Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:33:52.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Martin Krämer, Underlying representations (Key Topics in Phonology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Pp. x+266.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2013

Stig Eliasson
Stig Eliasson*
Affiliation:
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
*
Author's address: Department of English and Linguistics, Program of Northern European and Baltic Languages and Cultures, FB 05, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Jakob-Welder-Weg 18, D-55099 Mainz, Germany[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , July 2013 , pp. 489 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arbib, Michael A. 2012. How the brain got language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, José I.. 2011. Underlying representations. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. I: General issues and segmental phonology (Blackwell Companions to Linguistics Series), 1–26. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eliasson, Stig. 1997. The cognitive calculus and its function in language. In Gvozdanović, Jadranka (ed.), Language change and functional explanations (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 98), 53–70. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iosad, Pavel. 2012. Representation and variation in substance-free phonology: A case study in Celtic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø, Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Linguistics. http://hdl.handle.net/10037/4794.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2005. Taking a free ride in morphophonemic learning. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4, 19–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan. 2002. Arguing optimality. 33 pp. ROA (Rutgers Optimality Archive) 562. http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Ladusaw, William A.. 1986. Phonetic symbol guide. Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1960. Cours de linguistique générale, 5th edn. (Bibliothèque Scientifique). Paris: Payot. [1st edn. 1916]Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. 1996. A dictionary of phonetics and phonology. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar