Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:38:14.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between nanohardness and microstructures in high-purity Fe–C as-quenched and quench-tempered martensite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

T. Ohmura ,
T. Hara  and
K. Tsuzaki
T. Ohmura
Affiliation:
Steel Research Center, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305–0047, Japan
T. Hara
Affiliation:
Steel Research Center, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305–0047, Japan
K. Tsuzaki
Affiliation:
Steel Research Center, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305–0047, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The relationship between the nanohardness and the microstructures in the Fe–C martensite was studied to understand the contributions of the matrix and the grain boundary to the macroscopic strength. As-quenched martensite was examined for five kinds of Fe–C alloys with various carbon contents in the range of 0.1–0.8 mass%, while quench-tempered martensite was investigated for an Fe–0.4% C alloy. The ratio of the nanohardness to the macrohardness Hn/Hv was much smaller for the Fe–C martensite than those for the single crystals, indicating that there is a significant grain-boundary effect for the martensite. The ratio Hn/Hv of the as-quenched martensite decreased with an increase in the carbon content since the size of the block structure decreased with increasing carbon content. For the quench-tempered specimens, a significant reduction of the grain-boundary effect occured at the tempering temperature of 723 K. It is mainly due to the depression of the locking parameter caused by the disappearance of the film-like carbides on the boundaries.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , June 2003 , pp. 1465 - 1470
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Leslie, W.C. and Sober, R.J., Trans. ASM 60, 459 (1967).Google Scholar
2.Norstrom, L-A., Scand. J. Metall. 5, 159 (1976).Google Scholar
3.Pickering, F.B., Hardenability Concepts with Applications to Steel (AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1978), p. 179.Google Scholar
4.Krauss, G., Hardenability Concepts with Applications to Steel (AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1978), p. 229.Google Scholar
5.Krauss, G., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 273–275, 40 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Marder, A.R. and Krauss, G., Trans. ASM 60, 651 (1967).Google Scholar
7.Marder, J.M. and Marder, A.R., Trans. ASM 62, 1 (1969).Google Scholar
8.Marder, A.R. and Krauss, G., Trans. ASM 62, 957 (1969).Google Scholar
9.Maki, T., Tsuzaki, K., and Tamura, I., Trans ISIJ 20, 207 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ohmura, T., Tsuzaki, K., and Matsuoka, S., Scripta Mater. 45, 889 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Ohmura, T., Tsuzaki, K., and Matsuoka, S., Philos. Mag. A 82, 1903 (2002).Google Scholar
12.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Dörnen, P. and Hofman, W., Arch. Eisenhütt 30, 627 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Itokazu, M. and Murakami, Y., Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. A 59, 2560 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Miyahara, K., Matsuoka, S., and Hayashi, T., Metall. Mater. Trans. 32A, 761 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Caron, R.N. and Krauss, G., Metall. Trans. 3, 2381 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar