Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:43:13.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Rights and Wrongs: Could Health Impact Assessment Help?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Eileen O’Keefe  and
Alex Scott-Samuel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While the importance of civil and political rights to health advocates is widely acknowledged, economic and social rights are not yet securely on advocates’ agenda. Health impact assessment is an approach that can promote an appreciation of their importance. This paper introduces health impact assessment, gives examples of how it is being used, links its development to a focus on inequalities in health status, indicates the insufficiency of civil and political rights to protect health, and shows that the use of health impact assessment draws attention to economic and social rights. While civil and political rights are an astonishing social achievement, they are not in themselves sufficient to promote health.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , Winter 2002 , pp. 734 - 738
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Economist, “Human Rights: Chickens and Foxes,” The Economist, April 21, 2001, at 66.Google Scholar
Scott-Samuel, A., “Health Impact Assessment — Theory into Practice,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52 (1998): 704–05, at 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milio, N., Promoting Health Through Public Policy (Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1981).Google Scholar
Secretary of State for Health, Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation, Cm. 4386 (London: The Stationery Office, 1999).Google Scholar
Acheson, D. (Chairman), Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health (London: The Stationery Office, 1998).Google Scholar
See id. at 5.Google Scholar
See id. at 30.Google Scholar
Scott-Samuel, A. Ardern, K., and Birley, M., “Assessing Health Impacts on a Population,” in Pencheon, D. et al., eds., Oxford Handbook of Public Health Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001): 48–58.Google Scholar
Fleeman, N. and Scott-Samuel, A., “A Prospective Health Impact Assessment of the Merseyside Integrated Transport Strategy (MerITS),” Journal of Public Health Medicine, 22 (2000): 268–74; Winters, L.Y., “A Prospective Health Impact Assessment of the International Astronomy and Space Exploration Centre,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55 (2001): 433–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R., ed., Equity and Health Impact Assessment Seminar— Manchester 16th–17th June 2000 (Liverpool: Liverpool Public Health Observatory, 2000); Douglas, M. and Scott-Samuel, A., “Addressing Health Inequalities in Health Impact Assessment,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55 (2001): 450–51.Google Scholar
See Barnes, , supra note 10; Douglas, and Scott-Samuel, , supra note 10.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C.B., Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Cohen, G.A., Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M., The Rise of the Network Society, vol. 1 of The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, 2d ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).Google Scholar
Steiner, H. and Alston, P., International Human Rights in Context (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
British Medical Association, The Medical Profession and Human Rights: Handbook for a Changing Agenda (London: Zed Books, 2001): at 24.Google Scholar
See id. at 26.Google Scholar
WHO Regional Office for Europe, Declaration on the Promotion of Patients’ Rights in Europe (Amsterdam: WHO Health Law Section, University of Amsterdam, 1994).Google Scholar
O’Keefe, E., “Human Rights and Health Promotion in Europe: The Case of Children in the United Kingdom,” in Parker, M., ed., Ethics and Community (Preston, United Kingdom: University of Central Lancashire Press, 1995); O’Keefe, E. and Hogg, C., “Social Inequality, Policy Formation and Children’s Mental Well-Being,” in Hosin, A., ed., Essays on Issues in Applied Developmental Psychology and Child Psychiatry (Lampeter, Wales: Edwin Mellen Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Yamey, G., “U.S. Trade Action Threatens Brazilian AIDS Programme,” British Medical Journal, 322 (2001): 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, F., Values for a Godless Age: The Story of the United Kingdom’s New Bill of Rights (London: Penguin, 2000): at 141.Google Scholar
Clapham, A., “Globalization and the Rule of Law,” in Dieng, A., ed., Globalization, Human Rights and the Rule of Law (Geneva: International Commission of Jurists, 1999): at 31.Google Scholar
Bales, K., Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000): at 46.Google Scholar
Mann, J., “Medicine and Public Health, Ethics and Human Rights,” Hastings Center Report, 27, no. 3 (1997): 6–13, at 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See id. at 10.Google Scholar