Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:16:38.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form–frequency correspondence explanation – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2014

MARTIN HASPELMATH ,
ANDREEA CALUDE ,
MICHAEL SPAGNOL ,
HEIKO NARROG  and
ELI˙F BAMYACI
MARTIN HASPELMATH
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
ANDREEA CALUDE
Affiliation:
University of Waikato
MICHAEL SPAGNOL
Affiliation:
University of Malta
HEIKO NARROG
Affiliation:
Tohoku University
ELI˙F BAMYACI
Affiliation:
University of Würzburg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , November 2014 , pp. 779
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

The penultimate sentence of the abstract of the article by Haspelmath et al. (Reference Haspelmath, Calude, Spagnol, Narrog and Bamyacı2014), ‘In corpus data from seven languages, we find that verb pairs for which the noncausal member is more frequent tend to be coded as anticausatives, while verb pairs for which the causal member is more frequent tend to be coded as causatives’, should read:

In corpus data from seven languages, we find that verb pairs for which the causal member is more frequent tend to be coded as anticausatives, while verb pairs for which the noncausal member is more frequent tend to be coded as causatives.

References

REFERENCE

Haspelmath, Martin, Calude, Andreea, Spagnol, Michael, Narrog, Heiko & Bamyacı, Elif. 2014. Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form–frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50.3, 587–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar