Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:51:45.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dissociative adsorption of hydrogen sulfide over nanophase titanium dioxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Donald D. Beck  and
Richard W. Siegel
Donald D. Beck
Affiliation:
Physical Chemistry Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan 48090-9055
Richard W. Siegel
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439-4815
Get access

Abstract

A variety of TiO2 materials, including a nanophase TiO2 powder, were evaluated for their ability to dissociatively adsorb H2S in a H2 environment. A temperature programmed desorption technique was used to determine the rate of sulfide accumulation on the surface of the samples as a measurement of initial activity. The initial activity for the gas condensation-produced nanophase TiO2 with its rutile structure was found to be greater than that for other samples of TiO2 tested. When normalized for surface area, the initial specific activities of the rutile samples studied for the dissociative adsorption of H2S were similar in magnitude, but significantly higher than those of the anatase TiO2 samples investigated. Thus, the improvement in the activity is attributed mainly to the ability of the nanophase synthesis method to produce high surface area rutile TiO2. When evaluated using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, the nanophase TiO2 was found to be significantly deficient in oxygen. Annealing this material in oxygen decreased the number of anion vacancies and lowered the activity. Thus, we conclude that oxygen vacancies also contribute to the H2S dissociative adsorption activity.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 10 , October 1992 , pp. 2840 - 2845
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Birringer, R., Herr, U., and Gleiter, H., Suppl. Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 27, 43 (1986).Google Scholar
2Siegel, R. W. and Hahn, H., in Current Trends in the Physics of Materials, edited by Yussouff, M. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987), p. 403.Google Scholar
3Siegel, R. W., Ramasamy, S., Hahn, H., Zongquan, L., Ting, L., and Gronsky, R., J. Mater. Res. 3, 1367 (1988).Google Scholar
4Andres, R.P., Averback, R.S., Brown, W.L., Brus, L.E., Goddard, W.A. III, Kaldor, A., Louie, S. G., Moscovits, M., Peercy, P. S., Riley, S. J., Siegel, R.W., Spaepen, F., and Wang, Y., J. Mater. Res. 4, 704 (1989); H. Gleiter, Prog. Mater. Sci. 33, 223 (1989); R.W. Siegel, in Materials Science and Technology, edited by R.W. Cahn (VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany, 1991), p. 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Melendres, C.A., Narayanasamy, A., Maroni, V.A., and Siegel, R.W., J. Mater. Res. 4, 1246 (1989).Google Scholar
6Mayo, M. J., Siegel, R. W., Narayanasamy, A., and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1073 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Parker, J. C. and Siegel, R. W., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1246 (1990); J. C. Parker and R.W. Siegel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 943 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Matsuda, S. and Kato, A., Appl. Catal. 8, 149 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Beck, D.D., White, J.M., and Ratcliffe, C.T., J. Phys. Chem. 90, 3123 (1986).Google Scholar
10Pearson, M.J., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 16, 154 (1977).Google Scholar
11George, Z.M., Phosphorus Sulfur 1, 315 (1976).Google Scholar
12Harkonen, M.A., Salanne, S., Rantakyla, T-K., and Pohjola, V.J., Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper No. 900498, 1990.Google Scholar
13Gottberg, I., Hogberg, E., and Weber, K., Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper No. 890491, 1989.Google Scholar
14Henk, M. G., White, J. J., and Denison, G. W., Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper No. 872134, 1987.Google Scholar
15Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E., X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline andAmorphous Materials (John Wiley, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
16Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., and Teller, E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 309 (1938).Google Scholar
17Beck, D.D., Krueger, M.H., and Monroe, D.R., Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper No. 910844, 1991.Google Scholar
18“Standard Test Method for Determination of Carbon, Sulfur, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Hydrogen in Steel, and in Iron, Nickel, and Cobalt Alloys”, Annual Book of ASTM Standards (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1989), Vol. 03.05, p. 706.Google Scholar
19Wagner, C.D. and Taylor, J.A., J. Electron Spectrosc. 20, 83 (1980).Google Scholar
20Parfltt, G. D., Prog. Surf. Membr. Sci. 11, 181 (1976).Google Scholar
21Smith, K.E. and Henrich, V.E., Surf. Sci. 217, 445 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Deane, A.M., Griffiths, D.L., Lewis, L.A., Winter, J.A., and Tench, A.J., J. Chem. Soc, Faraday Trans. 1, 71, 1005 (1975).Google Scholar
23Slager, T. and Amberg, C., Can. J. Chem. 50, 3416 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Smith, K. E., Mackay, J. L., and Henrich, V. E., Phys. Rev. B 35, 5822 (1987).Google Scholar
25Matsuda, S., Kamo, T., Imahashi, J., and Nakajima, F., Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 21, 18 (1982).Google Scholar