Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:25:20.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analyzing the Use of Race and Ethnicity in Biomedical Research from a Local Community Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

Most discussions of the use of race and ethnicity in biomedical research and clinical care focus on broad national and transnational populations. Looking at the problem from the perspective of large populations, however, misses the rest of a continuum that runs from the global human population to local communities. If race and ethnicity are fundamental categories for biomedical analyses, they should be informative at all points along that continuum, much as the definition of a gene remains unchanged whether analyzed in the context of an individual, a group, or the total human population. By examining the utility of racial and ethnic categories at a local community level, we can better evaluate whether those categories are indeed fundamental units for analysis. Alternatively, these categories may be analytic proxies useful primarily for approximating aggregate biological and social features of large populations at national and transnational levels of analysis.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Williams, D. R., “Race and Health: Basic Questions, Emerging Directions,” Annals of Epidemiology 7 (1997): 322–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M. W. and Aston, C. E., “A Practice Approach for Identifying Previously Unsuspected Environmental Contributors to SLE and Other Complex Diseases,” Environmental Health Perspectives 111 (2003): 593–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E., Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings (New York: Free Press, 1963).Google Scholar
LillieBlanton, M. and LaVeist, T., “Race/Ethnicity, the Social Environment, and Health,” Social Science and Medicine 43 (1996): 8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M. W. and Sharp, R. R., “Will Investments in Large-Scale Prospective Cohorts and Biobanks Limit Our Ability to Discover Weaker, Less Common Genetic and Environmental Contributors to Complex Diseases?” Environmental Health Perspectives 113 (2005): 119–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Fallon, L. R. and Deary, A., “Community-Based Participatory Research as a Tool to Advance Environmental Health Sciences,” Environmental Health Perspectives 110, Supp. 2 (2002): 155–59.Google Scholar