Tweedy, D., “Medical Schools Have Historically Been Wrong on Race,” The New York Times, July 27, 2020, available at <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/27/opinion/sunday/coronavirus-medicine-blackness.html> (last visited March 22, 2021).Google Scholar

Huerto, R., “Majority Patients Benefit From Having Minority Doctors, But That’s a Hard Match to Make,” University of Michigan Lab Blog, Op-Ed, March 31, 2020, available at <https://labblog.uofmhealth.org/rounds/minority-patientsbenefit- from-having-minority-doctors-but-thats-a-hardmatch-to-make-0> (last visited March 22, 2021) (citing “mounting evidence” that when physicians and patients share the same race it improves the overall care, including medication adherence, cholesterol screening, patient understanding of cancer risks, and perception of treatment options).+(last+visited+March+22,+2021)+(citing+“mounting+evidence”+that+when+physicians+and+patients+share+the+same+race+it+improves+the+overall+care,+including+medication+adherence,+cholesterol+screening,+patient+understanding+of+cancer+risks,+and+perception+of+treatment+options).>Google Scholar

Amicus Brief of the Association of American Medical Colleges, et al., in Support of Respondents at 4, Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 136 S. Ct. 2198 (2016), 2015 WL 6735845 [hereinafter AAMC Amicus Brief] (noting that medical schools rely on “a holistic evaluation process — including personal interviews — in which an applicant’s background is taken into account along with myriad other factors”).Google Scholar

Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 339 (2003).Google Scholar

Id. at 338.Google Scholar

U.S. CONST. amend. XIV, § 1.Google Scholar

Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (Powell, J., plurality opinion).Google Scholar

Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 136 S. Ct. 2198, 2214 (2016) (upholding the constitutionality of the University of Texas’ race-conscious, holistic admissions program); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 325, 343 (2003) (upholding the constitutionality of the University of Michigan Law School’s race-conscious, holistic admissions program).Google Scholar

Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).Google Scholar

Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 136 S. Ct. 2198 (2016); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 343 (2003); Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003).Google Scholar

U.S. CONST. AMEND. XIV, § 1.Google Scholar

See Civil Rights Act of 1866, ch. 31, § 1, Pub. L. No. 39-3, 14 Stat. 27.Google Scholar

McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transp. Co., 427 U.S. 273, 287 (1976) (emphasis omitted) (quoting Senator Trumbull of Ill., CONG. GLOBE, 39TH CONG., 1ST SESS. 211 (1866)).Google Scholar

Civil Rights Act of 1964 § 101, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (2020).Google Scholar

Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 284 (1978) (Powell, J., plurality opinion).Google Scholar

See Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244, 276 n.23 (2003) (citations omitted) (“We have explained that discrimination that violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment committed by an institution that accepts federal funds also constitutes a violation of Title VI.”); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 343 (2003) (concluding that, since the university's admissions program did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, it would not violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). See also Bakke, 438 U.S. at 284-85, 293-94 (Powell, J., plurality opinion) (discussing the history of the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of all persons). See generally , N. Zisk, , “The Future of Race-Conscious Admissions Programs and Why the Law Should Continue to Protect Them,” Northeastern University Law Review 12, no. 1 (2020): 56-98 (examining the history of the Civil Rights from its first enactment to the present).Google Scholar

Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (Powell, J., plurality opinion).Google Scholar

Id. at 317.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id. at 316-318.Google Scholar

Id. at 316-317.Google Scholar

See Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 136 S. Ct. 2198 (2016) (upholding the constitutionality of the University of Texas’ race-conscious, holistic admissions program); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 325, 343 (2003) (upholding the university of Michigan’s law school’s race-conscious admissions program).Google Scholar

Fisher, 136 S. Ct. at 2210; Grutter, 539 U.S. at 328.Google Scholar

Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 312 (1978).Google Scholar

Fisher, 136 S. Ct. at 2210 (internal quotation and alteration omitted).Google Scholar

Id. (internal quotation omitted).Google Scholar

See, e.g., Grutter, 539 U.S. at 343 (noting that “Title VI … proscribe[s] only those racial classifications that would violate the Equal Protection Clause…” (quoting Bakke, 438 U.S. at 287 (Powell, J., plurality opinion)).Google Scholar

Grutter, 539 U.S. at 334 (emphasis added) (quoting Bakke, 438 U.S. at 317 (1978) (Powell, J., plurality opinion)).Google Scholar

See Complaint, Students For Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., 397 F. Supp. 3d 126 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 2019), aff’d, 980 F. 3d 157 (1st Cir. 2020) [hereinafter Harvard Complaint]; Complaint, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Univ. of North Carolina, No. 14-cv-00954 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2014), 2014 WL 6386755 [hereinafter UNC Complaint]. As stated in the plaintiff’s mission statement: “A student’s race and ethnicity should not be factors that either harm or help that student to gain admission to a competitive university.” See STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, available at <https://studentsforfairadmissions.org/about/> (last visited March 22, 2021).+(last+visited+March+22,+2021).>Google Scholar

See Harvard Complaint, supra note 29, ¶ 3; UNC Complaint, supra note 29, ¶ 4.Google Scholar

See UNC Complaint, supra note 29, ¶ 4.Google Scholar

See Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 136 S. Ct. 2198 (2016) (upholding the constitutionality of the University of Texas’ race-conscious, holistic admissions program); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) (upholding the university of Michigan’s law school’s race-conscious admissions program).Google Scholar

Students For Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., 397 F. Supp. 3d 126 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 2019), aff’d, 980 F. 3d 157 (1st Cir. 2020).Google Scholar

Students For Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., 980 F. 3d 157 (1st Cir. 2020).Google Scholar

See K. Murphy, “Trial on UNC-Chapel Hill’s Race-Related Admissions Ends, But Ruling Could Take Months,” The News & Observer, November 19, 2020, available at <https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/education/article247284969.html> (last visited March 22, 2021).+(last+visited+March+22,+2021).>Google Scholar

Complaint, United States v. Yale University, No. 3:20-cv-01534, ¶ 2 (D. Conn. Oct. 8, 2020), available at <https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1326306/download> (last visited March 22, 2021) [hereinafter Yale Complaint].+(last+visited+March+22,+2021)+[hereinafter+Yale+Complaint].>Google Scholar

Id. at ¶ 14.Google Scholar

Salovey, P., “Yale Will Continue to Foster a Diverse and Vibrant Educational Environment,” Office of the President, Yale University, Oct. 8, 2020, available at <https://president.yale. edu/speeches-writings/statements/yale-will-continue-foster-diverse-and-vibrant-educational-environment> (last visited March 22, 2021).Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

Amicus Brief of Brown University, Columbia University, Cornell University, Dartmouth College, Duke University, Emory University, Johns Hopkins University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Stanford University, University of Chicago, University of Pennsylvania, Vanderbilt University, Washington University in St. Louis, and Yale University in Support of Appellee, Students for Fair Admissions,Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., 397 F. Supp. 3d 126 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 2019), aff ’d, 980 F. 3d 157 (1st Cir. 2020) [hereinafter Brown University Amicus Brief]. These universities filed a brief in support of Harvard’s admissions plan, first to the trial court before the case went to trial and to the appellate court, in support of Harvard on appeal. Because of the similarity of the briefs, references will be made to the arguments made in the second brief submitted to the appellate court in this case.Google Scholar

Id. at 1.Google Scholar

Id. at 2.Google Scholar

Id. at 2-3.Google Scholar

Id. at 1.Google Scholar

Id. at 11 (quoting Parents Involved in Cmty. Sch. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 551 U.S. 701, 787 (2007) (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment)). Accord Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 332-33 (2003).Google Scholar

Id. at 11.Google Scholar

Id. at 16.Google Scholar

Id. at 15.Google Scholar

Association of American Medical Colleges, “AAMC Statement on the Department of Justice’s Challenge to Yale’s Admissions Process,” Press Release, Aug. 14, 2020, available at <https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/aamc-statement-department-justice-s-challenge-yale-s-admissions-process> (last visited March 22, 2021).+(last+visited+March+22,+2021).>Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll. (Harvard Corp.), 397 F. Supp. 3d 126, 133 (D. Mass. 2019), aff’d, 980 F. 3d 157 (1st Cir. 2020).Google Scholar

Id. at 200 (quoting Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 136 S. Ct. 2198, 2208 (2016)).Google Scholar

Id. at 192.Google Scholar

Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, No. 1:14-CV-954, 2019 WL 294284, § IID (citing the university expert’s evidence that confirmed that the termination of race-conscious admissions programs would cause a decrease in “academic preparedness and racial diversity”).Google Scholar

Amicus Brief of Brief of the National Association of Basketball Coaches, Women’s Basketball Coaches Association, Auriemma, Geno, Boeheim, James A., Chaney, John, Izzo, Tom, Krzyzewski, Michael W., McCallie, Joanne P., Richardson, Nolan, Self, Bill, Semrau, Sue, Smith, Orlando Tubby, Vanderveer, Tara, Williams, Roy, Wright, Jay, and 326 Additional Current or Former College Head Coaches as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellee and Affirmance, at 19, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., 397 F. Supp. 3d 126 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 2019), aff’d, 980 F. 3d 157 (1st Cir. 2020) [hereinafter Coaches Amicus Brief].Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

Brief for the President and the Chancellors of the Univ. of Cal. as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondents at 19, Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 136 S. Ct. 2198 (2016).Google Scholar

Coaches Amicus Brief, supra note 58 at 20 (internal citations omitted).Google Scholar

Id. (quoting Rebecca Trounson, “A Startling Statistic at UCLA,” L. A. Times, June 3, 2006, available at <https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-jun-03-me-ucla3-story.html> (last visited March 22, 2021).+(last+visited+March+22,+2021).>Google Scholar

R. Huerto, “Majority Patients Benefit From Having Minority Doctors, But That’s a Hard Match to Make,” University of Michigan Lab Blog, Op-Ed, March 31, 2020, available at <https://labblog.uofmhealth.org/rounds/minority-patients-benefit-from-having-minority-doctors-but-thats-a-hard-match-to-make-0> (last visited March 22, 2021) (citing “mounting evidence” that when physicians and patients share the same race it improves the overall care, including medication adherence, cholesterol screening, patient understanding of cancer risks, and perception of treatment options).+(last+visited+March+22,+2021)+(citing+“mounting+evidence”+that+when+physicians+and+patients+share+the+same+race+it+improves+the+overall+care,+including+medication+adherence,+cholesterol+screening,+patient+understanding+of+cancer+risks,+and+perception+of+treatment+options).>Google Scholar

AAMC Amicus Brief, supra note 3 at 16.Google Scholar

Id. at 5.Google Scholar

Id. (quoting Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 314 (1978) (Powell, J., plurality opinion)).Google Scholar

Fisher v. Univ. of Texas at Austin, 136 S. Ct. 2198, 2213 (2016) (quoting Grutter, 539 U.S. 306, 339 (2003)).Google Scholar

Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., 397 F. Supp. 3d 126, 195 (D. Mass. 2019).Google Scholar

Id. at 136.Google Scholar

AAMC Amicus Brief, supra note 3 at 6.Google Scholar

Id. at 24 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).Google Scholar

Id. at 5-6.Google Scholar

Id. at 6 (emphasis in original).Google Scholar

Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 136 S. Ct. 2198, 2215 (2016) (Thomas, J., dissenting).Google Scholar

Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 570 U.S. 297, 333 (2013) (Thomas, J., concurring).Google Scholar

Id. at 334 (alteration in original) (quoting Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 373 (2003) (Thomas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)).Google Scholar

Id. at 332.Google Scholar

Id. at 334.Google Scholar

Rahl, K., “Racing to Neutrality: How Race-Neutral Admissions Programs Threaten the Future Use of Race-Based Affirmative Action in Higher Education,” Texas Tech Law Review Online Edition 49, no. 109 (2017) (citing R. Sander and S. Taylor, Jr., “The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action,” Atlantic, Oct. 2, 2012, available at http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/10/the-painful-truth-about-affirmative-action/263122/ (last visited MARCH 22, 2021).Google Scholar

Sander, R. H., “A Reply to Critics,” Stanford Law Review 57 (2005).Google Scholar

See id. See also Zisk, supra note 16 at 94 (noting Justice Thomas’ position on race-conscious plans and discussing Professor Sander’s “mismatch” theory).Google Scholar

Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Plaintiffs and Appellants at 14, Sander v. State Bar of Cal., 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 276 (Ct. App. 2018) (No. A150625) (citing to a number of articles challenging the soundness of the “mismatch” theory of affirmative action).Google Scholar

Brief of Student Amici Curiae in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Counts IV and VI at 3, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., 397 F. Supp. 3d 126 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 2019), aff’d, 980 F. 3d 157 (1st Cir. 2020) (citing Brief of Empirical Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents at 14-16, Fisher v. Univ. of Tex., 133 S. Ct. 2411 (2013) (emphasis in original)).Google Scholar

. AAMC Amicus Brief, supra note 3 at 36-37 (quoting D. W. Carbado and C. I. Harris, “The New Racial Preferences,” California Law Review 96 (2008)) (internal quotation marks omitted)).Google Scholar

Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244, 304 (2003) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting).Google Scholar

Id. Google Scholar

Id. at 305.Google Scholar

Id. at 298 (Souter, J., dissenting).Google Scholar

AAMC Amicus Brief, supra note 3 at 36.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

See Zisk, supra note 16 at 60-61 (predicting this issue will reach the Supreme Court and, when it does, that the Court will overturn the well-established precedent upholding race-conscious plans). 93. Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 317 (1978) (Powell, J., plurality opinion).Google Scholar

Brown University Amicus Brief, supra note 38 at 2-3.Google Scholar

AAMC Amicus Brief, supra note 3 at 15.Google Scholar

“The Majority of U.S. Medical Students Are Women, New Data Show,” Dec. 9, 2019, Association of American Medical Colleges, available at <https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/majority-us-medical-students-are-women-new-data-show> (last visited March 22, 2021) (quoting D. J. Skorton, M.D., AAMC president and CEO).+(last+visited+March+22,+2021)+(quoting+D.+J.+Skorton,+M.D.,+AAMC+president+and+CEO).>Google Scholar

Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 314 (1978) (Powell, J., plurality opinion).Google Scholar