Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:23:29.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interfacial Bonding Behavior with Introduction of Sn–Zn–Bi Paste to Sn–Ag–Cu Ball Grid Array Package During Multiple Reflows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Po-Cheng Shih  and
Kwang-Lung Lin
Po-Cheng Shih
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, Republic of China
Kwang-Lung Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

Sn–8Zn–3Bi solder paste and Sn–3.2Ag–0.5Cu solder balls were reflowed simultaneously on Cu/Ni/Au metallized ball grid array (BGA) substrates to investigate the interfacial bonding behaviors for multiple reflow cycles at two different soldering temperature of 210 and 240 °C. The different intermetallic compounds that formed at the interface after one reflow cycle were respectively the island-shaped Ag–Au-Cu-Zn (near the solder) compounds and the Ni–Sn–Cu-Zn (near the metallized pad) compounds in 210 or 240 °C soldering systems. Layered Ag–Au–Cu–Zn, Ag5Zn8, and Ag–Zn–Sn compounds were also observed within the solder near the interface after single reflow cycle. After ten reflow cycles, the Ag–Au–Cu–Zn compounds significantly decomposed, while the Ag3Sn and Ni–Sn–Cu–Zn compounds coarsened obviously.

Keywords

BondingPastePackaging
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 219 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Amagai, M., Watanabe, M., Omiya, M., Kishimoto, K. and Shibuya, T.: Mechanical characterization of Sn–Ag–based lead-free solders. Microelectron. Reliab. 42, 951 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Hirose, A., Fujii, T., Imamura, T. and Kobayashi, K.F.: Influence of interfacial reaction on reliability of QFP joints with Sn–Ag based Pb free solders. Mater. Trans. 42, 794 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Miyazawa, Y. and Ariga, T.: Influences of aging treatment on microstructure and hardness of Sn–(Ag, Bi, Zn) eutectic solder alloys. Mater. Trans. 42, 776 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Chonan, Y., Komiyama, T., Onuki, J., Urao, R., Kimura, T. and Nagano, T.: Influence of P content in electroless plated Ni-P alloy film on interfacial structures and strength between Sn–Zn solder and plated Au/Ni-P alloy film. Mater. Trans. 43, 1887 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Chuang, C.M., Shih, P.C. and Lin, K.L.: Mechanical strength of Sn–3.5Ag–based solders and related bondings. J. Electron. Mater. 33, 1 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Kang, S.K., Choi, W.K., Shih, D.Y., Lauro, P., Henderson, D.W., Gosselin, T., and Leonard, D.N.: Interfacial reactions, microstructure and mechanical properties of Pb-free solder joints in PBGA Laminates, in Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc, San Diego, CA, 2002 Proceedings 52nd, 28-31 May 2002, pp. 146–153.Google Scholar
7Lee, C.B., Jung, S.B., Shin, Y.E. and Shur, C.C.: Effect of isothermal aging on ball shear strength in BGA joints with Sn–3.5Ag–0.75Cu solder. Mater. Trans. 43, 1858 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Yu, S.P., Lin, H.J., Hon, M.H. and Wang, M.C.: Effects of process parameters on the soldering behavior of the eutectic Sn–Zn solder on Cu substrate. J. Mater. Sci.–Mater. Electron. 11, 461 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Suganuma, K., Niihara, K., Shoutoku, T. and Nakamura, Y.: Wetting and interface microstructure between Sn–Zn alloys and Cu. J. Mater. Res. 13, 2859 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Taguchi, T., Kato, R., Okuno, A., Suzuki, H., Okuno, T., and Akita, S.: Lead free interfacial structures and their relationship to Au plating (including accelerated thermal cycle testing of non-leaden BGA spheres), in Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc, Orlando, FL, 2001 Proceedings, 51st, 29th May-1st June 2001, Orlando, FL, pp. 675–680.Google Scholar
11Kim, Y.S., Kim, K.S., Hwang, C.W. and Suganuma, K.: Effect of composition and cooling rate on microstructure and tensile properties of Sn–Zn–Bi alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 352, 237 (2003).Google Scholar
12Shohji, I., Nakamura, T., Mori, F. and Fujiuchi, S.: Interface reaction and mechanical properties of lead-free Sn–Zn alloy/Cu joints. Mater. Trans. 43, 1797 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Lee, H.M., Yoon, S.W. and Lee, B.J.: Thermodynamic prediction of interface phases at Cu/solder joints. J. Electron. Mater. 27, 1161 (1998).Google Scholar
14Yoon, S.W., Choi, W.K. and Lee, H.M.: Interfacial reaction between Sn–1Bi-5In-9Zn solder and Cu substrate. Scripta Mater. 40, 327 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Massalski, T.B.: Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986), Vol. 1, pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
16Massalski, T.B.: Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986), Vol. 1, pp.85–86.Google Scholar
17Massalski, T.B.: Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986), Vol. 1, pp. 337–338.Google Scholar
18Massalski, T.B.: Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986), Vol. 1, pp. 980–981.Google Scholar
19Massalski, T.B.: Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986), Vol. 1, pp. 253–254.Google Scholar
20Massalski, T.B.: Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986), Vol. 1, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
21Zhang, F., Li, M., Chum, C.C. and Shao, Z.C.: Effects of substrate metallization on solder/under-bump metallization interfacial reactions in flip-chip packages during multiple reflow cycles. J. Electron. Mater. 32, 123 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Zeng, K. and Tu, K.N.: Six cases of reliability study of Pb-free solder joints in electronic packaging technology. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 38, 55 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Ho, C.E., Tsai, R.Y., Lin, Y.L. and Kao, C.R.: Effect of Cu concentration on the reactions between Sn–Ag–Cu solders and Ni. J. Electron. Mater. 31, 584 (2002).Google Scholar
24Jeon, Y.D., Nieland, S., Ostmann, A., Reichl, H., and Paik, K.W.: Studies on the interfacial reactions between electroless Ni UBM and 95.5Sn–4.0Ag–0.5Cu alloy, in Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc, San Diego, CA, 2002 Proceedings 52nd, 28-31 May 2002, pp. 740–746.Google Scholar
25Zribi, A., Clark, A., Zavalij, L., Borgesen, P. and Cotts, E.J.: The growth of intermetallics compounds at Sn–Ag–Cu solder/Cu and Sn–Ag–Cu solder/Ni interfaces and the associated evolution of the solder microstructure. J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1157 (2001).Google Scholar
26Zheng, Y., Hillman, C., and McCluskey, P.: Intermetallic growth on PWBs soldered with Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu, in Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., San Diego, CA, 2002 Proceedings 52nd, 28-31 May 2002, pp. 1226–1231.Google Scholar
27Kim, K.S., Huh, S.H. and Suganuma, K.: Effects of fourth alloying additive on microstructures and tensile properties of Sn–Ag–Cu alloy and joints with Cu. Microelectron. Reliab. 43, 259 (2003).Google Scholar
28Yu, S.P., Wang, M.C. and Hon, M.H.: Formation of intermetallic compounds at eutectic Sn–Zn–Al solder/Cu interface. J. Mater. Res. 16, 76 (2001).Google Scholar
29Paik, K.W., Jeon, Y.D., and Cho, M.G.: Interfacial reactions and bump reliability of various Pb-free solder bumps on electroless Ni-P UBMs, in Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc, Las Vegas, NV, 2004 Proceedings 54th, pp. 675–682.Google Scholar