Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:27:04.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Miocene Formicidae (Amblyoponinae, Ectatomminae, ?Dolichoderinae, Formicinae, and Ponerinae) from the Foulden Maar Fossil Lagerstätte, New Zealand, and their biogeographic relevance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2016

Uwe Kaulfuss  and
Gennady M. Dlussky
Uwe Kaulfuss
Affiliation:
University of Otago, Department of Geology, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand 〈[email protected]〉
Gennady M. Dlussky
Affiliation:
Moscow State University, Biological Faculty, Moscow 199991, Russia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fossil record of Australasian Formicidae is extremely sparse. It currently comprises two ants in the subfamilies Ponerinae and Dolichoderinae from Plio/Pleistocene strata in Victoria, Australia, 14 as-yet undescribed ants from Cape York amber, and one ant in the subfamily Amblyoponinae from the early Miocene Foulden Maar in southern New Zealand. Here, we report on a diverse myrmecofauna preserved as compression fossils from Foulden Maar and describe Amblyoponinae gen. et sp. indet., Rhytidoponera waipiata n. sp., Rhytidoponera gibsoni n. sp., Myrmecorhynchus novaeseelandiae n. sp., and Austroponera schneideri n. sp. Further isolated wings are designated as Formicidae sp. A, B, and C, the former resembling a member of subfamily Dolichoderinae. Fossils of Austroponera and Myrmecorhynchus are reported for the first time, whereas Rhytidoponera waipiata n. sp. and R. gibsoni n. sp. are the first Southern Hemisphere fossil records of this genus.

The fossil taxa from Foulden Maar establish the subfamilies Ectatomminae, Formicinae, Ponerinae and, possibly, Dolichoderinae in the Australasian region in the early Miocene and provide evidence that the few native ants in the extant New Zealand fauna are the surviving remnant of taxonomically different, possibly more diverse, warm-temperate to subtropical myrmecofauna.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 89 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 1043 - 1055
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

André, E., 1896, Fourmis nouvelles d’Asie et d’Australie: Revista de Entomologia, v. 15, p. 251–265.Google Scholar
Archer, M., Hand, S., and Godthelp, H., 1991, Australia’s Lost World. Prehistoric Animals of Riversleigh, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 264 p.Google Scholar
Archibald, S.B., Cover, S.P., and Moreau, C.S., 2006, Bulldog ants of the Eocene Okanagan Highlands and history of the subfamily (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmeciinae): Annals of the Entomological Society of America, v. 99(3), p. 487–523.Google Scholar
Arillo, A., and Ortuno, V.M., 2005, Catalogue of fossil insect species described from Dominican amber (Miocene): Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde B, v. 352, 68 p.Google Scholar
Arnoldi, K.V., 1930, Studien über die Systematik der Ameisen, IV, Aulacopone, eine neue Ponerinengattung (Formicidae) in Russland: Zoologischer Anzeiger, v. 89, p. 139–144.Google Scholar
Bannister, J.M., Lee, D.E., and Raine, J.I., 2005, Morphology and palaeoenvironmental context of Fouldenia staminosa, a fossil flower with associated pollen from early Miocene Otago, New Zealand: New Zealand Journal of Botany, v. 43, p. 515–525.Google Scholar
Bannister, J.M., Conran, J.G., and Lee, D.E., 2012, Lauraceae from rainforest surrounding an early Miocene maar lake, Otago, southern New Zealand: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 178, p. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, B., 1994, Identification guide to the ant genera of the world, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 222 p.Google Scholar
Bolton, B.G., 2014, An online catalog of the ants of the world: http://www.antcat.org/ (accessed July 2014).Google Scholar
Brown, W.L., 1958a, A review of the ants of New Zealand (Hymenoptera): Acta Hymenopterologica, v. 1(1), p. 1–50.Google Scholar
Brown, W.L., 1958b, Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae, II, Tribe Ectatommini (Hymenoptera): Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, v. 118, p. 175–362.Google Scholar
Brown, W.L., 1960, Contribution towards a reclassification of the Formicidae, III, Tribe Amblyoponini (Hymenoptera): Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, v. 122, p. 145–230.Google Scholar
Brown, W.L., 1973, A comparison of the Hylean and Congo-West African rain forest ant faunas, in Meggers, B.J., Ayensu, E.S., and Duckworth, W.D., eds., Tropical Forest Ecosystems in Africa and South-America: A Comparative Review, Washington DC, Smithsonian Institute Press, p. 161–185.Google Scholar
Buckley, T.R., Krosch, M., and Leschen, R.A.B., 2014, Evolution of New Zealand insects: summary and prospectus for future research: Austral Entomology, v. 54, p. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, F.M., 1930, The fossil ants of North America: Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, v. 70, p. 1–66.Google Scholar
Clark, J., 1934a, New Australian ants: Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria, v. 8, p. 21–47.Google Scholar
Clark, J., 1934b, Ants from the Otway Ranges: Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria, v. 8, p. 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, J., 1825, British Entomology, v. 2: London, R. Taylor, p. 51–98.Google Scholar
Cranston, P.S., 2009, Biodiversity of Australasian insects, in Foottit, R., and Adler, P., eds., Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, p. 83–106.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, K.W., 1893, Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus, v. 7, Formicidae (Heterogyna), Leipzig, W. Engelmann, 289 p.Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M., 1981, Miocene ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of the USSR, in Vishnjakova, V.N., Dlussky, G.M., and Pritykina, L.N., eds., New fossil insects from the territory of the USSR, Moscow, Nauka Press, Moscow, p. 64–83. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M., 2009, The ant subfamilies Ponerinae, Cerapachyinae, and Pseudomyrmecinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the late Eocene Ambers of Europe: Paleontological Journal, v. 43(9), p. 1043–1086.Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M., and Rasnitsyn, A.P., 2002, Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Formation Green River and some other Middle Eocene deposits of North America: Russian Entomological Journal, v. 11(4), p. 411–436.Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M., and Perfilieva, K.S., 2003, Paleogene ants of the genus Archimyrmex Cockerell, 1923 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmeciinae): Paleontological Journal, v. 37(1), p. 39–47.Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M., and Rasnitsyn, A.P., 2007, Paleontological record and stages of ant evolution: Uspehi Sovremennoj Biologii, v. 127(2), p. 118–134. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M., and Rasnitsyn, A.P., 2009, Ants (Insecta: Vespida: Formicidae) in the upper Eocene amber of Central and Eastern Europe: Paleontological Journal, v. 43(9), p. 1024–1042.Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M., and Wedmann, S., 2012, The poneromorph ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae: Amblyoponinae, Ectatomminae, Ponerinae) of Grube Messel, Germany: high biodiversity in the Eocene: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 10, p. 725–753.Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M., Wappler, T., and Wedmann, S., 2009, Fossil ants of the genus Gesomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the Eocene of Europe and remarks on the evolution of arboreal ant communities: Zootaxa, v. 2031, p. 1–20.Google Scholar
Don, W., 2007, Ants of New Zealand, Dunedin, Otago University Press, 239 p.Google Scholar
Donisthorpe, H., 1940, Descriptions of new species of ants (Hym., Formicidae) from various localities: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 11(5), p. 39–48.Google Scholar
Emery, C., 1887, Catalogo delle formiche esistenti nelle collezioni del Museo Civico di Genova, parte terza, formiche della regione Indo-Malese e dell’Australia: Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo Doria, v. 5(25), p. 427–473.Google Scholar
Emery, C., 1893, Formicides de l’ Archipel Malais: Revue Suisse de Zoologie, v. 1, p. 187–229.Google Scholar
Emery, C., 1895a, Beiträge zur Kenntniss der nordamerikanischen Ameisenfauna: Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abtheilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere, v. 8, p. 257–360.Google Scholar
Emery, C., 1895b, Descriptions de quelques fourmis nouvelles d’Australie: Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, v. 39, p. 345–358.Google Scholar
Emery, C., 1920, Le genre Camonotus Mayr. Nouvel essai de la subdivision en sous-genres: Revue de Zoologie Africaine, v. 8, p. 229–260.Google Scholar
Emery, C., 1925, Hymenoptera Fam. Formicidae. Subfam: Formicinae: Genera Insectorum, v. 183, 302 p.Google Scholar
Erichson, W.F., 1842, Beitrag zur Insecten-Fauna von Vandiemensland, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der geographischen Verbreitung der Insecten: Archiv für Naturgeschichte, v. 8(1), p. 83–287.Google Scholar
Fabricus, J.C., 1804, Systema Piezatorum secundum ordines, genera, species, adjectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus, Brunswick, C. Reichard, 439 p.Google Scholar
Förster, A., 1850, Eine Centurie neuer Hymenopteren. Zweite Dekade: Verhandlungen des Naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlande und Westfalens, v. 7, p. 485–500.Google Scholar
Forel, A., 1890, Aenictus-Typhlatta découverte de M. Wroughton. Nouveaux genres de Formicides: Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, v. 34, p. 102–113.Google Scholar
Forel, A., 1892, Die Ameisen Neu-Seelands: Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, v. 8, p. 331–343.Google Scholar
Forel, A., 1895, Nouvelles fourmis de diverses provenances, surtout d’Australie: Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, v. 39, p. 41–49.Google Scholar
Forel, A., 1901, Variétés myrmécologiques: Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, v. 45, p. 334–382.Google Scholar
Forel, A., 1902, Fourmis nouvelles d’Australie: Revue Suisse de Zoologie, v. 10, p. 405–548.Google Scholar
Forel, A., 1905, Miscellanea myrmécologiques II: Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, v. 49, p. 155–185.Google Scholar
Gibbs, G., 2006, Ghosts of Gondwana. The History of Life in New Zealand, Nelson, Craig Potton, 232 p.Google Scholar
GoldbergJ.,S. J.,S., Trewick, A., and Paterson, A.M., 2008, Evolution of New Zealand’s terrestrial fauna: a review of molecular evidence: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, v. 363, p. 3319–3334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimaldi, D., and Agosti, D., 2000, A formicine in New Jersey Cretaceous amber (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and early evolution of the ants: PNAS, v. 97(25), p. 13678–13683.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D., and Engel, M.S., 2005, Evolution of the insects: Cambridge University Press, 755 p.Google Scholar
Hand, S., Archer, M., Bickel, D., Creaser, P., Dettmann, M., Godthelp, H., Jones, A., and Wicks, D., 2010, Australian Cape York Amber, in Penney, D., ed., Biodiversity of Fossils in Amber from the Major World Deposits, Manchester, Siri Scientific Press, p. 69–79.Google Scholar
Harris, A.C., 1983, An Eocene larval insect fossil (Diptera: Bibionidae) from North Otago, New Zealand: Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 13, p. 93–105.Google Scholar
Harris, A.C., Bannister, J.M., and Lee, D.E., 2007, Fossil scale insects (Hemiptera, Coccoidea, Diaspididae) in life position on an angiosperm leaf from an early Miocene lake deposit, Otago, New Zealand: Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 37(1), p. 1–13.Google Scholar
Harris, R.J., and Berry, J.A., 2001, Confirmation of the establishment of three adventive ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in New Zealand: Cardiocondyla inutior Forel, Ponera leae Forel, Mayriella abstinens Forel: New Zealand Entomologist, v. 24, p. 53–56.Google Scholar
Harrison, T., Msuya, C.P., Murray, A.M., Jacobs, B.F., Báez, A.M., Mundil, R., and Ludwig, K.R., 2001, Paleontological investigations at the Eocene locality of Mahenge in North-Central Tanzania, East Africa, in Gunell, G.F., ed., Eocene Biodiversity: Unusual occurrences and rarely sampled habitats: Topics in Geobiology, v. 18, p. 40–74.Google Scholar
Heer, O., 1849, Die Insektenfauna der Tertiärgebilde von Oeningen und von Radoboj in Croatien. Zweiter Theil: Heuschrecken, Florfliegen, Aderflügler, Schmetterlinge und Fliegen, Leipzig, W. Engelmann, 264 p.Google Scholar
Hills, E.S., 1957, Fossiliferous Tertiary resin from Allendale, Victoria: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, v. 69, p. 15–20.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E.O., 1990, The Ants: Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 228 p.Google Scholar
Janda, M., Alpert, G., and Borowiec, M., 2008, Checklist of ants described and recorded from New Guinea and associated islands: http://www.newguineants.org/ (accessed July 2014).Google Scholar
Kaspari, M., Alonso, L., and O’Donnell, S.O., 2000, Three energy variables predict ant abundance at a geographical scale: Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, v. 267, p. 485–489.Google Scholar
Kaulfuss, U., Harris, A.C., and Lee, D.E., 2010, A new fossil termite (Isoptera, Stolotermitidae, Stolotermes) from the early Miocene of Otago, New Zealand: Acta Geologica Sinica, v. 84, p. 705–709.Google Scholar
Kaulfuss, U., Wappler, T., Heiss, E., and Larivière, M.-L., 2011, Aneurus sp. from the early Miocene Foulden Maar, New Zealand: the first Southern Hemisphere record of fossil Aradidae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera): Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 41, p. 279–285.Google Scholar
Kaulfuss, U., Harris, A.C., Conran, J.G., and Lee, D.E., 2014a, An early Miocene ant (subfam. Amblyoponinae) from Foulden Maar: the first fossil Hymenoptera from New Zealand: Alcheringa, v. 38 (doi, p. 10.1080/03115518.2014.928181).Google Scholar
Kaulfuss, U., Lee, D.E., Barratt, B.I.P., Leschen, R.A.B., Larivière, M.-C., Dlussky, G.M., Henderson, I.M., and Harris, A.C., 2014b, A diverse fossil terrestrial arthropod fauna from New Zealand: evidence from the early Miocene Foulden Maar fossil lagerstätte: Lethaia, (doi, p. 10.1080/03115518.2014.928181).Google Scholar
LaPolla, J.S., Dlussky, G.M., and Perrichot, V., 2013, Ants and the fossil record: Annual Review of Entomology, v. 58, p. 609–630.Google Scholar
Lee, D.E., Lee, W.G., and Mortimer, N., 2001, Where and why have all the flowers gone? Depletion and turnover in the New Zealand Cenozoic angiosperm flora in relation to paleogeography and climate: Australian Journal of Botany, v. 49, p. 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.E., Conran, J.G., Lindqvist, J.K., Bannister, J.M., and Mildenhall, D.C., 2012, New Zealand Eocene, Oligocene and Miocene macrofossil and pollen records and modern plant distributions in the Southern Hemisphere: Botanical Review, v. 78, p. 235–260.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, J.K., and Lee, D.E., 2009, High-frequency paleoclimate signals from Foulden Maar, Waipiata Volcanic Field, southern New Zealand: an early Miocene varved lacustrine diatomite deposit: Sedimentary Geology, v. 222, p. 98–110.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758, Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, Tomus I, Editio decima, reformata: Stockholm, L. Salvii, 824 p.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J., 1883, Observations on ants, bees, and wasps, part X, with a description of a new genus of honey-ant: Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, v. 17, p. 41–52.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 1887, Südamerikanische Formiciden: Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, v. 37, p. 511–632.Google Scholar
Mayr, G.L., 1861, Die europäischen Formiciden, Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet, Wien, Gerolds Sohn, 80 p.Google Scholar
Mayr, G.L., 1862, Myrmecologische Studien: Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, v. 12, p. 649–776.Google Scholar
Mayr, G.L., 1865, Formicidae, in Reise der Österreichischen Fregatte “Novara” um die Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859, band II, abtheilung 1, Wien, Gerolds Sohn, 119 p.Google Scholar
Mayr, G.L., 1868, Die Ameisen des baltischen Bernsteins: Beiträge zur Naturkunde Preussens, v. 1, p. 1–102.Google Scholar
McAreavey, J.J., 1957, Revision of the genus Stigmacros Forel: Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria, v. 21, p. 7–64.Google Scholar
McGowran, B., Archer, M., Bock, P., Darragh, T.A., Godthelp, H., Hageman, S., ….Warne, M., 2000, Australasian palaeobiography: the Palaeogene and Neogene record, in Wright, A.J., Young, G.C., Talent, J.A., and Laurie, J.R., eds., Palaeobiogeography of Australian faunas and floras: Association of Australian Palaeontologists Memoir, v. 23, p. 405–470.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W., 1803, Versuch einer neuen Gattungstheilung der europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten: Magazin für Naturkunde, v. 2, p. 259–281.Google Scholar
Mildenhall, D.C., Kennedy, E.M., Lee, D.E., Kaulfuss, U., Bannister, J.M., Fox, B., and Conran, J.G., 2014, Palynology of the early Miocene Foulden Maar, Otago, New Zealand: diversity following destruction: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 204, p. 27–42.Google Scholar
Motschoulsky, V.I., 1863, Essai d’un catalogue des insectes de l’ile Ceylan: Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, v. 36, p. 1–153.Google Scholar
Oke, C.G., 1957, Fossil insecta from Cainozoic Resin at Allendale, Victoria: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, v. 69, p. 29–31.Google Scholar
Perrichot, V., Antoine, P.-O., Salas-Gismondi, R., Flynn, J.J., and Engel, M.S., 2014, The genus Macroteleia Westwood in Middle Miocene amber from Peru (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae s.l., Scelioninae): ZooKeys, v. 426, p. 119–127.Google Scholar
Pole, M., 1996, Plant macrofossils from the Foulden Hills Diatomite (Miocene), Central Otago, New Zealand: Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 26(1), p. 1–39.Google Scholar
Prokofiev, A.M., 2007, Redescription of a Fossil Loach Triplophysa opinata (Yakowlew, 1959) from the Miocene of Kirgizia (Balitoridae: Nemacheilinae): Journal of Ichthyology, v. 47(1), p. 26–31.Google Scholar
Rasnitsyn, A.P., 1980, The origin and evolution of hymenopterous insects: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademiya Nauk SSSR, v. 174, p. 1–192. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Roger, J., 1859, Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Ameisenfauna der Mittelmeerländer I: Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift, v. 3, p. 225–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roger, J., 1862, Einige neue exotische Ameisen-Gattungen und Arten: Berliner Entomologischer Anzeiger, v. 6, p. 233–254.Google Scholar
Roger, J., 1863, Die neu aufgeführten Gattungen und Arten meines Formiciden-Verzeichnisses nebst Ergänzung einiger früher gegebenen Beschreibungen: Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift, v. 7, p. 131–214.Google Scholar
Rossi de Garcia, E., 1983, Insectos fósiles en la Formación Ventana (Eoceno): Provincia de Neuquén: Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, v. 38, p. 17–23.Google Scholar
Rust, J., and Andersen, N.M., 1999, Giant ants from the Paleogene of Denmark with a discussion of the fossil history and early evolution of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 125, p. 331–348.Google Scholar
Rust, J. et al., 2010, Biogeographic and evolutionary implications of a diverse paleobiota in amber from the early Eocene of India: PNAS, v. 107(43), p. 18360–18365.Google Scholar
Santschi, F., 1914, Formicides de l’Afrique occidentale et australe du voyage de Mr. le Professeur F. Silvestri: Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della Reale Scuola Superiore d’Agricoltura, v. 8, p. 309–385.Google Scholar
Sarnat, E.M., and Economo, E.P., 2012, Ants of Fiji, Berkeley, University of California Press, 384 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C.A., and Shattuck, S.O., 2014, The Higher Classification of the Ant Subfamily Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a Review of Ponerine Ecology and Behavior: Zootaxa, Monograph, v. 3817, p. 1–242.Google Scholar
Shattuck, S.O., 1999, Australian ants, their biology and identification: CSIRO Monographs on Invertebrate Taxonomy, v. 3, p. 226 p.Google Scholar
Smith, F., 1857, Cataloque of the hymenopterous insects collected at Sarawak, Borneo; Mount Ophir, Malacca; and at Singapore, by Wallace, A.R.: Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, v. 2, p. 42–88.Google Scholar
Smith, F., 1858, Catalogue of Hymenopterous Insects in the collection of the British Museum, part VI, Formicidae, London, British Museum, 216 p.Google Scholar
Smith, F., 1860, Catalogue of hymenopterous insects collected by Mr. A. R. Wallace in the islands of Bachian, Kaisaa, Amboyna, Gilolo, and at Dory in New Guinea: Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, v. 5(17b), p. 93–143.Google Scholar
Smith, F., 1862, Descriptions of new species of Australian Hymenoptera, and of a species of Formica from New Zealand: Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, v. 11(2), p. 53–62.Google Scholar
Smith, F., 1876, Descriptions of new species of hymenopterous insects of New Zealand, collected by C. M. Wakefield, Esq., principally in the neighbourhood of Canterbury: Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, v. 24, p. 473–487.Google Scholar
Solórzano Kraemer, M.M., 2007, Systematic, palaeoecology, and palaeobiogeography of the insect fauna from Mexican amber: Palaeontographica, Abt. A, v. 282, p. 133.Google Scholar
Sonibare, O.O., Agbaje, O.B., Jacob, D.E., Faithfull, J., Hoffmann, T., and Foley, S.F., 2014, Terpenoid composition and origin of amber from the Cape York Peninsula, Australia: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 61(7), p. 979–985.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.W., 1987, A checklist of the ants of Australia, New Caledonia and New Zealand (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): CSIRO Division of Entomology Report, v. 41, 92 p.Google Scholar
Viana, M.J., and Rossi, J.A.H., 1957, Primer hallazgo en el hemisferio sur de Formicidae extinguidos y catalogo mundial de los Formicidae fosiles: Ameghiniana, v. 1, p. 108–113.Google Scholar
Ward, P.S., 1985, Taxonomic congruence and disparity in an insular ant fauna: Rhytidoponera in New Caledonia: Systematic Zoology, v. 34, p. 140–151.Google Scholar
Watt, J.C., 1975, The terrestrial insects, in Kuschel, G., ed., Biogeography and ecology in New Zealand, Den Haag, W. Junk Publishers, p. 507–535.Google Scholar
Wesmael, C., 1838, Sur une nouvelle espèce de fourmi du Mexique: Bulletin de l’Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles, v. 5, p. 766–771.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W.M., 1915, The ants of the Baltic Amber: Schriften der Physikalisch-Ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg, v. 55, p. 1–142.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W.M., 1918, The ants of the genus Opisthopsis Emery: Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, v. 62, p. 341–362.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O., and Taylor, R.W., 1964, A fossil ant colony: new evidence of social antiquity: Psyche, v. 71, p. 93–103.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, M., and Fisher, B.L., 2012, A revision of male ants of the Malagasy Amblyoponinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with resurrections of the genera Stigmatomma and Xymmer: PLoS ONE, v. 7(e33325), 1–18.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., 1989, Fossil insects from Shangwang, Shandong, China, Jinan, Shandong Science and Technology Publishing House, 459 p.Google Scholar