Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:42:24.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hardness measurements of Ar+-beam treated polyimide by depth-sensing ultra low load indentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

E.H. Lee
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Y. Lee
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
W.C. Oliver
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
L.K. Mansur
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Get access

Abstract

Polyimide Kapton and spin-cast polyamic acid (PAA) on sapphire have been implanted with 1 MeV Ar ions to a dose of 4.7 × 1015 cm−2 at ambient temperature. The properties of both pristine and implanted surfaces were characterized by a depth-sensing low-load indentation technique. Experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of substrate, indentation rate, relaxation, and indentation technique. The results showed that (1) hardness was depth-dependent and decreased with increasing indentation depth, (2) measurements of the ion beam hardened surface with the untreated material as a substrate underestimated the hardness while measurements over the sapphire substrate overestimated it, (3) the effects of loading/unloading rates were apparent in the load displacement results, and (4) hardness values measured using the force modulation technique showed very little depth dependence. The hardness value at 100 nm depth is used for comparison purposes since the hardness value at this depth was almost independent of substrate, indentation rate, and indentation method. The hardness of Kapton, which was measured using the techniques described herein, was increased by over 30 times after Ar implantation, from 0.43 to 13 GPa at 100 nm indentation depth. A similar increase in hardness was also observed for polyamic acid. This result suggests that spin-cast PAA film may have potential technological applications for protective coatings where hardness and wear resistance are required.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Lee, E.H.Lewis, MB., Blau, P.J. and Mansur, L.K.J. Mater. Res. 6, 610 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Handbook of Plastics Test Methods, edited by Brown, Roger P. (Longman Scientific & Technical, Copublished with John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1988), 3rd ed., Chap. 8, p. 107.Google Scholar
3Bhattacharya, A.K. and Nix, W.D.Int. J. Solids Structures 24 (12), 1287 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Lee, Y.Lee, E. H. and Mansur, L. K.J. Surf. Coating Technol. 51, 267 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Lee, E. H.Rao, G. R. and Mansur, L. K.J. Mater. Res. 7, 1900 (1992).Google Scholar
6Lewis, M.B.Allen, W.R.Buhl, R.A.Packan, N.H.Cook, S.W. and Mansur, L. K.Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B 43, 234 (1989).Google Scholar
7Oliver, W. C.Mater. Res. Bull. XI, 15 (1986).Google Scholar
8Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M.J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Oliver, W.C. and Pethica, J.B. U.S. Patent No. 4545141, July 1989.Google Scholar
10McHargue, C. J. to be published in Proc. NATO-ASI Diamond and Diamond-Like Films, Italy, 1990.Google Scholar
11Duroux, J. L. and Moliton, A.Nucl. Instrum Methods in Phys. Res. B 34, 450 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D.J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).Google Scholar
13Pethica, J.B.Hutchings, R. and Oliver, W.C.Philos. Mag. A 48 (4), 593 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Rao, G. R.Wang, Z. L. and Lee, E. H. submitted to J. Mater. Res.Google Scholar