Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T04:57:28.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Results of Shock Therapy Evaluated by Estimating Chances of Patients Remaining in Hospital Without Such Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

L. S. Penrose
Affiliation:
Division of Medical Statistics, Ontario Department of Health, March, 1943
W. B. Marr
Affiliation:
Division of Medical Statistics, Ontario Department of Health, March, 1943

Extract

The problem of estimating objectively the value of any new form of treatment is constantly presenting itself in all branches of medical work. In the case of shock therapy applied in the treatment of mental disease, the task is especially difficult. Standards of initial severity and degrees of improvement in mental diseases are subject to very wide interpretations. Disagreement on questions of diagnosis is common even among psychiatrists who employ the same terminologies. Thus, it is not surprising to find that widely divergent claims have been made about the value of shock treatment in mental diseases. In most of the large surveys, patients have been classified as (i) Recovered, (ii) Much improved, (iii) Improved, or (iv) Unimproved after shock treatment, but little unanimity about the results has emerged. In Table I, the figures given by Malzberg (1938) and Pollock (1939) for New York State and those for Ohio, given by Bateman and Michael (1940), are compared with figures obtained in a survey of the Ontario Mental Hospitals in 1941.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1943 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateman, J. F., and Michael, (1940), Am. J. Psychiat., 96, 61.Google Scholar
Bond, E. D. (1941), Am. J. Psychiat., 97, 1024.Google Scholar
Dayton, N. A. (1940), New Facts on Mental Disorder. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Guttmann, E., Mayer-Gross, W., and Slater, E. T. O. (1939), J. Neur. Psychiat., 2, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malzberg, B. (1938), Psychiat. Quart., 12, 528.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S. (1943) Further Report on the 1938–1941 Shock-treated Cases in the Ontario Hospitals, Ontario Dept. of Health.Google Scholar
Pollock, H. M. (1939), Psychiat. Quart., 13, 558.Google Scholar
Ziskind, E., Somerfeld, E., and Ziskind, L. (1942), J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 96, 460.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.