18 U.S.C. § 248; and Puger, Ana, “Groups Decry Attacks on Abortion Providers, Urge U.S. to Step Up Prosecutions,” Boston Globe, Jan. 20, 1995, at A12.Google Scholar

Price, Joyce, “Pro-Lifers Protest Use of '94 Access Law; Justice Accused of Restricting Freedom,” Washington Times, Jan. 13, 1995, at A8.Google Scholar

“Medical Council Clarifies Abortion Standards,” Washington Post, Feb. 18, 1995, at A2.Google Scholar

Beck, Joan, “Outrage Aborts an Outrageous Moral and Medical Edict,” Chicago Tribune, Feb. 19, 1995, at C3; and McNamee, Tom, “Training Hospitals Must Teach Abortion; Ruling Called ‘Moral Outrage’,” Chicago Sun-Times, Feb. 15, 1995, at 1.Google Scholar

St. Agnes Hospital v. Riddick, 748 F. Supp. 319 (D. Md. 1990) (holding that removal of accreditation because of inadequate family planning training did not violate Catholic hospital's free exercise of religion).Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Elisabeth, “Finances and Fear Spurring Hospitals to Drop Abortion,” New York Times, Feb. 20, 1995, at A1.Google Scholar

“Abortion Groups Call for Better Security,” States News Service, Jan. 19, 1995.Google Scholar

See Puger, , supra note 1.Google Scholar

American Life League, Inc. v. Reno, 47 F.3d 642, (4th Cir. 1995), aff'g 855 F. Supp. 137 (E.D. Va. 1994); Woodall v. Reno, 47 F.3d 656 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v. Brock, 863 F. Supp. 851 (E.D. Wis. 1994); Riley v. Reno, 860 F. Supp. 693 (D. Ariz. 1994); Cook v. Reno, 859 F. Supp. 1008 (W.D. La. 1994); Cheffer v. Reno, No. 94-0611-CIV-ORL-18, 1994 WL 644873 (M.D. Fla. July 26, 1994); and Council for Life Coalition v. Reno, 855 F. Supp. 1422 (S.D. Cal. 1994).Google Scholar

United States v. Wilson, _ F. Supp. _, No. 94-CR-140,1995 WL 114802 (D. Wis. Mar. 16, 1995).Google Scholar

American Life League, Inc. v. Reno, 47 F.3d 642 (4th Cir. 1995), aff'g 855 F. Supp. 137 (E.D. Va. 1994).Google Scholar

Laura Goodstein and Pierre Thomas, “Clinic Killings Followed Years of Anti-Abortion Violence,” Washington Post, Jan. 17, 1995, at A1.Google Scholar

“Abortion Rights Groups Report Rise in Threats Against Doctors,” Los Angeles Times, Dec. 21, 1994, at A32.Google Scholar

Lemonick, Michael, “An Armed Fanatic Raises the Stakes,” Time Magazine, Jan. 9, 1995, at 34.Google Scholar

See Goodstein, and Thomas, , supra note 12.Google Scholar

“Abortion Activists See Continued Threat,” Reuters, Jan. 19, 1995.Google Scholar

The Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, “In the States,” Reproductive Freedom News, Jan. 27, 1995, at 4, 6, 7.Google Scholar

“OB/GYN Residents: Abortion Training Will be Mandatory,” Health Line, Feb. 15, 1995.Google Scholar

Barron, James, “More Prospective Obstetricians Will Be Taught Abortion Skills,” New York Times, Feb. 15, 1995, at A1; and “OB/GYN Residents,” supra note 20.Google Scholar

See Beck, , supra note 4.Google Scholar

“Medical Backbone; New Rule on Abortion Training is Praiseworthy,” Houston Chronicle, Feb. 23, 1995, at A30.Google Scholar

See Rosenthal, , supra note 6.Google Scholar

Creamer, Anita, “When Doctors Can't Learn to Be Doctors,” Sacramento Bee, Feb. 21, 1995, at D1.Google Scholar

Skordas, Jennifer, “New Rule on Abortion? U. to Stand Pat, No Curriculum Change Planned in Medical School Despite Council's Edict,” Salt Lake Tribune, Mar. 4, 1995, at B2.Google Scholar

Stewart, Anne, Letter to the Editor, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Feb. 23, 1995, at 6B; and McNamee, , supra note 4.Google Scholar

“Creighton Stands Worthy of Respect,” Omaha World-Herald, Feb. 25, 1995, at 12; and McNamee, , supra note 4.Google Scholar

St. Agnes Hospital v. Riddick, 748 F. Supp. 319 (D. Md. 1990).Google Scholar

Id. at 326; and see also McKeesport Hospital v. ACGME, 24 F.3d 519 (3rd Cir. 1994) (holding that withdrawal of accreditation by ACGME did not constitute state action).Google Scholar

Id. at 329.Google Scholar

Id. at 343.Google Scholar

The newest weapon in antiabortion activists’ arsenal is the malpractice suit. Antiabortion activists are encouraging women to sue doctors who performed abortions on them for malpractice and emotional distress. While no one knows exactly how many of these cases are currently pending, a 1994 seminar on abortion malpractice sponsored by Life Dynamics, Inc. drew 125 people. Even if the suits are not successful, doctors say the nuisance value and rise in their insurance premiums that result can have a significant impact. See Lewin, Tamar, “Latest Tactic Against Abortion: Accusing Doctors of Malpractice,” New York Times, Apr. 9, 1995, at A1.Google Scholar