Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:59:03.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The clinical application of oto-acoustic emissions in paediatric audiological assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Abstract

The value of otoacoustic emissions as an objective screening test for normal peripheral auditory function in infants is currently the subject of extensive and promising research. Additionally the measurement of cochlear emissions is potentially useful when children cannot be tested reliably by traditional subjective methods but confirmation of normal hearing is diagnostically important. Three groups of children are described who present such audiological dilemmas: children with non-organic hearing loss, children with severe learning difficulties and more rarely children with an abnormal auditory brainstem response who also have damage to the central nervous system. In all three groups otoacoustic emission testing was found to be diagnostically useful in determining normal peripheral auditory function thereby resolving some of the dilemmas facing paediatric audiology and ENT clinics.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barr, B. (1960) Non-organic hearing problems in school children. Functional deafness. Acta Otolaryngologica, 52: 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfils, P., Uziel, A., Pujol, R. (1988a) Evoked oto-acoustic emissions from adults and infants: Clinical applications. Acta Otolaryngologica, 105: 445449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulloche, J., Aicardi, J. (1986) Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease: Clinical and Nosological study. Journal of Child Neurology. 1: 233239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, P. J., Kemp, D. T. (1987) An advanced cochlear echo suitable for infant screening. British Journal of Audiology, 21: 191204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coplan, J. (1987) Deafness: Ever heard of it? Delayed recognition of permanent hearing loss. Pediatrics, 79: 206213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, R. E, Newby, H. A. (1959) Children with non-organic hearing problems. Archives of Otolaryngology, 70: 619623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, D. T. (1978) Stimulated otoacoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64: 13861391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, D. T., Ryan, S., Bray, P. (1990) A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear and Hearing, 11: 93105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. K., Whitehead, M. L., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L. (1990) Potential of evoked otoacoustic emissions for infant hearing screening. Seminars in Hearing, 11: 186203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, M., Tucker, I. G. (1981) Functional hearing loss in children. Journal of British Association of Teachers of the Deaf, 5: 210.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. C, Webb, H. D., Smith, M. F., Buftin, J. T., Ruddy, H. (1987) A comparison of otoacoustic emissions and brain stem electric response audiometry in the normal newborn and babies admitted to a special care baby unit. Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 8: 95104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernon, M. (1970) Clinical phenomenon of cerebral palsy and deafness. Exceptional Children, 36: 743751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed