Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:01:09.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

William A. Foley & Robert D. Van ValinJr, Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Pp. xii + 416.

Review products

William A. Foley & Robert D. Van ValinJr, Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Pp. xii + 416.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

A. Machtelt Bolkestein
A. Machtelt Bolkestein
Affiliation:
Department of Latin, University of Amsterdam.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 1986 , pp. 216 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dik, S. C. (1980). Studies in functional grammar. London/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dik, S. C. (1985). Formal and semantic adjustment of derived constructions. In Bolkestein, A. M., de Groot, C. & Mackenzie, J. L. (eds.). Predicates and terms in functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. 1–28.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax. A functional-typological introduction. Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (ed.) (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J. & Munro, P. (eds.) (1983). Switch reference and universal grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Lg 56. 251–299.Google Scholar
Mallinson, G. & Blake, B. J. (1981). Language typology. Amsterdam New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (ed.) (1984). Objects. London/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1980). Of nominatives and datives: universal grammar from the bottom up. Unpubl. ms., University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar