Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:58:42.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expanding Choice through Defined Contributions: Overcoming a Non-Participatory Health Care Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Robert E. Moffit
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the Affordable Care Act) is the law of the land. But it faces an uncertain future.

During congressional deliberations on the 2,700-page legislation leading up to its enactment, from February to March 2010, not one major survey recorded majority support for the legislation. Since its enactment, popular opposition to the Affordable Care Act has hardened, and was a significant factor in the 2010 congressional election, in which Democrats lost 63 seats and Republicans regained the majority in the House of Representatives. Ballot initiatives in Missouri and Ohio, showcasing popular opposition to the individual mandate, passed in 2010 with overwhelming majorities. While the United States Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566 ( 2012), declared the mandate on the states to expand Medicaid unconstitutionally coercive, the majority of the Justices also upheld the individual mandate as a permissible tax. The new law thus emerged as a central topic in the 2012 election.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , Fall 2012 , pp. 558 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blendon, R. J. Benson, J. M., “Health Care in the 2010 Congressional Election,” New England Journal of Medicine 363 (October 27, 2010): E30(1)-e30(5), available at <http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1011714>(last visited August 28, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Republicans campaigned against the legislation, while most Democrats ran away from defending the new law. Exit polling showed deep dissatisfaction with the new law, with voters nearly split on whether it should be repealed. Fox News, “Newly Empowered House Republicans Eye Repeal of ‘Obamacare,’” November 3, 2010, available at <http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/03/newly-empowered-house-republicans-eye-repeal-obamacare>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Rasmussen Reports, “63% Favor Repeal of National Health Care Plan,” May 24, 2010, available at <http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/may_2010/63_favor_repeal_of_national_health_care_plan>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Rasmussen Reports, “52% Favor Repeal of Health Care Bill,” June 28, 2010, available at <http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/june_2010/52_favor_repeal_of_health_care_bill>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Zogby Interactive Poll, “Zogby Interactive: 51% of Voters Oppose Healthcare Reform Act,” April 21, 2010, available at <http://www.zogby.com/news/2010/04/21/zogby-interactive-51-of-voters-oppose-healthcare-reform-act/>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Hacker, J., “Health Reform 2.0,” The American Prospect, July 2010, available at <http://prospect.org/article/health-reform-20-0>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Popular anxiety over costs, fear of losing coverage, and anger over insurance denials of claims or coverage have fueled majority support for major health care reform since the debate on the Clinton Health Security Act of 1993. For example, the Robert Wood Johnson–Harvard School of Public Health Survey in March 1993 found that 56 percent of Americans wanted a major overhaul of the health care system. On March 1, 2007, the CBS News/New York Times poll found that 54 percent of Americans wanted “fundamental changes” in the system. CBS News/New York Times Poll, “U.S. Health Care Politics,” March 1, 2007, available at <http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/CBSNews_polls/health_care.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
On public response to the various Medicare reform proposals, see Blendon, R. J. Benson, J. M., “The Public's Views about Medicare and the Budget Deficit,” New England Journal of Medicine 365 (July 13, 2011): E8(1)-e8(4), available at <http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1107184>(last visited August 28, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keehan, S. P. et al. , “National Health Spending Projections through 2020: Economic Recovery and Reform Drive Faster Spending Growth,” Health Affairs 30, no. 8 (August 2011): 1594–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, R. S., “Estimated Financial Effects of ‘The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’, as Amended,” Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, April 22, 2010, available at <https://www.cms.gov/ActuarialStudies/downloads/PPACA_2010-04-22.pdf> (last visited August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “National Health Expenditure Data: Historical,” available at <http://www.cms.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/02_NationalHealthAccountsHistorical.asp#TopOfPage>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Conover, C. J., “Health Is the Health of the State,” The American: The Journal of the American Enterprise Institute, July 19, 2011, available at <http://www.american.com/archive/2011/july/health-is-the-health-of-the-state>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Elmendorf, D. W., Letter to the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker, the U.S. House of Representatives, March 20, 2010, available at <http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/113xx/doc11379/amendreconProp.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Krugman, P., “Medicine: Who Decides?” New York Times, December 26, 2005, at A-31.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, S., “A ‘Broader Regulatory Scheme’ – The Constitutionality of Health Reform,” New England Journal of Medicine 363, no. 20 (2010): 1881–1883, available at <http://healthpolicyandreform.nejm.org?p=12896&query=TOC>(last visited August 23, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, M., “America's Coming Health Care Oligopoly,” Forbes, July 7, 2010, available at <http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/07/healthcare-reform-insurance-hospitals-contributors-merrill-matthews-obamacare.html>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last visited August 23, 2012).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Matthews,+M.,+“America's+Coming+Health+Care+Oligopoly,”+Forbes,+July+7,+2010,+available+at+(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
President Barack Obama, “Remarks by the President to a Joint Session of Congress on Health Care,” The White House, September 9, 2009, available at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/remarks-by-the-president-to-a-joint-session-of-congress-on-health-care/>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Kohn, L. T., Health Care Price Transparency: Meaningful Price Information Is Difficult for Consumers to Obtain Prior to Receiving Care, U.S. Government Accountability Office, September 2011, available at <http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-791>(last visited August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
See Elmendorf, , supra note 13, at Table 5.Google Scholar
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds, May 13, 2011, at 41, available at <https://www.cms.gov/reportstrust-funds/downloads/tr2011.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
United States Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, “Competition Law: Hospitals,” Improving Health Care: A Dose of Competition, July 2004, at 1, available at <http://www.ftc.gov/reports/healthcare/040723healthcarerpt.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Christianson, J. B. Tu, H. T. Samuel, D. R., “Employer Sponsored Health Insurance: Down But Not Out,” Center for Studying Health System Change, Issue Brief No. 137, October 2011, available at <http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/73482hscib137employersponsoredinsurance20111103.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Staman, J., Memorandum to Sen. John Cornyn (R–TX), “Legal Analysis of Section 1311(e)(1)(B) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and State Sponsored Public Health Plans,” Congressional Research Service, September 24, 2010, at 3, available at <http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/M20100924_20100924.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Book, R. A. Ramlet, M., “What Changes Will Health Reform Bring to Medicare Advantage Plan Benefits and Enrollment?” Medical Industry Leadership Institute, Carlson School of Management, October 2011, at 7, available at <http://americanactionforum.org/sites/default/files/Embargoed_Book+Ramlet_MILI-Working-Paper_2011-10-13_Final.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Specifically, Congress provided a $250 rebate for Medicare beneficiaries who entered the “donut hole,” a pre-ordained gap in drug coverage where beneficiaries pay 100 percent of drug costs until they reach a specified catastrophic threshold. A feature of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003, the donut hole was purely the product of congressional imagination. It was a way to provide a universal drug entitlement while attempting to control costs by creating an interim out-of pocket payment requirement. No such benefit design was found in the private sector. The Affordable Care Act basically fills up the “hole.” It requires companies to provide a 50 percent discount for brand-name drugs, and it imposes a 25 percent cap on total benefciary costs for those who find themselves in the “donut hole.”.Google Scholar
Merlis, M., “The Federal Employees Health Benefits program: Program Design, Recent Performance, and Implications for Medicare Reform,” Kaiser Family Foundation, May 2003, available at <http://www.kf.org/medicare/upload/The-Federal-Employees-Health-Benefits-Program-Program-Design-Recent-Performance-and-Implications-for-Medicare-Reform-Report.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Francis, W., “The FEHBP as a Model for Medicare Reform: Separating Fact from Fiction,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 1674, August 7, 2003, available at <http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2003/08/the-fehbp-as-a-model-for-medicare-reform-separating-fact-from-fiction>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Francis, W., Putting Medicare Consumers in Charge: Lessons from the FEHBP (Washington, D.C.: The AEI Press, 2009): At 32.Google Scholar
America's Health Insurance Plans, “Medicare Advantage Plans,” available at <http://www.ahip.org/content/default.aspx?bc=39%7C341%7C321>(last visited November 10, 2011).(last visited November 10, 2011).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=America's+Health+Insurance+Plans,+“Medicare+Advantage+Plans,”+available+at+(last+visited+November+10,+2011).>Google Scholar
The Lewin Group, “Comparison of VA National Formulary and Formularies of the Highest Enrollment Plans in Medicare Part D and the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program,” December 10, 2008, available at <http://www.lewin.com/∼/media/lewin/site_sections/publications/3987.pdf>(last visited August 27, 2012).(last+visited+August+27,+2012).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
D'Angelo, G., “The VA Drug Pricing Model: What Senators Should Know,” Heritage Foundation WebMemo No. 1420, April 11, 2007, available at <http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2007/04/the-va-drug-pricing-model-what-senators-should-know>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last visited August 23, 2012).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=D'Angelo,+G.,+“The+VA+Drug+Pricing+Model:+What+Senators+Should+Know,”+Heritage+Foundation+WebMemo+No.+1420,+April+11,+2007,+available+at+(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Brunswick, D., “Health Insurance Costs to Rise Again Next Year,” CNN Money, September 22, 2011, available at <http://money.cnn.com/2011/09/22/pf/health_insurance_costs/index.htm>(last visited August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Lemieux, J., Memorandum to the Medicare Commission, The National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare, February 17, 1999, available at <http://medicare.commission.gov/medicare/jeff.html>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Congressional Research Service (CRS), The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Possible Strategies for Reform, May 24, 1989, at 255. This CRS study remains the most comprehensive analysis of the FEHBP.Google Scholar
See Francis, , supra note 28, at 112.Google Scholar
O'Grady, M. J., “Health Insurance Spending Growth: How Does Medicare Compare?” Report prepared for the Joint Economic Committee, June 10, 2003, available at <http://ogradyhp.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/JEC_HI_Growth_Rate_reportfinal.238132146.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last visited August 23, 2012).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=O'Grady,+M.+J.,+“Health+Insurance+Spending+Growth:+How+Does+Medicare+Compare?”+Report+prepared+for+the+Joint+Economic+Committee,+June+10,+2003,+available+at+(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
See Francis, , supra note 28, at 133.Google Scholar
CMS Actuary Richard, S. Foster has said that the long-term viability of the Medicare payment reductions is “doubtful.” See Foster, , supra note 10, at 21. Likewise, CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf has said that the new law had put policies into effect that would be “difficult to sustain.” See Elmendorf, , supra note 13, at 14.Google Scholar
Kennedy, K., “Medicare Advantage: Enrollment is Up, Premiums are Down,” USA Today, February 1, 2012, available at <http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-01-31/medicare-advantage-enrollment-premiums/52906712/1>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Atherly, A. Thorpe, K., “Value of Medicare Advantage to Low Income and Minority Medicare Beneficiaries,” Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, September 20, 2005, available at <http://c0540862.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/Ken_Thorpe_MA_Report.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012). Estimates are in 2005 dollars.Google Scholar
The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Report to Congress: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System, June 2011, at 68, available at <http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun11_EntireReport.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
See Francis, , supra note 28, at 27.Google Scholar
Kliff, S., “What a 76-Cent Premium Decrease Says about Medicare's Future,” Ezra Klein's Wonkblog, Washington Post, August 9, 2011, available at <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/what-a-76-cent-drug-premium-decrease-says-about-medicares-future/2011/08/02/gIQAZyI84I_blog.html>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last visited August 23, 2012).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Kliff,+S.,+“What+a+76-Cent+Premium+Decrease+Says+about+Medicare's+Future,”+Ezra+Klein's+Wonkblog,+Washington+Post,+August+9,+2011,+available+at+(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
The data are from the Office of the Actuary, CMS, “Comparison of the Office of the Actuary's Original Title I MMA Cost Estimates to those Underlying the CY 2011 Trustees Report,” August 2011.Google Scholar
Such criteria include appropriate testing, the use of certain drug therapies, mammograms, beta blockers for cardiovascular patients, and specific tests for diabetes.Google Scholar
Brennan, N. Shepard, M., “Comparing Quality of Care in the Medicare Program,” American Journal of Managed Care 16, no. 11 (November 2010): 841–848, available at <http://www.ajmc.com/media/pdf/AJMC_10nov_Brennan841to848.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
America's Health Insurance Plans, Center for Policy and Research, “Working Paper: A Preliminary Comparison of Utilization Measures Among Diabetes and Heart Disease Patients in Eight Regional Medicare Advantage Plans and Medicare Fee-for Service in the Same Service Areas,” September 2009, available at <www.ahip.org/MA-vs-FFS-Report-2009/>(last visited August 27, 2012). The findings were based on risk-adjusted data.(last visited August 27, 2012). The findings were based on risk-adjusted data.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=America's+Health+Insurance+Plans,+Center+for+Policy+and+Research,+“Working+Paper:+A+Preliminary+Comparison+of+Utilization+Measures+Among+Diabetes+and+Heart+Disease+Patients+in+Eight+Regional+Medicare+Advantage+Plans+and+Medicare+Fee-for+Service+in+the+Same+Service+Areas,”+September+2009,+available+at+(last+visited+August+27,+2012).+The+findings+were+based+on+risk-adjusted+data.>Google Scholar
Donahue, M. et al. , “The Medicare Drug Benefit (Part D) and Treatment of Heart Failure in Older Adults,” American Heart Journal 160, no. 1 (July 2010): 159–165, available at <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2898511/pdf/nihms-204918.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, J. M., “Implementation of Medicare Part D and Nondrug Medical Spending for Elderly Adults with Limited Prior Drug Coverage,” JAMA 306, no. 4 (July 2011): 402–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. Schoen, C., “Managed Care, Choice and Patient Satisfaction,” The Commonwealth Fund, August 1997, available at <http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Fund-Reports/1997/Aug/Managed-Care–Choice–and-Patient-Satisfaction.aspx>(last visited August 27, 2012).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
The United States Office of Personnel Management, Fiscal Year 2010: Summary of Performance and Financial Information, at 15, available at <http://www.opm.gov/gpra/opmgpra/OPM2010_SummaryPFI.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Ayres, McHenry, and Associates, “National Survey of Seniors Regarding Medicare Advantage,” February 26-March 2, 2007.Google Scholar
KRC Research, “Seniors Opinions about Medicare Rx: Sixth Year Update,” October 2011, available at <http://www.hlc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Oct-2011-KRC-Medicare-Today-Survey-of-Seniors-with-Medicare-Rx-10-14-11-FINAL1.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012). In 2011, KRC survey found only 11 percent of respondents saying that they were not satisfied. The high rates of enrollee satisfaction in Medicare Part D have been consistent since March of 2006. Since the fall of 2007, more than half of enrollees have described themselves as being “very satisfied” with the program.(last+visited+August+23,+2012).+In+2011,+KRC+survey+found+only+11+percent+of+respondents+saying+that+they+were+not+satisfied.+The+high+rates+of+enrollee+satisfaction+in+Medicare+Part+D+have+been+consistent+since+March+of+2006.+Since+the+fall+of+2007,+more+than+half+of+enrollees+have+described+themselves+as+being+“very+satisfied”+with+the+program.>Google Scholar
Butler, S. M. Fraser, A. A. Beach, W. W., eds., Saving The American Dream: The Heritage Plan to Fix the Debt, Cut Spending and Restore Prosperity, The Heritage Foundation 2011, available at <http://savingthedream.org/>(last visited August 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Cunningham, R., “Joint Custody: Bipartisan Interest Expands Scope of Tax-Credit Proposals,” Health Affairs (September 18, 2002), available at <http://content.*healthaffairs.org/content/early/2002/09/18/hlthaff.w2.290.citation>(last visited August 28, 2012).(last+visited+August+28,+2012).>Google Scholar
Sheils, J., “Ideas for Financing Health Reform: Revenue Measures That Also Reduce Health Spending: Statement for the Committee on Finance,” May 12, 2009, available at <http://finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/John%20Sheils.pdf>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
Carroll, R. Opinion, , “Almost Everyone Would Do Better Under the McCain Health Plan,” Wall Street Journal, October 27, 2008, available at <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122506862956370705.html>(last visited August 23, 2012).(last+visited+August+23,+2012).>Google Scholar
See Butler, et al. , supra note 58, at 27.Google Scholar
In a proposal developed by the Heritage Foundation, the funding for traditional Medicaid for the very poor and disabled would be converted into a capped amount and allotted to the states in the form of a block grant; the amount of that assistance would be annually indexed to the growth of medical inflation. While the states would be required to meet some basic national performance standards in the administration of the program, they would also have real flexibility in meeting these performance standards and in achieving national goals and outcomes. Id., at 25–28.Google Scholar
When the majority of the National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare endorsed a premium-support system of financing for the program in 1999, they proposed that the government pay 88 percent of the cost of a competing health plan, though they adjusted that contribution for income. Historically, taxpayers have financed, on a pay-go basis, roughly 88 percent of the Medicare program's total cost.Google Scholar