Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:52:52.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constrained-film sintering of a gold circuit paste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

JoonWon Choe ,
Jesus Noel Calat  and
Guo-Quan Lu
JoonWon Choe
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0237
Jesus Noel Calat
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0237
Guo-Quan Lu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0237
Get access

Abstract

We studied the constrained-film sintering of a gold circuit paste used in microelectronic packaging applications. Optical techniques were developed to determine the shrinkage profiles of constrained and free films and stresses generated during sintering in the constrained films. Constrained films approximately 60 μm thick were made by multiple screen-printing of the gold paste on rigid alumina substrates, while the free films were obtained by peeling off portions of the gold films from the substrate after binder burnout. Constrained films for stress measurement were made by multiple screen-printing on an oxidized 25 μm thick silicon substrate. Sintering runs were done in a hot stage at temperatures between 650 °C and 900 °C. The densification rates were much lower in the constrained films than those in the free films. The in-plane tensile stresses in the constrained films, determined by wafer curvature measurement, rose rapidly to a maximum level of 510 kPa during the initial stage of sintering and then gradually decreased. The reduction in the sintering potential due to the hydrostatic stress is not large enough to completely account for the retarded densification in constrained films. SEM micrographs of the film microstructures after sintering showed no-significant difference in grain growth kinetics between the constrained and free films. However, the activation energy for densification was found to be very different between the two types of films, 90.1 ± 4.3 kJ/mole for the free film and 188.8 ± 6.7 kJ/mole for the constrained film. We suggest that the retarded densification kinetics in the constrained gold films is due to (i) the reduction in the sintering potential by the hydrostatic stress and (ii) a change in the dominant sintering mechanism from grain-boundary diffusion in the free films to lattice diffusion in the constrained films.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , April 1995 , pp. 986 - 994
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Holmes, P. J. and Loasby, R. G., Handbook of Thick Film Technology (Electrochemical Publications Limited, Ayr, Scotland, 1976).Google Scholar
2Tummala, R. R., in Microelectronics Packaging Handbook, edited by Tummala, R. R. and Rymaszewski, E. J. (Van Nostrand Rein-hold, New York, 1989), Chap. 7.Google Scholar
3Lu, G-Q., Sutterlin, R. C., and Gupta, T. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76(8), 1907–1914 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Sutterlin, R. C., Lu, G-Q., and Gupta, T.K., Ceram. Trans. 33, 435–444 (1993).Google Scholar
5Scherer, G. W. and Garino, T. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68 (4), 216–220 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Bordia, R. K. and Raj, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68 (6), 287–292 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hsueh, C. H., Scripta Metall. 19, 1213–1217 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Garino, T. J. and Bowen, H. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (2), 251–257 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Ohring, M., The Material Science of Thin Films (Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1992), pp. 416–418.Google Scholar
10Porter, D. A. and Easterling, K. E., Phase Transformation in Metalsand Alloys (Van Nostrand Reinhold, Berkshire, England, 1981), p. 113.Google Scholar
11Scherer, G. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70 (10), 719–725 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Raj, R. and Bordia, R. K., Acta Metall. 32 (7), 1003–1019 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Hsueh, C. H., Evans, A. G., Cannon, R. M., and Brook, R.J., Acta Metall. 34 (5), 927 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Bordia, R. K. and Scherer, G. W., Ceram. Trans. 1, 872–886 (1988).Google Scholar
15Bordia, R. K. and Scherer, G. W., Acta Metall. 69 (6), 2399–2 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Cheng, T., Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (1989).Google Scholar
17Venkatachari, K. R. and Raj, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69 (6), 499–2 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Brandes, E. A., Smithells Metals Reference Book, 6th ed. (Butter worth & Co., Ltd., Washington, DC, 1983).Google Scholar