Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:37:21.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carbon fiber-reinforced tin-lead alloy composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

C.T. Ho
C.T. Ho
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Yun-Lin Polytechnic Institute of Technology, Yun-Lin, Taiwan, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

Brominated, anodically oxidized, and pristine p-100 carbon fiber reinforced tin-lead alloy composites were fabricated by squeeze casting. The fibers were brominated by bromine vapor for 48 h and then desorbed at 200 °C in air for 12 h. The anodic oxidation treatment of fibers involved electrochemical etching in a dilute sodium hydroxide electrolyte for 3 min, or immersing in nitric acid for 72 h. The composites containing surface-treated carbon fibers had higher tensile and interlaminar shear strength than the ones containing pristine carbon fibers. The composite containing brominated carbon fibers had better tensile strength than the other two surface treatments.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 9 , Issue 8 , August 1994 , pp. 2144 - 2147
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Old, C. F., Barwood, I., and Nicholas, M. G., Pract. Met. Compos., Spring Met., B47–B50, London, England, Inst. Metall. (1974).Google Scholar
2Ho, C. T. and Chung, D.D.L., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1266 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Miyase, A. and Piekarski, K., Adv. Res. Strength Fract. Mater., 4th Int. Conf. Fract., 1977, edited by Taplin, D.M.R. (Pergamon, Elmsford, NY, 1978), Vol. 3b, pp. 1067–1074.Google Scholar
4Gelderloos, D. G. and Karasek, K. R., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 3, 232 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Leis, H. O. and Peters, P.W.M., Proceeding ICCM-MIII, 1108 (1980).Google Scholar
6Paiand, B. C., Rohatgi, P. K., Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 161 (1975).Google Scholar
7Chengfu, W., Meifang, Y., and Duofeng, Y., Proceeding ICCM-VI 2, 183 (1987).Google Scholar
8Gaier, J. R., NASA Technical Memorandum 101394 (1988).Google Scholar
9Donnet, J. B. and Bansal, R. C., Carbon Fibers (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
10Fitzer, E., Carbon Fibers and Their Composites (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Donnel, J. B. and Bahl, O. P., “Carbon Fibers,” in Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1986).Google Scholar
12Jaworske, D. A., Gaier, J. R., Hung, C. C., and Banks, B. A., SAMPLE Quarterly 18, 9 (1986).Google Scholar
13Chung, D. D. L., Li, P. T., and Li, X. M., Ext. Abstr. Program-Bienn. Conf. Carbon 18, 330 (1987).Google Scholar
14In Plane Shear Strength of Reinforced Plastics, ASTM Standard D3846–79 (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA).Google Scholar
15Zywicz, E. and Parks, D. M., Compos. Sci. Technol. 33, 295 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Ho, C. T., Liu, W. L., and Lin, C. K., Ext. Abstr. Program-Bienn. Conf. Carbon 21, 78 (1993).Google Scholar