Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:29:38.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low temperature synthesis of lead titanate by a hydrothermal method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Jooho Moon ,
Tuo Li ,
Clive A. Randall  and
James H. Adair
Jooho Moon
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Tuo Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Clive A. Randall
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
James H. Adair
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Get access

Abstract

Alkoxide-based hydrothermal powder synthesis of lead titanate was investigated. The objective of this work was to lower the synthesis temperature. By modifying titanium isopropoxide with acetylacetone during solution mixing, the phase-pure lead titanate with perovskite structure was synthesized at temperatures as low as 150 °C. It was determined that the pH of the hydrothermal reaction medium and the initial Pb/Ti ratio are critical factors in forming stoichiometric PbTiO3. When the pH of the initial feedstock is above 14 and the Pb/Ti ratio is greater than 1.5, a phase-pure PbTiO3 can be obtained. The modification of titanium alkoxide gave rise to the formation of a stable complex against hydrolysis and eventually reduced the synthesis temperature significantly. A possible formation mechanism for PbTiO3 is the dissolution-recrystallization from an amorphous precursor to a well-crystalline product as originally proposed by Rossetti et al. Hall–Williamson analysis was also performed on the hydrothermally derived PbTiO3 to interpret the systematic peak broadening and asymmetry for {001} reflections, unlike the commercial PbTiO3. It was observed that the strain in the c-axis direction is much higher than that in the a-axis direction while the domain sizes for both directions are similar. This strain anisotropy exerted in the particles may indicate a unique domain structure in the hydrothermally synthesized particles in which either only 180° domains exist or possibly only a single domain.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 189 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Johnson, W., Jr., in Advances in Ceramics, Vol. 21, Ceramic Powder Science, edited by Messing, G. L., Mazdiyasni, K. S., McCauley, J. W., and Haber, R. A. (The American Ceramic Society Inc., Westerville, OH, 1987), p. 3.Google Scholar
2.Matijević, E., Chem. Mater. 5, 412 (1993).Google Scholar
3.Dawson, W. J., Preston, J. C., and Swartz, S. L., in Ceramic Transactions, Vol. 22, Ceramic Powder Science IV, edited by Hirano, S., Messing, G. L., and Hausner, H. (The American Ceramic Society, Inc., Westerville, OH, 1991), p. 27.Google Scholar
4.Hirano, S., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 66 (9), 1342 (1987).Google Scholar
5.Barringer, E., Jubb, N., Fegley, B., Pober, R. L., and Bowen, H. K., in Ultrastructure Processing of Ceramics, Glasses, and Composites, edited by Hench, L. L. and Ulrich, D. R. (John Wiley & Son, New York, 1984), p. 315.Google Scholar
6.Jaffe, B., Cook, W. R., Jr., and Jaffe, H., Piezoelectric Ceramics (Academic Press, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
7.Blum, J. B. and Gurkovich, S. R., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 4479 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Fox, G. R., Adair, J. H., and Newnham, R. E., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 3634 (1990).Google Scholar
9.Kim, M. J. and Matijević, E., Chem. Mater. 1, 363 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Watson, D. J., Randall, C. A., Newnham, R. E., and Adair, J. H., in Ceramics Transactions, Vol. 1, Ceramic Powder Science II, edited by Messing, G. L., Fuller, E. R. Jr. and Hausner, H. (The American Ceramic Society Inc., Westerville, OH, 1988), p. 154.Google Scholar
11.Suzuki, M., Uedaira, S., Masuya, H., and Tamura, H., in Ceramics Transactions, Vol. 1, Ceramic Powder Science II, edited by Messing, G. L., Fuller, E. R. Jr. and Hausner, H. (The American Ceramic Society Inc., Westerville, OH, 1988), p. 163.Google Scholar
12.Arendt, R. H. and Rosolowski, J. H., Molten Salt Synthesis of Lead Zirconate Titanate Solid Solution Powder, U.S. Patent, 4 152 282, May 1, 1979.Google Scholar
13.Shrout, T. R., Papet, P., Kim, S., and Lee, G-H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (7), 1862 (1990).Google Scholar
14.Dawson, W. J., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 67 (10), 1673 (1988).Google Scholar
15.Cheng, H., Ma, J., Zhao, Z., and Qiang, D., Am. Ceram. Soc. 75 (5), 1125 (1992).Google Scholar
16.Kutty, T. R. N. and Balachandran, R., Mater. Res. Bull. 19, 1479 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Sanchez, C., Toledano, P., and Ribot, F., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV, edited by Zelinski, B. J., Brinker, C. J., Clark, D. E., and Ulrich, D. R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 180, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 47.Google Scholar
18.Livage, J., Henry, M., Jolivet, J. P., and Sanchez, C., Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. XV (1), 18 (1990).Google Scholar
19.Yamanoto, A. and Kambara, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 4344 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Leaustic, A., Babonneau, F., and Livage, J., Chem. Mater. 1, 240 (1989).Google Scholar
21. ibid, Chem. Mater. 1, 248 (1989).Google Scholar
22.Phulé, P. P. and Khairulla, F., in Ceramics Transactions, Vol. 12, Ceramic Powder Science III, edited by Messing, G. L., Hirano, S-I. Jr. and Hausner, H. (The American Ceramic Society Inc., Westerville, OH, 1990), p. 725.Google Scholar
23.Milne, S. J. and Pyke, S. H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (6), 1407 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Hubert-Pfalzgraf, L. G., Poncelet, O., and Daran, J-C., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV, edited by Zelinski, B. J., Brinker, C. J., Clark, D. E., and Ulrich, D. R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 180, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 73.Google Scholar
25.Beal, K. C., in Advances in Ceramics, Vol. 21, Ceramic Powder Science, edited by Messing, G. L., Mazdiyasni, K. S., McCauley, J. W., and Haber, R. A. (The American Ceramic Society Inc, Westerville, OH, 1987), p. 33.Google Scholar
26.Lencka, M. M. and Riman, R. E., Chem. Mater. 5, 61 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Williamson, G. K. and Hall, W. H., Acta Metall. 1, 22 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E., X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
29.Li, Z., Foster, C. M., Dai, X-H., Xu, X-Z., Chan, S-K., and Lam, D. J., J. Appl. Phys. 71 (9), 4481 (1992).Google Scholar
30.Arlt, G., Ferroelectrics 104, 217 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Randall, C. A., Kim, N., Cao, W., and Shrout, T. R., in Proceedings of the Seventh US-Japan Seminar on Dielectrics and Piezoelectrics, edited by Yamamoto, T., Tsukuba, Nov. 14 (1995).Google Scholar
32.Cao, W. and Randall, C. A., J. Phys. Chem. (1996, in press).Google Scholar
33.Rossetti, G. A., Jr., Cao, W., and Randall, C. A., Ferroelectrics 158, 343 (1994).Google Scholar
34.Allen, T., Particle Size Measurement (Chapman and Hall, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
35.Scheaffer, R. L. and McClave, J. T., Probability and Statistics for Engineers (PWS-KENT, Boston, MA, 1990).Google Scholar
36.Rossetti, G. A., Jr., Watson, D. J., Newnham, R. E., and Adair, J. H., J. Cryst. Growth 116, 251 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Moon, J., Costantino, S. A., and Adair, J. H., unpublished.Google Scholar
38.Moon, J., Li, T., Costantino, S. A., and Adair, J. H., unpublished.Google Scholar