Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T04:10:37.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conodonts and the Devonian–Carboniferous boundary in the upper Woodford Shale, Arbuckle Mountains, south-central Oklahoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

D. Jeffrey Over
D. Jeffrey Over*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, SUNY Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454–1401
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Woodford Shale of south-central Oklahoma was deposited in an offshore, quiet-water, oxygen-poor setting on the southern margin of North America in assocation with other dark organic-rich shales of the Upper Devonian–Lower Carboniferous black-shale facies. The basal Woodford was deposited unconformably over lower Paleozoic carbonate strata as a south-to-north transgressive unit during the Frasnian and early Famennian. Black shales and cherts lie directly above the basal beds.

Phosphatic shales in the upper Woodford contain a conodont succession characterized by three distinct environmentally controlled faunas. The lower fauna is characterized by Palmatolepis gracilis ssp., Branmehla inornata, Bispathodus stabilis, and Pseudopolygnathus marburgensis trigonicus, indicative of the Late Devonian Lower expansa Zone to Upper praesulcata Zone. The middle fauna, which spans the Devonian–Carboniferous (D/C) boundary, is characterized by Polygnathus communis communis and species of Protognathodus. On the Lawrence uplift the D/C boundary is disconformable, as indicated by the absence of Protognathodus kockeli before the first occurrence of Siphonodella sulcata. Light-colored phosphate laminae and beds, indicative of erosion and nondeposition, and a change in biofacies from an offshore palmatolepid–bispathodid fauna to a more nearshore, palmatolepid–polygnathid–protognathodid fauna indicate higher energy conditions and a lowering of sea level associated with the boundary interval. In the eastern Arbuckle Mountains the D/C boundary is apparently conformable, marked by a green shale interval containing a Protognathodus fauna. Species of Siphonodella, indicative of an offshore setting, characterize the third and youngest fauna. The Early Carboniferous sulcata, Lower duplicata, and Upper duplicata Zones are recognized in the upper Woodford. The Woodford Shale is conformably overlain by the “pre-Welden Shale’ and its equivalents, or unconformably overlain by the lower Caney Shale (Osagean?–Meramecian) in the northern outcrop regions and the Sycamore Formation (late Osagean?–Meramecian) in the southern Arbuckle Mountains.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , March 1992 , pp. 293 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, R. J., Smith, M. P., Norby, R. D., and Briggs, D. E. G. 1987. The architecture and function of Carboniferous polygnathacean conodont apparatuses, p. 91–104. In Aldridge, R. J. (ed.), Palaeobiology of Conodonts. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.Google Scholar
Amsden, T. W., and Klapper, G. 1972. Misener Sandstone (Middle-Upper Devonian) north-central Oklahoma. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 56:2323–2334.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. R., Kennedy, D. J., McCracken, A. D., Nowlan, G. S., and Tarrant, G. A. 1979. The structure and evolution of Ordovician conodont apparatuses. Lethaia, 12:125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrick, J. E. 1977. Multielement simple-cone conodonts from the Clarita Formation (Silurian), Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 11:47–68.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1925. Classification and stratigraphic use of conodonts. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 36:218–220.Google Scholar
Beier, J. A., and Hayes, J. M. 1989. Geochemical and isotopic evidence for paleoredox conditions during deposition of the Devonian–Mississippian New Albany Shale, southern Indiana. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 101:774–782.Google ScholarPubMed
Bergström, S. M. 1968. Biostratigraphy of the Lower Ordovician sequence at Skattungbyn, Dalarna. Geologiska Foereningens i Stokholm. Foerhandlingar, 90:454.Google Scholar
Bergström, S. M. 1971. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Middle and Upper Ordovician in Europe and eastern North America, p. 83–162. In Sweet, W. C. and Bergström, S. M. (eds.), Symposium on Conodont Biostratigraphy. Geological Society of America Memoir 127.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. 1957. Die Conodonten-Stratigraphie des rheno-herzynischen Untercarbons mit Berücksichtigung der Wocklumeria-Stufe und der Devon/Karbon-Grenze. Abhandlung des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung zu Wiesbaden, 1, 64 p.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. 1934. Conodonts from the Hannibal formation of Misssouri. University of Missouri Studies, 8:301–334 [1933].Google Scholar
Branson, E. B., and Mehl, M. G. 1934a. Conodonts from the Grassy Creek shale of Missouri. University of Missouri Studies, 8:171–259 [1933].Google Scholar
Branson, E. B., and Mehl, M. G. 1934b. Conodonts from the Bushberg sandstone and equivalent formations of Missouri. University of Missouri Studies, 8:265–299 [1933].Google Scholar
Byers, C. W. 1977. Biofacies patterns in euxinic basins: a general model, p. 5–17. In Cook, H. E. and Enos, P. (eds.), Deep-water Carbonate Environments. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caputo, M. V. 1985. Late Devonian glaciation in South America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 51:291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauff, K. M., and Price, R. C. 1980. Mitrellataxis, a new multielement genus of Late Devonian conodont. Micropaleontology, 26:177–188.Google Scholar
Clark, D. L., Sweet, W. C., Bergström, S. M., Klapper, G., Austin, R. L., Rhodes, F. H. T., Müller, K. J., Ziegler, W., Lindström, M., Miller, J.F., and Harris, A. G. 1981. Conodonta, p. W1–W202. In Robison, R. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. W, Miscellanea, Suppl. 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Cooper, B. J. 1975. Multielement conodonts from the Brassfield Limestone (Silurian) of southern Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 49:984–1008.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. L. 1939. Conodonts from a Bushberg–Hannibal horizon in Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 13:379–422.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, W. 1930. Conodonten aus dem Culm des Harzes. Palaeontological Zeitschrift, 12:177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, S. P. Jr., and Graves, R. W. Jr. 1941. Lower Pennsylvanian (Dimple Limestone) conodonts of the Marathon region, Texas. University of Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, Technical Series 14:1–13.Google Scholar
Ettensohn, F. R., and Elam, T. D. 1985. Defining the nature and location of a Late Devonian–Early Mississippian pycnocline in eastern Kentucky. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 96:1313–1321.Google Scholar
Fay, R. O. 1989. Geology of the Arbuckle Mountains along Interstate 35, Carter and Murray Counties, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 26, 50 p.Google Scholar
Flajs, G., and Feist, R. 1988. Index conodonts, trilobites and environment of the Devonian–Carboniferous boundary beds at La Serre (Montagne Noire, France). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 100:53–107.Google Scholar
Flajs, G., and Ziegler, W. (eds.). 1988. Devonian–Carboniferous boundary—Results of recent studies. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 100, 245 p.Google Scholar
Gagiev, M. H. 1979. Conodonts from the Devonian/Carboniferous boundary deposits of the Omolon Massif [in Russian with new taxa also diagnosed in English], p. 3–104. In Field Excursion Guidebook for Tour 9, Biostratigraphy and Fauna of Devonian–Carboniferous Boundary Deposits. Pacific Science Congress, 14th Khabarovsk, USSR, August 1979, supplement 2.Google Scholar
Gutschick, R. C., and Sandberg, C. A. 1983. Mississippian continental margins of the conterminous United States, p. 79–86. In Stanley, D. J. and Moore, G. T. (eds.), The Shelfbreak: Critical Interface on Continental Margins. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. W., and Hollingsworth, R. V. 1933. New Pennsylvanian conodonts from Oklahoma. American Journal of Science, 25:193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, W. H. 1959. Conodonts from the Chappel Limestone of Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 294-J:365–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, W. H., and Huddle, J. W. 1965. Late Devonian and early Mississippian age of the Woodford Shale in Oklahoma, as determined from conodonts. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 525-D:D125–D132.Google Scholar
Haywa-Branch, J. N., and Barrick, J. E. 1990. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Welden Limestone (Osagean, Mississippian), Lawrence uplift, southern Oklahoma, p. 75–84. In Ritter, S. M. (ed.), Early to Middle Paleozoic Conodont Biostratigraphy of the Arbuckle Mountains, Southern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 27.Google Scholar
Hedberg, H. D. (ed.). 1976. International Stratigraphic Guide. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 200 p.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1879. On conodonts from the Chazy and Cincinnati group of the Cambro-Silurian and from the Hamilton and Genesee shale divisions of the Devonian in Canada and the United States. Geological Society of London Quarterly Journal, 35:351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddle, J. W. 1934. Conodonts from the New Albany Shale of Indiana. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 21(72), 136 p.Google Scholar
Ji, Q., Wei, J., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Sheng, H., Wang, H., Hou, J., Xiang, L., Feng, R., and Fu, G. 1989. The Dapoushang Section, an excellent section for the Devonian–Carboniferous boundary stratotype in China. Science Press, Beijing, 165 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. G., Klapper, G., and Sandberg, C. A. 1985. Devonian eustatic fluctuations in Euramerica. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 96:567–587.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klapper, G. 1975. In Ziegler, W. (ed.), Catalogue of Conodonts II. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 404 p.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Philip, G. M. 1971. Devonian conodont apparatuses and their vicarious skeletal elements. Lethaia, 4:429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klapper, G., and Philip, G. M. 1972. Familial classification of reconstructed Devonian conodont apparatuses. Geologica et Palaeontologica, Special Volume 1, p. 97–105.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R., Sandberg, C. A., and Ziegler, W. 1980. Taxonomy and phylogeny of some Lower Carboniferous conodonts and preliminary standard post-Siphonodella zonation. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 14:117–164.Google Scholar
Lindström, M. 1964. Conodonts. Elsevier, New York, 196 p.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1962. A conodont fauna from the Banff Formation, western Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 36:1387–1391.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J., and Müller, E. M. 1957. Early Devonian (Independence) conodonts from Iowa, Part 1. Journal of Paleontology, 31:1069–1108.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S. 1980. The multielement genus Apatognathus from the Late Devonian of the Canning Basin. Alcheringa, 4:133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, R. S. 1985. Multielement composition of the conodont species Polygnathus xylus xylus Stauffer, 1940 and Ozarkodina brevis (Bischoff and Ziegler, 1957) from the Upper Devonian of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. BMR Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 9:133–147.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S. 1987. Form and function of the Pa element in the conodont animal, p. 77–90. In Aldridge, R. J. (ed.), Palaeobiology of Conodonts. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S., and Rexroad, C. B. 1987. Reexamination of Silurian conodont clusters from northern Indiana, p. 49–61. In Aldridge, R. J. (ed.), Paleobiology of Conodonts. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.Google Scholar
Norby, R. D. 1976. Conodont apparatuses from Chesterian (Mississippian) strata of Montana and Illinois. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 303 p.Google Scholar
Orth, C. J., Quintana, L. R., Gilmore, J. S., Barrick, J. E., Haywa, J. N., and Spesshardt, S. A. 1988. Pt-group metal anomalies in the Lower Mississippian of southern Oklahoma. Geology, 7:627–630.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Over, D. J., and Barrick, J. E. 1990. The Devonian/Carboniferous boundary in the Woodford Shale, Lawrence uplift, south-central Oklahoma, p. 63–73. In Ritter, S. M. (ed.), Early to Middle Paleozoic Conodont Biostratigraphy of the Arbuckle Mountains, Southern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Guidebook 27.Google Scholar
Paproth, E. 1980. The Devonian–Carboniferous boundary. Lethaia, 13:287.Google Scholar
Paproth, E., and Strell, M. 1984a. The IUGS Devonian–Carboniferous Working Group: a report on activities, 1978–1984. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 67:5–9.Google Scholar
Paproth, E., and Strell, M. (eds.). 1984b. The Devonian–Carboniferous Boundary. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 67, 258 p.Google Scholar
Parrish, J. T. 1982. Upwelling and petroleum source beds, with references to Paleozoic. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 66:750–774.Google Scholar
Pedersen, T. F., and Calvert, S. E. 1990. Anoxia vs. productivity: what controls the formation of organic-carbon-rich sediments and sedimentary rocks? American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 74:454–466.Google Scholar
Prestridge, J. D. 1959. Subdivisions of the Sycamore Formation, p. 156–164. In Petroleum Geology of Southern Oklahoma, A Symposium Sponsored by the Ardmore Geological Society, Volume II. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A. 1976. Conodont biofacies of late Devonian Polygnathus styriacus Zone in western United States, p. 171–186. In Barnes, C. R. (ed.), Conodont Paleoecology. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 15.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., and Dreesen, R. 1984. Late Devonian icriodontid biofacies models and alternate shallow-water conodont zonation, p. 143–178. In Clark, D. L. (ed.), Conodont Biofacies and Provincialism. Geological Society of America Special Paper 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., and Gutschick, R. C. 1984. Distribution, microfauna, and source-rock potential of the Mississippian Delle Phosphatic Member of Woodman Formation and equivalents, Utah and adjacent states, p. 135–178. In Woodward, J., Meissner, F. F., and Clayon, J. L. (eds.), Hydrocarbon Source Rocks of the Greater Rocky Mountain Region. Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, Denver.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., Streel, M., and Scott, R. A. 1972. Comparison between conodont zonation and spore assemblages at the Devonian–Carboniferous boundary in the western and central United States and Europe. C. R. 7ème Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère, Kerfeld, 1971, 1:179–203.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., and Ziegler, W. 1979. Taxonomy and biofacies of important conodonts of late Devonian styriacus-Zone, United States and Germany. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 13:173–212.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., Leuteritz, K., and Brill, S. M. 1978. Phylogeny, speciation and zonation of Siphonodella (Conodonta, Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous). Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 7:102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., Dreesen, R., and Butler, J. L. 1988. Part 3: Late Frasnian mass extinction: conodont event stratigraphy, global changes, and possible causes. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 102:263–307.Google Scholar
Scott, A. J. 1961. Three new conodonts from the Louisiana Limestone (Upper Devonian) of western Illinois. Journal of Paleontology, 35:1223–1229.Google Scholar
Siy, S. E. 1988. Geochemical and petrological study of phosphate nodules of the Woodford Shale (Upper Devonian–Lower Mississippian) of southern Oklahoma. Unpubl. , Texas Tech University, Lubbock, 172 p.Google Scholar
Slansky, M. 1986. Geology of Sedimentary Phosphates. Elsevier, New York, 210 p.Google Scholar
Spesshardt, S. A. 1985. Late Devonian–Early Mississippian phosphorite-bearing shales, Arbuckle Mountain region, south-central Oklahoma. Unpubl. , Texas Tech University, 109 p.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1981. Morphology and composition of elements, p. W5–W20. In Clark, D. L., Sweet, W. C., Bergström, S. M., Klapper, G., Austin, R. L., Rhodes, F. H. T., Müller, K. J., Ziegler, W., Lindström, M., Miller, J. F., and Harris, A. G., Conodonta, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part W, Miscellanea, Suppl. 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1988. The Conodonta: Morphology, Taxonomy, Paleoecology, and Evolutionary History of a Long-Extinct Animal Phylum. Oxford University Press, New York, 212 p.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C., and Schönlaub, H. P. 1975. Conodonts of the genus Oulodus Branson & Mehl, 1933. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 9:41–59.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. A. 1949. Devonian–Mississippian formations of southeast Iowa. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 60:403–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voges, A. 1959. Conodonten aus dem Unterkarbon I and II (Gattendorfia- und Pericyclus-Stufe) des Sauerlandes. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 33:266–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walliser, O. H. 1986. The IGCP Project 216 “Global Biological Events in Earth History,” p. 1–16. In Walliser, O. H. (ed.), Global Bio-Events. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.-Y., and Klapper, G. 1987. On the Genus Fungulodus (Conodonta). Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 4:369–374.Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y., and Wang, Z.-H. 1978. Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous conodonts from southern Guizhou. Academy Sinica, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology Memoir, 11:51–91.Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y., and Yin, B.-A. 1984. Conodont zonations of early Lower Carboniferous and Devonian–Carboniferous bondary in pelagic facies, south China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 23:224–241.Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y., and Yin, B.-A. 1985. An important Devonian–Carboniferous boundary stratotype in neritic facies of Yishan County, Guangxi. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 2:28–51.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1962. Taxonomie und Phylogenie oberdevonischer Conodonten und ihre stratigraphische Bedeutung: Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 38:1–166.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1969. Eine neue Conodontenfauna aus dem höchsten Oberdevon. Fortschritt Geologie Rheinland und Westfalen, 17:343–360.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. (ed.). 1975. Catalogue of Conodonts II. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 404 p.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., and Lane, H. R. 1987. Cycles in conodont evolution from Devonian to mid-Carboniferous, p. 147–163. In Aldridge, R. J. (ed.), Palaeobiology of Conodonts. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., and Sandberg, C. A. 1984. Palmatolepis-based revision of upper part of standard late Devonian conodont zonation, p. 179–194. In Clark, D. L. (ed.), Conodont Biofacies and Provincialism. Geological Society of America Special Paper 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, W., and Sandberg, C. A. 1990. The Late Devonian standard conodont zonation. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 121:1–115.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., and Austin, R. L. 1974. Revision of Bispathodus group (Conodonta) in the Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 8:97–112.Google Scholar