Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:45:33.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further analysis of the size effect in indentation hardness tests of some metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

M. Atkinson
M. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Golden Gully Road, Jamberoo, New South Wales 2533, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The variation of apparent hardness observed in previously reported Vickers indentation tests of metals is reexamined. Common deseriptions of the effect are shown to be inaccurate: the variation of apparent hardness is monotonic but not simple. The effect is consistent with varying size of a previously postulated “plastic hinge” at the perimeter of the indent. This complexity confers uncertainty on the estimation of characteristic macrohardness from small scale tests. Association of the indentation size effect with friction and with strain hardening is confirmed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 10 , Issue 11 , November 1995 , pp. 2908 - 2915
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Mott, B.W., Micro-indentation Hardness Testing (Butterworths, London, 1956).Google Scholar
2Buckle, H., Metall. Rev. 4, 49 (1959).Google Scholar
3Yoshino, T., Bull. Jpn. S.M.E. 8, 291 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Discussion to Ref. 10: J. Testing and Evaluation 20, 475–476 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Bell, T.J., Field, J. S., and Swain, M.V., Mater. Forum 17, 127 (1993).Google Scholar
7Gane, N. and Cox, J.M., Philos. Mag. 19, 881 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Tate, D., Trans. Am. Soc. Met. 35, 374 (1945).Google Scholar
9Bernhardt, E.O., Z. Metallk. 33, 135 (1941).Google Scholar
10Froehlich, F., Grau, P., and Grellmann, W., Phys. Status Solidi A 42, 79 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Frischat, G.H., in Strength of Inorganic Glasses (Plenum Press, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
12Atkinson, M., J. Testing and Evaluation 19, 368 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Atkinson, M., Mater. Sci. Eng. A (1995, in press).Google Scholar
14Atkinson, M. and Shi, H., Mater. Sci. Technol. 5, 613 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Shi, H and Atkinson, M., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 2111 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Atkinson, M., Int. J. Mech. Sci. 33, 843 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Samuels, L. E., in Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering, ASTM STP 889, edited by Blau, and Lawn, (1986), pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
18Mason, W., Johnson, P.F., and Varner, J.R., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 6576 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Atkinson, M., J. Mater. Sci. 30, 1728 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar