Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:47:32.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conflict Avoidance in Obsessionals and Hysterics, and the Validity of the Concept of Dysthymia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Vernon Hamilton*
Affiliation:
South West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board

Extract

This paper sets out to demonstrate similarities of behaviour between obsessionals and hysterics in responses to perceptual conflict, which might be expected on the basis of psycho-analytical theories, but which could not be predicted from the dimensional framework of personality favoured by Eysenck in which obsessionals and hysterics are found at opposite poles of an introversion-extroversion continuum, and in which anxiety states, depressives and obsessionals are grouped together in one indistinguishable category of dysthymia.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1957 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balken, B. R., and Masserman, J. H., “The Language of Phantasy: III. The Language of the Phantasies of Patients with Conversion Hysteria, Anxiety State and Obsessive-Compulsive Neurosis”, J. Psychol., 1940, 10, 7586.Google Scholar
Barron, F., “Complexity-Simplicity as a Personality Dimension”, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psych., 1953, 48, 163170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J., Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , The Scientific Study of Personality, 1952. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , The Structure of Human Personality, 1953. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Idem , “A Dynamic Theory of Anxiety and Hysteria”, J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 2551.Google Scholar
Frenkel-Brunswick, E., “Intolerance of Ambiguity as an Emotional and Perceptual Personality Variable”, J. Person., 1949, 18, 108143.Google Scholar
Fenichel, O., The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis, 1945. New York: W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Freud, A., The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence, 1942. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S., Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety, 1948. London: The Hogarth Press. First published in 1926.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V., “Reaction to Uncertainty and Ambiguity as a Personality Variable”, 1956a. Unpublished Doctor's Dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Idem , “Eysenck's Dynamic Theory of Anxiety and Hysteria—A Methodical Critique”, 1956b. Unpublished Dissertation in Part Fulfilment of the Academic Post-graduate Diploma of Psychology, University of London.Google Scholar
Idem , “Perceptual and Personality Dynamics in Responses to Ambiguity”, Brit. J. Psych., 1957. To appear.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, H. P., “A Factorial Study of Introversion-Extraversion by means of Objective Tests”, 1953. Unpublished Doctor's Dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G., Psychological Types, 1923. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Klein, G. S., The Personal World Through Perception—in Perception—An Approach to Personality, 1951 (ed. Blake, R. R., and Ramsey, G. V.). New York: The Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
Idem , Need and Regulation, in Nebraska. Symposium on Motivation, 1954 (ed. Jones, M. R.). Lincoln: Union of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Luchins, A. S., “Social Influences on Perception of Complex Drawings”, J. Soc. Psych., 1945, 21, 257263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, H. B., and Whitney, D. R., “On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables is Statistically Larger than the Other”, Annals of Mathem. Stat., 1947, 18, 5059.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, B. G., “Compulsiveness as a Determinant in Selected Cognitive Perceptual Performances”, J. Person., 1953, 21, 506—16.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.