Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:40:32.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on auxiliary verbs and language acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

James D. McCawley
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago1010 E. sgth Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637,USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lightfoot, D. (1989). Matching parameters to simple triggers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12. 364–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1991). Review of McCawley 19887. JL 27. 267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1982). The nonexistence of syntactic categories. In McCawley, J. D., Thirty million theories of grammar. London: Croom Helm & Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1983). Towards plausibility in theories of language acquisition. Communication and Cognition. 169–83.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1988). The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1989). INFL′, Spec, and other fabulous beasts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12. 350–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1991). ‘Negative evidence’ and the gratuitous leap from principles to parameters. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15. 627–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1966). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds.) The genesis of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1584.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1979). On the relationship between children's mastery of Piagetian cognitive operations and their semantic competence. In Rommetveit, R. & Blakar, R. M., Studies of language, thought and verbal communication. London & New York: Academic Press. 457–66.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1969). Auxiliaries as main verbs. Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 1. 77102.Google Scholar
Schachter, P. (1983). Explaining auxiliary order. In Heny, F. & Richards, B. (eds.) Linguistic categories, vol. 11. Dordrecht: Reidel. 145204.Google Scholar