Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:51:03.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt (eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural languages. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979. Pp. 378.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ruth Kempson
Affiliation:
Department of LinguisticsSOAS, London

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, E. & Partee, B. H. (1980). ‘Anaphora and semantic structure’. In Kreiman, J. & Ojeda, A. (eds.), Papers from the para-session on pronouns and anaphora. Chicago Linguistics Society. 128.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1980). Pronouns. LIn II. 337–62.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. & Sag, I. (1980). Passive and reflexive in phrase structure grammar. In Groenedijk, J., Janssen, T. & Stokhof, M. (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hausser, R. (1979). How do pronouns denote? In Heny, F. & Schnelle, H. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 10, 93142.Google Scholar
Kempson, R. & Cormack, A. (1981). Ambiguity and quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, H. (1976). Remarks on Coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2, 122.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1977). ‘The logic of demonstratives’ (mimeo).Google Scholar
Thomason, R. (ed.) (1974). Formal philosophy: selected papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press.Google Scholar