Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:01:19.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Esa Itkonen, Causality in linguistic theory. London: Croom Helm, 1983. Pp. x + 332.

Review products

Esa Itkonen, Causality in linguistic theory. London: Croom Helm, 1983. Pp. x + 332.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Trevor Pateman
Trevor Pateman
Affiliation:
Education Development Building, University of Sussex.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 481 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, K. & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge University Press. 56–289.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. (1978). Karl Marx's theory of history. A defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. (1982). Functional explanation, consequence explanation, and Marxism. Inquiry 25. 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, J. (1983). Rethinking cognitive theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. (1979). Brainstorms. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N. (1983). Descriptive and explanatory power of rules in sociolinguistics. In Bain, B. (ed.), The sociogenesis of language and human conduct. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Downes, W. (1984). Language and society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1982). Marxism, functionalism and game theory. Theory and Society 11. 453–481.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1983). Explaining technical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1976). The Language of thought. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3, Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 41–58.Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1978). Grammatical theory and metascience. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1984). Concerning the ontological question in linguistics. Language and Communication. 4. 1–6.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1981). Language and other abstract objects. Oxford: Bail Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (1979). Psychological reality in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyas, C. (ed.) (1971). Philosophy and linguistics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pap, A. (1958). Semantics and necessary truth. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, T. (1983). What is a language? Language and Communication 3. 101–127.Google Scholar
Pateman, T. (1985a). Using and defending cognitive theory. In Gilbert, G. N. & Heath, C. (eds), Social action and artificial intelligence. Guildford: Gower Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, T. (1985b). From nativism to sociolinguistics: integrating a theory of language growth with a theory of speech practices. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour XX.Google Scholar
Schank, R. & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. (1983). The prescription is description: Wittgenstein's view of the human sciences. In Mitchell, S. & Rosen, M. (eds), The need for interpretation. London: Athlone Press. 118–140.Google Scholar
Sloman, A. (1978). The computer revolution in philosophy. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (1981). Evolutionary explanation in the social sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar