Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:24:08.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Evaluation of Aircraft Collision Probabilities at Intersecting Air Routes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

D. A. Hsu
Affiliation:
(University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee)

Extract

In this article formulas useful for the calculation of aircraft mid-air collision probabilities at intersecting air routes are developed. The aircraft overlap density, a key parameter in the calculation, is expressed as a function of the intersection angle of air routes, aircraft speeds, the nominal separation, and parameters in the position-error distribution. Two representative probability models for position errors are used to illustrate the computational procedures suggested. A method of approximation over large navigation systems is also proposed.

The calculation of aircraft mid-air collision probabilities is an important step in the design of air-route structure and is a key element in the specification of separation standards and minimum requirements of facilities reliability and accuracy. A thorough analysis of collision probabilities for long-range parallel air routes over oceanic areas was reported by P. G. Reich in three research documents and in a series of papers published in this Journal in 1966. Analysis of collision probabilities at intersecting air routes typical in off-shore and continental areas, however, has not been fully explored to date. The only direct reference available on this subject appears to be the work by Bellantoni,7 in which a collision problem was formulated in the three-dimensional space and was apt to deal with airport terminal landing or take-off situations. For circumstances where horizontal linear air routes intersect one another at preassigned positions, the analysis provided by Bellantoni needs to be simplified and refashioned for use in extensive applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Reich, P. G. (1964). A theory of safe separation standards for air traffic control. Royal Aircraft Establishment Technical Report 64041.Google Scholar
2Reich, P. G. (1964). An analysis of planned aircraft proximity and its relation to collision risk with special reference to the North Atlantic region 1965–71. Royal Aircraft Establishment Technical Report 64042.Google Scholar
3Reich, P. G. (1964). Separation standards in the North Atlantic region 1965–71 in the light of recent measurements of flying errors. Royal Aircraft Establishment Technical Report, no. 64043.Google Scholar
4Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems — separation standards: I. This Journal, 19, 88.Google Scholar
5Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems — separation standards: II. This Journal, 19, 169.Google Scholar
6Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems — separation standards: III. This Journal, 19, 331.Google Scholar
7Bellantoni, J.F. (1973). The calculation of aircraft collision probabilities. Transportation Science, 7, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Hsu, D. A. (1979). Long-tailed distributions for position errors in navigation. The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 28, 62.Google Scholar
9Hsu, D. A. (1979). An analysis of error distributions in navigation (with comments by E. W. Anderson). This Journal, 32, 426.Google Scholar
10Hsu, D. A. (1980). Further analyses of position errors in navigation. This Journal, 33, 452.Google Scholar
11Siddiqee, W. (1973). A mathematical model for predicting the number of potential conflict situations at intersecting air routes. Transportation Science, 7, 158.Google Scholar
12Anderson, E. W. (1965). Is the gaussian distribution normal? This Journal, 18, 65.Google Scholar
13Anderson, E. W. and Ellis, D.M. (1971). Error distributions in navigation. This Journal, 24, 429.Google Scholar