Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T20:30:24.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

K. Safir, Syntactic chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Pp. 409.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Alessandra Giorgi
Alessandra Giorgi
Affiliation:
IRST, Povo, Trento
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , September 1988 , pp. 536 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brandi, L. & Cordin, P. (1981). Dialetti e italiano: un confronto sul parametro del soggetto nullo. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 6.Google Scholar
Brandi, L. & Cordin, P. (1986). From two Italian dialects to Null Subject Parameter: null subject, subject clitics and inversion. Ms., SNS Pisa & University of Trento.Google Scholar
Brody, M. (1984). On contextual definitions and the role of Chains. LIn 15. 355–380.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. Praeger: New York.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1980). Pronouns. LIn 11. 337–362.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J. (1983). Logical Form, Binding and nominais. LIn 14. 337–362.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. (1976). Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2. 1–23.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 6. 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1984). On the status of subject clitics in Romance. Ms.: MIT.Google Scholar