American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Mayday Pain Project, at <http://www.aslme.org/research/mayday_rfp_021601.php> (last visited March 1, 2001).+(last+visited+March+1,+2001).>Google Scholar

Titles vary for nurse practitioners from state to state. In Alabama, the registered nurse who has successfully completed an approved nurse practitioner master's degree in nursing, been certified by a national board acknowledged by the Alabama Board of Nursing, been recommended for approval for collaborative practice by the Joint Committee on Advanced Nursing Practice of the Alabama Boards of Nursing and Medical Examiners, and been confirmed by the Board of Nursing may use the ti “certified registered nurse practitioner” (CRNP). This is what is meant by use of the term “nurse practitioner” in this article.Google Scholar

Isaac, S. and Michael, W.B., Handbook in Research and Evaluation, 2nd ed. (San Diego: Edits publishers, 1981). The action research design is described as being relevant to actual situations in the work world, and providing a framework for problem-solving and new developments. For this project, data were obtained from applications for collaborative practice, literature and case law searches, interviews with investigators from the Alabama Boards of Nursing and Medical Examiners, e-mail questionnaires to other boards of nursing and mail questionnaires to a sample of Alabama certified registered nurse practitioners. The questionnaires were subjected to outside evaluation for content validity. Confidentiality of individual responses was imposed. Data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Chi-square was applied to determine associations between selected variables. Respondents did not consistently answer all questions; therefore, analysis of data allowed for missing cases.Google Scholar

Furrow, B.R., “Pain Management and Provider Liability: No More Excuses,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29, no. 1 (2001): 28–51, at 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martino, A.M., “In Search of a New Ethic for Treating Patients with Chronic Pain: What Can Medical Boards Do?,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 26, no. 4 (1998): 332–49, at 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joranson, D.E. et al., “Pain Management and Prescription Monitoring,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 23 (2002): 231–38, at 231. Several other experts have addressed undertreatment of pain, including Johnson, S. H., “Disciplinary Actions and Pain Relief: Analysis of the Pain Relief Act,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 24, no. 4 (1996): 319–27, available at <http://www.painandthelaw.org/aslme_content/24-4c/24.4c.html>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hester, N.O. et al., “Symptom Management Outcomes, Do They Reflect Variations in Care Delivery Systems?,” Medical Care, 35, suppl. (1997): NS69–83, at NS69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Id. at NS77–78.Google Scholar

Furrow, , supra note 4, at 29.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, D.E., “Pain Management and Palliative Care in the Era of Managed Care: Issues of Health Insurers,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 26, no. 4 (1998): 267–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hester, et al., supra note 7, at NS69.Google Scholar

Joranson, et al., supra note 6, at 231.Google Scholar

Peine, S.I., ed., Drug Enforcement Administration, “Security of Confidential Information and Patient Confidentiality,” Diversion and Abuse of Prescription Drugs: A Closer Look at State Prescription Monitoring Programs (April 2000), available at <http://www.deadiverson.usdoj.gov/pubs/program/rx_monitorinex.html>. In this portion of the report, reference is made to concerns about access to personal information and medical records. Three acts now pending were named: S. 573, “Medical Information Privacy and Security Act“; S. 578, “Health Care Personal Information Nondisclosure Act of 1999”; and S. 881, “Medical Information Protection Act of 1999.”.+In+this+portion+of+the+report,+reference+is+made+to+concerns+about+access+to+personal+information+and+medical+records.+Three+acts+now+pending+were+named:+S.+573,+“Medical+Information+Privacy+and+Security+Act“;+S.+578,+“Health+Care+Personal+Information+Nondisclosure+Act+of+1999”;+and+S.+881,+“Medical+Information+Protection+Act+of+1999.”>Google Scholar

Spratley, E. et al., Health Resources and Services Administration, The Registered Nurse Population: Findings from the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000), available at <http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/rnsurvey/rnssl.htm>.Google Scholar

Crawford, L. et al., 2001 Licensure and Examination Statistics (Chicago: National Council on State Boards of Nursing, 2002). This citation and the statistics were provided by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing by e-mail on April 15, 2002. E-mail communications on both April 5, 2002 and April 15, 2002 conveyed that their numbers of advanced practice nurses varied from those in the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) report, The Registered Nurse Population: Findings from the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (supra note 14). While the number of nurse practitioners was similarly accounted for by both organizations (approximately 87,000 for the National Council to 88,000 for HRSA), the overall figures varied considerably (approximately 138,000 for the National Council to 196,000 for HRSA). The variance is due to a number of factors, including dates of data collection, sources of data collection, classifications of practice areas, and various attrition factors (e.g., death, license and/or certification lapse, change of profession). The data from the National Council were collected from the fifty-five jurisdictions that legally authorize advanced practice nursing, whereas the HRSA data were collected from an adjusted sample of registered nurses throughout the United States. The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners stated by e-mail on April 5, 2002 that their 2001 data show approximately 80,000 nurse practitioners recognized to practice in the United States. The term “recognized” has meaning relative to authority to practice, not just educational preparation to practice.Google Scholar

This statistic was provided by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing by e-mail on April 15, 2002.Google Scholar

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Profiles of Member Boards 2000 (Illinois: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 2001): At 251.Google Scholar

Safriet, B.J., “Health Care Dollars and Regulatory Sense: The Role of Advanced Practice and Nursing,” Yale Journal of Regulation, 9, no. 2 (1992): 417–88.Google Scholar

Furrow, , supra note 4, at 28.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pain Management, What Is Pain Management?, at <http://www.aapainmanage.org/aapm/whatis.html> (last visited September 12, 2001).+(last+visited+September+12,+2001).>Google Scholar

An EBSCO Host Academic search was conducted by the Alabama Public Library Service in Montgomery on December 18, 2001. Thirty-one articles referenced prescriptive authority for pain management by professionals such as pharmacists, psychologists, and advanced practice nurses.Google Scholar

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO), Pain Management Standards for 2001 (2002).Google Scholar

Mann, J.B., Permaloff, A., and Howard, G., “Consumers' Perceptions of Competence,” Educational Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, July 27, 1999. The Alabama Board of Nursing's “Accountability Model” was first presented in a research report to the Board of Nursing on July 14, 1999.Google Scholar

Brushwood, D.B., “From Confrontation to Collaboration: Collegial Accountability and the Expanding Role of Pharmacists in the Management of Chronic Pain,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29, no. 1 (2001): 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, F.M. and Batey, M.V., “Clarifying Autonomy and Accountability in Nursing Service, Part 2,” Journal of Nursing Administration, 12, no. 10 (1992): 10–15, in Roper, K.A. and Russell, G., “The Effect of Peer Review on Professionalism, Autonomy, and Accountability” Journal of Nursing Staff Development, 13, no. 4 (1997): 198–206.Google Scholar

Chaska, N.L., “Avoiding the Fatal ‘By-Pass Operation’ in Facilitating Accountability,” in Chaska, N.L., ed., The Nursing Profession Tomorrow and Beyond (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishers, 2001): 825–39, at 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joranson, et al., supra note 6, at 232.Google Scholar

Id. at 233. Additionally, forty-four states have adopted state pain policies through laws and regulations. See Joranson, D.E. et al., 2001 Annual Review of State Pain Policies: A Question of Balance (Madison: Pain & Policy Studies Group, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2002), available at <www.medsch.wisc.edu/painpolicy/publicat/01annrev/contents.htm>.Google Scholar

Kelly, L.Y. and Joel, L.A., Dimensions of Professional Nursing (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995): At 467.Google Scholar

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, supra note 17, at 1.Google Scholar

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Nursing Regulation, at <http://www.ncsbn.org/public/regulation/regulation_index.htm> (last visited April 11, 2002).+(last+visited+April+11,+2002).>Google Scholar

Sherwood, G.D. et al., “Defining Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice: Expanding Primary Care Services,” The Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice, 1, no. 2 (1997), at <http://216.39.195.244/ostia/index.php?xmlFilePath=journals/ijanp/vol1n2/scope.xml>.Google Scholar

Gray, M.L., “Advanced Practice Nursing Roles: Preparation and Scope of Practice,” in Chaska, N.L., ed., The Nursing Profession Tomorrow and Beyond (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishers, 2001): 515–26, at 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, et al., supra note 15.Google Scholar

Curtis, C., The ABC's of Advanced Practice Nursing, Wild Iris Medical Education Website, available at <http://www.nursingceu.com/NCEU/courses/advpraccc/> (last visited April 3, 2002). (last visited April 3, 2002).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Curtis,+C.,+The+ABC's+of+Advanced+Practice+Nursing,+Wild+Iris+Medical+Education+Website,+available+at++(last+visited+April+3,+2002).>Google Scholar

Carson, W.Y., American Nurses Association, 2000 Prescriptive Authority Chart (revised February 1, 2000), available at <http://www.nursingworld.org/gova/charts/dea.htm>..>Google Scholar

Spratley, et al., supra note 14.Google Scholar

Gray, , supra note 33, at 518.Google Scholar

Curtis, , supra note 35.Google Scholar

Crawford, et al., supra note 15.Google Scholar

Curtis, , supra note 35.Google Scholar

Kalish, P.A. and Kalish, B.J., The Advance of American Nursing (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1978): At 660.Google Scholar

Sherwood, et al., supra note 32.Google Scholar

Gray, , supra note 33, at 520.Google Scholar

National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice, Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services: Federal Support for the Preparation of the Nurse Practitioner Workforce through Title VIII (Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, 1997): At 14–15. See also Crawford, et al., supra note 15.Google Scholar

Safriet, , supra note 18, at 417.Google Scholar

Gray, , supra note 33, at 517.Google Scholar

Sermchief v. Gonzales, 660 S.W2d 683 (Mo. 1983).Google Scholar

Kelly, and Joel, , supra note 29, at 476–77; Cournoyer, C.P., The Nurse Manager and the Law (Rockville, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, 1989): At 118.Google Scholar

Cournoyer, , supra note 50, at 109.Google Scholar

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, supra note 17, at 230.Google Scholar

Id. at 241.Google Scholar

Carson, , supra note 37.Google Scholar

Ala. Code § 34-21-81 (4)(a) (2002). Nurse practitioners in Alabama demonstrate by certification the “advance knowledge and skills” necessary for “consultation, collaborative management, or referral as indicated by the health status of the client” and thereafter practice as certified registered nurse practitioners.Google Scholar

Peine, , supra note 13, at “Historical Background.” In this section, a historical background is given relative to the Controlled Substances Act (1970) and subsequent regulations.Google Scholar

“Collaboration and Independent Practice: Ongoing Issues for Nursing,” Nursing Trends and Issues (column), Nursing World, 3, no. 5 (May 1998), available at <http://www.nursingworld.org/readroom/nti/9805nti.htm>..>Google Scholar

Carson, , supra note 37.Google Scholar

Ala. Code § 34-21-80 (2002).Google Scholar

Ala. Admin. Code r. 610-X-9 (2002).Google Scholar

Ala. Code § 34-21-81 (8) (2002).Google Scholar

Ala. Admin. Code r. 610-X-9 (2002).Google Scholar

Alabama Board of Nursing, Application for Approval to Practice as an Advanced Practice Nurse in Alabama (December 2002), available at <http://www.abn.state.al.us/downloads/applications/apn-1.pdf>..>Google Scholar

Id. The list of approved legend drugs for consideration by the Joint Committee for nurse practitioners to prescribe is as follows: Antihistamine and decongestant drugs; analgesics and antipyretics; blood derivatives; coagulation agents; central nervous system agents; agents of electrolytic, caloric, and water balance; expectorants and cough preparation; gastrointestinal drugs; prosthetics/orthotics; local anesthetics; pulmonary drugs; spasmolytics; vitamins; antiinfective agents; autonomic drugs; blood formation; cardiovascular drugs; diagnostic agents; enzymes; ophthalmic drugs; antiinflammatory drugs; hormone and synthetic substitutes; birth control drugs and devices; serums, toxoids, and vaccines; antineoplastic agents; heavy metals; radioactive agents; gold compounds; oxytoxics; and an “other” category.Google Scholar

Alabama Board of Nursing, supra note 64.Google Scholar

Sherwood, et al., supra note 32.Google Scholar

Hamric, A.B. et al., “Outcomes Associated with Advanced Nursing Practice Prescriptive Authority,” Journal of American Nurse Practitioners, 10, no. 38 (March 1998): 113–118, at 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, Position Statement on Nurse Practitioner Prescriptive Privilege (revised 2002), available at <http://www.aanp.org/NR/rdonlyres/endrj7vquyvfoiqes72iehwsp4trvz43ualmwdmkmn6qrnidad62mapicxl5zcortuqv2pghxohzte/Position%2bStatement%2bPrescriptive%2bAuthority.pdf>..>Google Scholar

Carson, , supra note 37.Google Scholar

A Westlaw search of the ALLSTATES and ALLFEDS databases was conducted by the Alabama State Supreme Court Library research attorney on January 11, 2002, using the following: Nurse =2 Practitioner/P Prescript! “Pain Management”.Google Scholar

Ala. Code § 34-21-86 (a)(1–2) (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Personal communication from Alabama Board of Nursing and Alabama Board of Medical Examiners investigative staff regarding a case under investigation (November 2002).Google Scholar

“We met with about 15 CRNP educators. They wanted the Board to do something about third party payment. They wanted to talk about barriers to practice but they did not have a core curriculum….” Comment made by N.G. Lee, executive officer of the Alabama Board of Nursing, in her March 21, 2001 report to the board at its March 21–23, 2001 meeting.Google Scholar

Sherwood, et al., supra note 32.Google Scholar

National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice, supra note 46, at 23.Google Scholar

Dickson, C.J. and Mann, J.B., Nurse Practitioners in Alabama, A Synthesis of Perceptions of Role and Regulatory Accountability, Concurrent Educational/Research Sessions, (Chicago: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 1995): At 163–203.Google Scholar

Lazarus, J.B. and Lee, N.G., Alabama Board of Nursing Initial Report Findings of the RN Workforce 2000 (Montgomery: Alabama Board of Nursing, 2000), report presented at the Alabama Board of Nursing Regulatory Invitational Summit, Prattville, Alabama, October 19, 2001.Google Scholar

Spratley, et al., supra note 14.Google Scholar

This information was obtained from an Alabama Board of Nursing survey conducted in October 2001 of those educational programs offering master's degrees with specialties for family nurse practitioners, adult nursing practitioners, and acute care practitioners. While eight educational institutions offer master's degrees with nurse practitioner tracks, only six offer the specialties described. Due to assurances of confidentiality, neither the programs nor their respondents are named.Google Scholar

While the curriculum plans stated that there were clinical experiences in prescriptive practice, individual respondents, in their qualitative responses, commented that their clinical experience was conducted under preceptors and not instructors. Some indicated that their courses were taught online rather than in the classroom or a clinic.Google Scholar

Several of the nurse practitioners indicated they were not in collaborative practice at the time of the survey. Reasons were not given; however, when nurse practitioners seek a new collaborative practice, application for approval must again be requested from the Board of Nursing. The request must again be processed through the Joint Committee.Google Scholar

This is technically correct. The Alabama Administrative Code, r. 610-X-9, specifies collaborative practice parameters for physicians and nurses.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, , supra note 10.Google Scholar

E-mail survey, Alabama Board of Nursing (December 18, 2001).Google Scholar

Information provided by Cyndy Haynes, director of education and practice, West Virginia Board of Examiners for Registered Professional Nurses (January 22, 2002).Google Scholar

“Alternative disciplinary participants” are nurses enrolled in an alternative disciplinary program who have voluntarily acknowledged substance abuse or a physical or mental condition rendering them unable to meet the standards of the nursing profession, and are monitored without their licenses being placed on probation or revoked subsequent to § 34-21-25(j) of the Alabama Code (2002).Google Scholar

The interview with the Board of Medical Examiners investigators was conducted on January 16, 2002.Google Scholar

The guidelines being referenced are the “Guidelines for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Pain,” Ala. Admin. Code r. 540-X-4-.08 (2002). The investigator who made this comment specifically monitors for compliance with the protocols and uses a standard questionnaire.Google Scholar