No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax. (Topics in English Linguistics, 2.) Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. Pp. viii + 510.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Shorter Notices
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
REFERENCES
Anderson, John (1990). On the status of auxiliaries in notional grammar. JL 26. 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breivik, Leiv Egil (1983). Existential ‘there’: a synchronic and diachronic study (Studia Anglistica Norvegica 2). Department of English, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Muysken, Pieter (1986). The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners – a study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research 2. 93–119.Google Scholar
Rydén, Mats & Brorström, Sverker (1987). The ‘be/have’ variation with intransitives in English: with special reference to the Late Modern period (Stockholm Studies in English, 70). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Stein, Dieter (1990). The semantics of syntactic change: aspects of the evolution of ‘do’ in English (Trends in Linguistics/Studies and Monographs, 47). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne & Young-Scholten, Martha (1991). Verb raising in second language acquisition: the early stages. In Universal grammar in second language acquisition (Theorie des Lexikons, 4; Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs, 282). The LEXLERN Project, Seminar für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Düsseldorf. 1–47.Google Scholar