Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:37:20.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental observations of deformation behavior of bulk metallic glasses during wedge-like cylindrical indentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Antonia Antoniou ,
Ashraf Bastawros  and
Bulent Biner
Antonia Antoniou
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-2271
Ashraf Bastawros*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-2271
Bulent Biner
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-2271
*
a) Address correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article reports on the in situ observations of deformation behavior of a metallic glass under a wedge-like cylindrical indenter. The experimental observations for various indenter radii provide information on both macroscopic and microscopic details of the deformation. The deformation zones developed under indenters with different radii that were found to be self-similar and in agreement with the predictions of continuum finite-element simulation with pressure-dependent yielding. There are two types of shear bands being identified beneath the indenter. A set of primary bands is identified as evolving with the process zone front and presents an included angle of 78–80°. The other set of bands evolves at a later stage of loading within the originally formed ones but with a consistently higher included angle of around 87°. Despite the richness of the shear-band details, the macroscopic trends, the force-indentation depth response, and the extent of deformation zones are well captured for this constrained deformation mode by the continuum models that address the onset of yielding only.

Keywords

AmorphousHardnessStress/strain relationship
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , September 2006 , pp. 514 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Bruck, H.A., Christman, T., Rosakis, A.J., and Johnson, W.L.: Quasi-static constitutive behavior of Zr41.25Ti13.75Ni10 Cu12.5Be22.5 bulk amorphous alloys. Scripta Metall. Mater. 30, 429 (1994).Google Scholar
2Leamy, H.J., Chen, H.S., and Wang, T.T.: Plastic flow and fracture of metallic glass. Metall. Trans. 3, 699 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Zhang, Z.F., Eckert, J., and Schultz, L.: Difference in compressive and tensile fracture mechanisms of Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3 bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 51, 1167 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Donovan, P.E.: Plastic flow and fracture of Pd40Ni40P20 metallic glass under an indentor. J. Mater. Sci. 24, 523 (1989).Google Scholar
5Kim, J-J., Choi, Y., Suresh, S., and Argon, A.S.: Nanocrystallization during nanoindentation of a bulk amorphous metal alloy at room temperature. Science 295, 654 (2002).Google Scholar
6Vaidyanathan, R., Dao, M., Ravichandran, G., and Suresh, S.: Study of mechanical deformation in bulk metallic glass through instrumented indentation. Acta Mater. 49, 3781 (2001).Google Scholar
7Patnaik, M.N.M., Narasimhan, R., and Ramamurty, U.: Spherical indentation response of metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 52, 3335 (2004).Google Scholar
8Antoniou, A., Bastawros, A.F., Lo, C.C.H., and Biner, S.B.: Deformation behavior of a zirconium based metallic glass during cylindrical indentation: In situ observations. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 394, 96 (2005).Google Scholar
9Conner, R.D., Li, Y., Nix, W.D., and Johnson, W.L.: Shear band spacing under bending of Zr-based metallic glass plates. Acta Mater. 52, 2429 (2004).Google Scholar
10Leng, Y. and Courtney, T.H.: Multiple shear band formation in metallic glasses in composites. J. Mater. Sci. 26, 588 (1991).Google Scholar
11Choi-Yim, H., Busch, R., Koster, U., and Johnson, W.L.: Synthesis and characterization of particulate reinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 bulk metallic glass composite. Acta Mater. 47, 2455 (1999).Google Scholar
12Szuecs, F., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L.: Mechanical properties of Zr56.2Ti13.8Nb5.0Cu6.9 Ni5.6Be12.5 ductile phase reinforced bulk metallic glass composite. Acta Mater. 49, 1507 (2001).Google Scholar
13Biner, S.B.: Ductility of bulk metallic glasses and their composites with ductile reinforcements: A numerical study. Acta Mater. 54, 139 (2006).Google Scholar
14Donovan, P.E.: Yield criterion for Pd40Ni40P20 metallic glass. Acta Metall. 37, 445 (1989).Google Scholar
15Lewandowski, J.J. and Lowhaphandu, P.: Effects of hydrostatic pressure on the flow and fracture of a bulk amorphous metal. Philos. Mag. A. 82, 3427 (2002).Google Scholar
16Zhang, Z.F., Eckert, J., and Schultz, L.: Fatigue and fracture behavior of bulk metallic glass. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35, 3489 (2003).Google Scholar
17Schuh, C.A. and Lund, A.C.: Atomistic basis for the plastic yield criterion of metallic glass. Nat. Mater. 2, 449 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Jana, S., Ramamurty, U., Chattopadhyay, K., and Kawamura, Y.: Subsurface deformation during Vickers indentation of bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 375–377, 1191 (2004).Google Scholar
19Narasimhan, R.: Analysis of indentation of pressure sensitive plastic solids using the expanding cavity model. Mech. Mater. 36, 633 (2004).Google Scholar
20Vaks, V.G.: Possible mechanism for formation of localized shear bands in amorphous alloys. Phys. Lett. A 159, 174 (1991).Google Scholar
21Huang, R., Suo, Z., Prevost, J.H., and Nix, W.D.: Inhomogeneous deformation in metallic glasses. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 50, 1011 (2002).Google Scholar
22Krammer, M.J., Biner, B., and Sordelet, D.J.: Formation of free volume during mechanical deformation. JOM 56(11), 156 (2004).Google Scholar
23Anand, L. and Su, C.: A theory for amorphous viscoplastic materials undergoing finite deformations, with application to metallic glasses. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 53, 1362 (2005).Google Scholar
24Yang, Q., Mota, A., and Ortiz, M.: A finite-deformation constitutive model of bulk metallic glass plasticity. Comput. Mech. 37(2), 194 (2006).Google Scholar
25Argon, A.S.: Plastic deformation in metallic glasses. Acta Metall. 27, 47 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Deng, D., Argon, A.S., and Yip, S.: A molecular dynamics model of melting and glass transition in an idealized two-dimensional material: I. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., London, Ser. A 329, 549 (1989).Google Scholar
27Shi, Y. and Falk, M.: Strain localization and percolation of stable structure in amorphous solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 095502 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Shi, Y. and Falk, M.: Does metallic glass have a backbone? The role of percolating short range order in strength and failure. Scripta Mater. 54, 381 (2006).Google Scholar
29Bailey, N.P., Schiotz, J., and Jacobsen, K.W.: Atomistic simulations of Mg–Cu metallic glasses: Mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 387–389, 996 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Su, C. and Anand, L.: Plane strain indentation of a Zr-based metallic glass: Experiments and numerical simulation. Acta Mater. 54, 179 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Shi, Y. and Falk, M.: Structural transformation and localization during simulated nanoindentation of a noncrystalline metal film. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 011914 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Schuh, C.A., Argon, A.S., Nieh, T.G., and Wadsworth, J.: The transition from localized to homogeneous plasticity during nanoindentation of an amorphous metal. Philos. Mag. 83, 2585 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Schuh, C.A. and Nieh, T.G.: A nanoindentation study of serrated flow in bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 1, 87 (2004).Google Scholar
34Kramer, M.J., Sordelet, D.J., Bastawros, A.F., Tan, X., and Biner, S.B.: Absence of crystallization during cylindrical indentation of a Zr-based metallic glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 351, 2159 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Al-Abduljabbar, A. and Pan, J.: Effects of pressure sensitivity and notch geometry on notch tip fields. Polym. Eng. Sci. 38(7), 1031 (1998).Google Scholar
36Jeong, H-Y., Li, X-W., Yee, A.F., and Pan, J.: Slip lines in front of a round notch tip in a pressure sensitive material. Mech. Mater. 19, 29 (1994).Google Scholar
37Johnson, K.L.: The correlation of indentation experiments. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 18, 115 (1970).Google Scholar
38 ABAQUS: General Purpose Finite Element Program, Version 6.4 (Hibbit Karlsson and Sorensen Inc, Pawtucket, RI, 2003).Google Scholar
39Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
40Bastawros, A-F. and Kim, K-S.: Experimental analysis of near-crack-tip plastic flow and deformation characteristics (I): Polycrystalline aluminum. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48, 67 (2000).Google Scholar
41Kachanov, L.M.: Foundations of the Theory of Plasticity (North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1971), p. 166.Google Scholar
42Spaepen, F.: Microscopic mechanism for steady state inhomogeneous flow in metallic glasses. Acta Metall. 25, 407 (1977).Google Scholar
43Li, J., Spaepen, F., and Hufnagel, T.C.: Nanometre-scale defects in shear bands in a metallic glass. Philos. Mag. A 13, 2623 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Rudnicki, J.W. and Rice, J.R.: Conditions for the localization of deformation in pressure sensitive dilatant materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 23, 371 (1974).Google Scholar