work also increased within the department. Lessons learned from the implementation and evaluation of the model are shared, and the authors offer some suggestions to increase scholarly activity within the profession.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jones, EG, Van Ort, S.Facilitating scholarship among clinical faculty. J Prof Nurs 2001; 17(3):141146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raff, BS, Arnold, J.Faculty development: an approach to scholarship. Nurse Educ 2001;26(4):159161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crookes, PA, Bradshaw, PL.Developing scholarship in nursing—steps within a strategy. J Nurs Manag 2002;10:177181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diers, D.Clinical scholarship. J Prof Nurs 1995; 11:2430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elberson, KL, Williams, SA.Innovative strategies for promoting clinical scholarship: a holistic approach. Holist Nurs Pract 1996; 10(3):3340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meisenhelder, JB.Cultivating scholarship in the clinical setting. J Nurs Staff Dev 1994;10(2):8790.Google ScholarPubMed
Kane, G.A beam’s eye view: examining the impact of change on a medical practice. [EdD thesis]. Toronto (ON): Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto 2005.Google Scholar
Radiation Medicine Program Strategic Plan, 2003.Google Scholar
Boyer, EL.Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ, 1990.Google Scholar
Riley, JM, Beal, J, Levi, P, McCausland, MP.Revisioning nursing scholarship. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002; 34(4):383390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed