Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:10:53.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tightly Combined BeiDou B2 and Galileo E5b Signals for Precise Relative Positioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

Mingkui Wu
Affiliation:
(School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China)
Xiaohong Zhang
Affiliation:
(School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China) (Collaborative Innovation Centre for Geospatial Technology, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China) (Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China)
Wanke Liu*
Affiliation:
(School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China) (Collaborative Innovation Centre for Geospatial Technology, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China) (Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China)
Shaojie Ni
Affiliation:
(Satellite Navigation Engineering Research Center, National University of Defense Technology, 190 Deya Road, Changsha, 410073, P.R. China)
Shun Yu
Affiliation:
(School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China)
*

Abstract

In precise relative positioning applications, an effective approach to improve the interoperability of GNSS systems is the tightly combining or inter-system double-differencing of observations from the common frequencies that are shared by different constellations. As the BeiDou satellites are currently transmitting a B2 signal at 1207.14 MHz that is identical to the Galileo E5b signal, the inter-system double-differenced observations can also be created between observations from both systems at that particular frequency. In this paper, we will focus on the instantaneous ambiguity resolution performance analysis of tightly combining BeiDou B2 and Galileo E5b observations. The size and stability of phase and code Differential Inter-System Biases (DISBs) between BeiDou B2 and Galileo E5b signals are first investigated, in which the new BeiDou and Galileo satellites launched recently will also be included. Then, first results of the Tightly Combined Model (TCM) with a priori corrected DISBs (TCM_C) are evaluated in comparison to the Loosely Combined Model (LCM) and tightly combined model with unknown DISBs (TCM_F) in an instantaneous approach. It is demonstrated that the instantaneous integer ambiguity resolution performance can be improved using the TCM_C with respect to LCM and TCM_F.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gibbons, G. (2011). GNSS Interoperability. Inside GNSS, 6, 2831.Google Scholar
Hegarty, C., Powers, E., and Foville, B. (2004). Accounting for timing biases between GPS, modernized GPS, and Galileo signals. Proceedings of 36th annual precise time and time interval meeting,Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hellemans, A. (2014) A simple plumbing problem sent Galileo satellites into wrong orbits. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/satellites/a-simple-plumbing-problem-sent-galileo-satellites-into-wrong-orbits. Accessed 13 October 2014.Google Scholar
Julien, O., Alves, P., Cannon, M.E., and Zhang, W. (2003). A tightly coupled GPS/GALILEO combination for improved ambiguity resolution. Proceedings of the European Navigation Conference(ENC-GNSS’03), Graz, Austria.Google Scholar
Lau, L., Tateshita, H., and Sato, K. (2015). Impact of Multi-GNSS on Positioning Accuracy and Multipath Errors in High-Precision Single-Epoch Solutions–A Case Study in Ningbo China. Journal of Navigation, 68, 9991017.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Shu, B., Xu, L., Qian, C., Zhang, R., and Zhang, M. (2017). Accounting for Inter-System Bias in DGNSS Positioning with GPS/GLONASS/BDS/Galileo. Journal of Navigation, 113.Google Scholar
Montenbruck, O., Hauschild, A. and Hessels, U. (2011). Characterization of GPS/GIOVE sensor stations in the CONGO network. GPS Solutions, 15, 193205.Google Scholar
Nadarajah, N., Khodabandeh, A. and Teunissen, P.J.G. (2015). Assessing the IRNSS L5-signal in combination with GPS, Galileo, and QZSS L5/E5a-signals for positioning and navigation. GPS Solutions, 20, 289297.Google Scholar
Odijk, D. and Teunissen, P.J.G. (2013a). Characterization of between receiver GPS-Galileo inter-system biases and their effect on mixed ambiguity resolution. GPS Solutions, 17, 521533.Google Scholar
Odijk, D. and Teunissen, P.J.G. (2013b). Estimation of differential inter-system biases between the overlapping frequencies of GPS, Galileo, BeiDou and QZSS. Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquium Scientific and Fundamental Aspects of the Galileo Programme, Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Odijk, D., Nadarajah, N., Zaminpardaz, S. and Teunissen, P.J.G. (2017). GPS, Galileo, QZSS and IRNSS differential ISBs: estimation and application. GPS Solutions, 21, 439450.Google Scholar
Odolinski, R., Teunissen, P.J.G. and Odijk, D. (2014). First combined COMPASS/BeiDou-2 and GPS positioning results in Australia. Part II: Single-and multiple-frequency single-baseline RTK positioning. Journal of Spatial Science, 59, 2546.Google Scholar
Odolinski, R., Teunissen, P.J.G. and Odijk, D. (2015). Combined BDS, Galileo, QZSS and GPS single-frequency RTK. GPS Solutions, 19, 151163.Google Scholar
Paziewski, J. and Wielgosz, P. (2015). Accounting for Galileo-GPS inter-system biases in precise satellite positioning. Journal of Geodesy, 89, 8193.Google Scholar
Quan, Y., Lau, L., Roberts, G., and Meng, X. (2016). Measurement Signal Quality Assessment on All Available and New Signals of Multi-GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BDS, and QZSS) with Real Data. Journal of Navigation, 69, 313334.Google Scholar
Teunissen, P.J.G. (1998). Success probability of integer GPS ambiguity rounding and bootstrapping. Journal of Geodesy, 72, 606612.Google Scholar
Teunissen, P.J.G. and Verhagen, S. (2009). The GNSS ambiguity ratio-test revisited: a better way of using it. Survey Review, 41, 138151.Google Scholar
Teunissen, P.J.G., Odolinski, R. and Odijk, D. (2014). Instantaneous BeiDou+GPS RTK positioning with high cut-off elevation angles. Journal of Geodesy, 88, 335350.Google Scholar
Verhagen, S. and Teunissen, P.J.G. (2013). The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution (2013). GPS Solutions, 17, 535548.Google Scholar
Xiao, W., Liu, W. and Sun, G. (2016). Modernization milestone: BeiDou M2-S initial signal analysis. GPS Solutions, 20, 125133.Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. and Zhang, B. (2014) Retrieval of inter-system biases (ISBs) using a network of multi-GNSS receivers. Journal of Global Positioning System, 13, 2229.Google Scholar