Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:31:05.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetics of PbTiO3 perovskite phase formation via an interfacial reaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yun-Mo Sung*
Affiliation:
Advanced Nonomaterials Laboratory (ANL), Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Daejin University, Pochun-koon, Kyunggi-do 487–711, Korea (South)
Woo-Chul Kwak
Affiliation:
Advanced Nonomaterials Laboratory (ANL), Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Daejin University, Pochun-koon, Kyunggi-do 487–711, Korea (South)
Sungtae Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The kinetics of the formation of PbTiO3 at the PbO/TiO2 interface has been analyzed. The flux of Pb2+ and O2− ions through the PbTiO3 layer was used to derive the kinetics equation for the formation of the PbTiO3 phase. On the basis of the parabolic growth kinetics of the PbTiO3 interlayer, the reaction rate constant (k) for PbTiO3 formation was determined as a function of the average diffusion coefficient of the Pb2+ ions (DPb2+). By employment of the data from diffusion couple experiments and the free energy values for the formation of the PbTiO3 phase () into the present kinetics equation, DPb2+ in the PbTiO3 interlayer was calculated with respect to the corresponding temperature. The activation energy for diffusion (Q) and the diffusion constant (D0) of Pb2+ ions in the PbTiO3 layer could be evaluated from the Arrhenius plot of DPb2+.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Kingery, W.D., Bowen, H.K., and Uhlmann, D.R., Introduction to Ceramics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976), p. 968.Google Scholar
2.Moulson, A.J. and Herbert, J.M., Electroceramics (Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom, 1990), p. 68.Google Scholar
3.Chiang, Y-M., Birnue, D. III, and Kingery, W.D., Physical Ceramics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997), p. 59.Google Scholar
4.Kato, K., Zheng, C., Finder, J.M., and Dey, S.K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 1869 (1998).Google Scholar
5.Takata, T., Tanaka, A., Hara, M., Kondo, J.N., and Domen, K., Catal. Today 44, 17 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Jang, S-I., Choi, B-C., and Jang, H.M., J. Mater. Res. 12, 1327 (1997).Google Scholar
7.Lu, C-H. and Wu, J-F., J. Mater. Res. 11, 3064 (1996).Google Scholar
8.Huang, Z., Zhang, Q., and Whatmore, R.W., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 1662 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Babushkin, O., Lindback, T., Brooks, K., and Setta, N., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 17, 813 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Lee, H-Y. and Wu, T-B., J. Mater. Res. 13, 2291 (1998).Google Scholar
11.Tiwari, V.S., Kumar, A., and Wadhawan, V.K., J. Mater. Res. 13, 2170 (1998).Google Scholar
12.Li, C.C. and Desu, S.B., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 1 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kissinger, H.E., J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) 57, 2170 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Ozawa, T., Polymer 12, 150 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Sung, Y-M., Acta Mater. 48, 2157 (2000).Google Scholar
16.Kingery, W.D., Bowen, H.K., and Uhlmann, D.R., Introduction to Ceramics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976), p. 99.Google Scholar
17.Schmalzried, H., Solid State Reactions (Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany, 1981), p. 105.Google Scholar
18.Rossetti, G.A. Jr.Cline, J.P., and A. Navrotsky, J. Mater. Res. 13, 3197 (1998).Google Scholar