Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:02:45.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Matthevia (Polyplacophora) invades the Ordovician: The first reported post-Cambrian occurrence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

John Pojeta Jr. ,
John F. Taylor  and
Guy Darrough
John Pojeta Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey and Smithsonian Institution, MRC 137, Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA,
John F. Taylor
Affiliation:
Geoscience Department, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania 15705, USA
Guy Darrough
Affiliation:
2075 Rosedale Court, Arnold, Missouri 63010, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The polyplacophoran Matthevia Walcott, 1885 has been reported previously only from Cambrian rocks. Recovery of specimens of two different species of Matthevia from the top of the cherty lower Gasconade Dolomite in Missouri extends the known range of the genus into the Ordovician. The presence of the Lower Ordovician trilobite Praepatokephalus Lochman, 1964 in one collection provides the biostratigraphic evidence that the new specimens of Matthevia are Ordovician in age. Matthevia erecta n. sp. is described. An emended diagnosis for the trilobite Praepatokephalus is provided; two species of the genus are briefly described but are left in open nomenclature as P. sp. A and P. sp. B.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 5 , September 2005 , pp. 1021 - 1027
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergenhayn, J. R. M. 1955. Die Fossilen Schwedischen Loricaten nebst einer vorlaufigen Revision des Systems der ganzen Klasse Loricata. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, n.f., Avd. 2. 51(8), Kungliga Fysiografiska Sallskapets, Handlingar, a.f. Avd2, 66(8):1–41Google Scholar
Cooper, R. A., Nowlan, G. S., and Williams, S. H. 2001. Global stratotype section and point for base of the Ordovician System. Episodes, 24:19–28.Google Scholar
de Blainville, H. M. D. 1816. Prodrome d'une nouvelle distribution systématique du regne animal. Société Philomatique, Paris, Nouveau Bulletin, p. 51–53, 93–97.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J. 1938. Sobre las faunas del ordoviciano inferior del norte Argentino. Revista del Museo de la Plata, n. s., 1:109–289.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F. 1952. Lower Ordovician trilobites from western Utah and eastern Nevada. Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey Bulletin, 48, 249 p.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D. 2000. Considerations on Paleozoic Polyplacophora including the description of Plasiochiton curiosus n. gen. and sp. American Malacological Bulletin, 15:131–138.Google Scholar
Kurtz, V. E. 1981. The Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary in Missouri as determined by conodonts, p. 115–117. In Taylor, M. E. (ed.), Short Papers for the Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 81–743.Google Scholar
Lochman, C. 1964. Basal Ordovician faunas from the Williston Basin, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 38:453–476.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., and Westrop, S. 1983. Franconian trilobites of New York. New York State Museum Memoir, 23, 83 p.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1988. Conodonts as biostratigraphic tools for redefinition and correlation of the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary. Geological Magazine, 123:349–362.Google Scholar
Pojeta, J. Jr. 1987. Class Polyplacophora, p. 293–297. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Rowell, A. J. (eds.), Fossil Invertebrates. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1924. New Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites from Vermont. Boston Society of Natural History Proceedings, 37:389–406.Google Scholar
Runkel, A. C., Miller, J. F., McKay, R. M., Shaw, T. H., and Basset, D. J. 1999. Cambrian–Ordovician boundary strata in the central mid-continent of North America. Acta Universitatis Carolinae—Geologica, 43:17–20.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B., and Vendrasco, M. J. 1997. Early Paleozoic stem group chitons from Utah and Missouri: No problematica! Program and Abstracts, Combined Annual Meeting, American Malacological Union and Western Society of Malacologists, Santa Barbara, California, p. 52.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B., Pojeta, J. Jr., Taylor, M. E., and Collins, D. 1979. New species of the Cambrian and Ordovician chitons Matthevia and Chelodes from Wisconsin and Queensland: Evidence for the early history of Polyplacophoran mollusks. Journal of Paleontology, 53:1374–1394.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864. A monograph of the British trilobites, Pt. 1, Palaeontographical Society, London, Monograph for 1862:1–80.Google Scholar
Stinchcomb, B. L., and Darrough, G. 1995. Some molluscan Problematica from the Upper Cambrian–Lower Ordovician of the Ozark Uplift. Journal of Paleontology, 69:52–65.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1977. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Wichita Mountains area, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 124, 79 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1983. Trilobites, biostratigraphy, and lithostratigraphy of the Mackenzie Hill Limestone (Lower Ordovician), Wichita and Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 134, 54 p.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. F., Repetski, J. E., and Orndorff, R. C. 1992. The Stonehenge Transgression: A rapid submergence of the central Appalachian platform in the Early Ordovician, p. 409–418. In Webby, D. B. and Laurie, J. R. (eds.), Global Perspectives on Ordovician Geology. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E., and Halley, R. B. 1974. Systematics, environment, and biogeography of some Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician trilobites from eastern New York state. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 834, 38 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. L. 1991. Paleozoic Succession in Missouri, Pt. 2, Ordovician System. Missouri Division of Geology and Land Survey, Report of Investigation, 70:282.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1926. Page 90. In Butts, C., The Paleozoic rocks of Alabama. Geological Survey of Alabama, Special Report, 14.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., Foerste, A. F., and Miller, A. K. 1943. Ozarkian and Canadian cephalopods, Part II: Brevicones. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 46, 240 p.Google Scholar
Vendrasko, M. J., and Runnegar, B. 2004. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician stem group chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) from Utah and Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 78:675–698.Google Scholar
Walch, J. E. I. 1771. Die Naturgeschichte der versteinerungen zur erläuterung der Knorrischen Sammlumg von Merkwürdigkeiten der Natur. Nürnberg, 120. (This is Volume 3 of K. W. Knorr and J. E. I. Walch, 1768–1774.)Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1885. Note on some Paleozoic pteropods. American Journal of Science, 30:17–21.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1886. Second contribution to the studies of the Cambrian faunas of North America. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 30:1–369.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1924. Geological formations of Beaverfoor-Brisco-Stanford Range, British Columbia, Canada. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Publication 2788, 75:1–52.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1966. Mattheva, a proposed new class of mollusks. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 523B:1–11.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L., McAllister, J. F., and Reso, A. 1965. Stratigraphic distribution of the Late Cambrian mollusk Matthevia Walcott, 1885. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 525-B:73–78.Google Scholar